As 2012 draws to a close, CJR writers brainstormed the year’s best reads in their beats.
From New York magazine, ”The Romney Economy”, by Benjamin Wallace-Wells. We’re cheating a bit here (the story actually ran in late 2011), but this well-reported piece is one of the most nuanced looks we came across at what Mitt Romney’s Bain Capital actually did, and how the rise of private equity shaped far-reaching developments in the American economy. Reihan Salam’s National Review essay, “Let Us Now Praise Private Equity,” is a good companion piece, offering an articulate defense of the Bain way. And while Wallace-Wells’s article ran before the Bain-related rhetoric really started flying, Steve Koff of the Cleveland Plain Dealer delivered a measured, richly reported look at Bain’s management of one clothing chain that set a high bar for scrutiny of campaign claims.
“The Obama Memos: The making of a post-partisan Presidency,” by The New Yorker’s Ryan Lizza. This article isn’t as flashy as Lizza’s epic 2008 story on Obama’s political raise in Chicago, but it’s full of insights about the factors shaping Obama’s presidency and anchored around a reporting scoop, an important stimulus policy memo from Larry Summers to Obama before inauguration.
Alec MacGillis did a lot of great reporting in Ohio this year for The New Republic, and this big-picture look at the swing state’s political landscape is among his best. Also excellent: this piece on Romney benefactor and CEO of Murray Energy, Robert Murray, and ”his surprisingly generous employees.”
”How Nonprofits Spend Millions on Elections and Call it Public Welfare.” Kim Barker’s exhaustive investigation for ProPublica of “the darkest corner of American political fundraising” was the standout story in a strong body of work.
Sasha Issenberg’s “Victory Lab” corpus at Slate, from a trend-setting February piece on the Obama campaign’s “Narwhal” program to a series of fall posts on Democrats’ voter-registration and turnout strategies. And, while we admit we haven’t yet read it, Issenberg’s three-part series for MIT’s Technology Review, “A More Perfect Union. How President Obama’s campaign used big data to rally individual voters,” looks promising.
Molly Ball’s Atlanticpiece, “Obama’s Edge: The Ground Game That Could Put Him Over the Top”, was a standout effort on an oft-attempted story, and an example of how to do strategy/tactics reporting without falling for the consultants’ schtick. More recent, deep-dive reporting from Ball: “The Marriage Plot: Inside This Year’s Epic Campaign for Gay Equality.”
And, of course, The Onion on “The Vice-Presidency of Joe Biden”. Because, “Shirtless Biden Washes Trans Am in White House Driveway.”
What's interesting is the journalism that isn't written. In California we see the future that statist policy-promoters have in mind for the country as a whole. Some investigation of how a state with such advantages has reached stagnation in population (=jobs) growth over the past two decades, relative to the rest of the country, might be instructive - the Golden State's high unemployment is a drag on the national rate as a whole. Republican midwestern governors in Ohio, Michigan, and Wisconsin have come in for a fair amount of critical press scrutiny, which is fair. But the pathetic, dysfunctional state of Illinois has skated in spite of its serious problems. I hope that's not because Illinois has become a Democratic-dominated state carrying out the usual agenda of high taxes to support unionized public-worker pensions and so forth. Or that it is the home state of a president over whom most journalists cannot fawn enough - re David Gregory's comparison of the pride of Cook Country to Lincoln over the weekend.
#1 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Mon 31 Dec 2012 at 12:28 PM
Jesus Mark, after your embarrassing showing just before the newtown massacre,
http://www.cjr.org/full_court_press/bob_costas_v_james_brown_on_be.php#comment-67990
you'd think you'd give the right wing troll thing a rest.
Fine, may your next year be as long and reality departed as the last one.
And when it comes to California versus other states, how far into the low income, net federal transfer nitty gritty do you want to go?
Because you can play about with republican vs democrat state comparisons but we should keep in mind where the moocher states are:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/dailychart/2011/08/americas-fiscal-union
and where they aren't. And they aren't in California or Illinois.
#2 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 1 Jan 2013 at 04:12 AM