COLUMBIA, SC — In the run-up to the November presidential elections, skirmishes over voter ID requirements, among other voting rules, bubbled up in several swing states—including Colorado, North Carolina, Pennsylvania, and Virginia—as well as in the federal courts.
This week, news out of Virginia confirmed those fights aren’t likely to fade. And neither will the need for clarifying coverage, for reporting that steers clear of the he-said, she-said pitfall, for reporters who avoid attributing something that can be stated as fact. More on that—and how some Virginia reporters fared Tuesday—to come.
While Virginia does not have a government-issued photo ID law, the state’s General Assembly on Tuesday passed companion bills that would reduce the number of documents voters can provide in order to cast a ballot there. The Republican-controlled House of Delegates passed the bill 63-36; the evenly-split Senate, however, required Republican Lt. Gov. Bill Bolling’s tie-breaking vote. Bolling also voted for a Democratic amendment requiring a voter education component and delaying the bills’ implementation until 2014.
So what would this legislation restrict if signed into law?
From Tuesday’s Fredericksburg Free-Lance Star:
It removes utility bills, paychecks, bank statements and Social Security cards as acceptable forms of ID to vote.
The bill would, however, allow concealed weapons permits.
Free-Lance Star government reporter Chelyen Davis asked the House bill’s sponsor, Del. Mark Cole, R-Spotsylvania, why he came up with the new restrictions.
“Those are very weak forms of ID and not generally accepted as ID in other transactions,” Cole said on Monday.
He said he filed the bill specifically after video surfaced of Rep. Jim Moran’s son discussing with a purported campaign worker ways in which that worker might encourage fraudulent voting using fake utility bills.
“So I thought it was appropriate to tighten up the list to more acceptable forms of ID,” Cole said.
The Free-Lance Star’s Davis pointed out for readers why Democrats have problems with the bill and feel it makes the voter ID requirements passed in the state last year even worse. (By way of background: last year Virginia passed a voter ID law that did not require a picture ID, but did mandate other forms of identification in order to cast a regular ballot. The Department of Justice upheld the law last summer. The proposed new restrictions would further limit those forms of ID.) From Davis’s piece:
“There are people, mostly elderly, many of them but not all poor, who do not have any of these IDs that will be left, because they don’t drive anymore because they don’t have a valid driver’s license, they don’t have a concealed weapons permit,” said Del. Jennifer McClellan, D-Richmond. “All they have is the voter registration card sent by the state.”
As The American Prospect’s Jamelle Bouie wrote:
Put simply, voting has just become more difficult for those Virginians who don’t have driver’s licenses, don’t own concealed weapons, and aren’t students. If your priority is voter integrity―i.e., preventing voter fraud―it’s hard to understand the reason for this change. Social Security cards, pay stubs, utility bills, bank statements, and government checks are hard to fake, and are accepted standards for identification for other government functions.
Bouie also correctly noted that the Virginia DMV lists Social Security cards as one of many acceptable documents for proof of legal US residency, which contradicts the bill sponsor’s statement about them not being generally accepted IDs in other transactions (information that unfortunately did not make it into the Free-Lance Star, which included the sponsor’s statement in its story).
Prior to the November presidential election, media coverage of the voter ID debate became the poster child for a critique of false balance. It followed a dustup at The New York Times, in which the paper’s public editor responded to critics about a voter ID story they argued gave equal balance to both sides of the debate. In so doing, critics argued, the paper wrongly suggested that the amount of in-person voter fraud happening in the United Sates was enough to justify voter ID laws. (In fact, evidence of in-person voter fraud is incredibly rare in the United States.)