Anna Clark followed campaign coverage in Michigan during the 2012 election for CJR’s Swing States Project. This year, she will cover politics and policy reporting in Michigan as well as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Wisconsin for CJR’s United States Project, an outgrowth of The Swing States Project. The United States Project aims to be a force for better journalism about politics and policy. Our team of national contributors critiques coverage of federal tax and budget issues, healthcare policy, the quality of political rhetoric, debates on the social safety net, and the role of money in politics, while our network of regional correspondents monitors reporting on both state and federal policy issues at local media outlets around the country.
DETROIT — The day of the Newtown, CT, shooting—at nearly the exact same moment, in fact—a gunman opened fire in Frankstown Township, PA. He killed three, including a woman decorating a church for the holidays, and wounded three police officers before dying in a shootout.
Such tragedy is not, unfortunately, entirely unusual in Great Lakes states. Wisconsin has been the site of six mass shootings since 2004. A 2012 school shooting in Chardon, OH, killed three and wounded two; the suspect’s trial, scheduled for last week, was just postponed.
At the same time, the region boasts a thriving hunting culture. Michigan has the third-most licensed hunters in the nation, adding $1.3 billion to a starved economy. Hunting and fishing pour $2.8 billion into Ohio’s coffers.
All of which means that President Obama’s January 16th gun control proposal was a particularly resonant story for reporters and residents in this region, as is gun policy debate, in general. So, how did Great Lakes reporters cover the president’s proposal—and what might area reporters keep in mind for future coverage of this topic?
They localized it, to varying effect. John Canigula at the Cleveland Plain Dealer combed through Obama’s proposal with a local gun shop owner, weighing the store owner’s yeas and nays. Canigula’s lede brought a compelling visual to the policy debate: “The shelves at Five Star Firearms are nearly bare, a sign of the high demand brought on by political fear.”
WSAU, a Milwaukee radio station, broadcast a segment about Milwaukee mayor Tom Barrett saying that the 2012 mass shooting at a suburban Milwaukee spa “might not have happened had President Obama’s new gun measures been in place.” The broadcast nodded to the gun control positions of Milwaukee’s police chief (pro) and sheriff (con), but would’ve been stronger with direct quotes; among the three officials, a total of three words are between quotation marks.
MLive, a Michigan news source, surveyed local leaders on both sides of the debate in a decent overview of the state’s political climate on gun control that ran in six affiliated newspapers, including The Grand Rapids Press and The Flint Journal—albeit, online at least, under a headline with an unfortunately literal metaphor: “Obama gun control proposals draw fire from Michigan firearms groups.” John Barnes, who wrote the article, told me that years of investigations on gun issues, including his reports on concealed weapons and self-defense homicides, translated into “a number of contacts on both sides of the gun issue, who have come to consider our coverage balanced. I have many of their cell phone numbers, and they generally return calls quickly.”
Similarly, they brought their Washington representatives into the drama. In Pennsylvania, Harrisburg’s Patriot-News featured Democratic Sen. Bob Casey as longtime gun advocate calling for stricter controls. As reporter Ivey DeJesus describes it, it’s “an emotional turnabout to voters” by Casey, who has a favorable NRA rating. Casey said the Newtown shooting “deeply affected him.” This is an important story—though DeJesus might’ve mentioned last month’s Pennsylvania shooting alongside Newtown, as it’s certainly crucial local context.