I remember sitting there in the grass on Greene’s front lawn late in the day and watching reporters leave the property with no interviews. Eventually, when a photographer and I were the last ones there, I offered the compromise not to bring up his charges. It seemed at the time the only way to get anything. It worked, and I got the interview. And it wound up bringing more context to the story than had previously been out there about what was fast becoming an international news story.
Back to West Virginia and the present day, Journal editor Kinsler said the paper would have loved to ask Manchin questions about the gun debate going on in Washington where he’s a key player. But that wasn’t going to happen that day. Staff said he wouldn’t answer them.
Because Manchin is “our senator,” as Kinsler told me, the paper took its opportunity to ask him about the sequester and infrastructure issues facing its readership in the eastern panhandle.
“Right in front of us is sequestration; right in front of us is infrastructure,” Kinsler says. “We needed to provide a service to our readers.”
Whether Manchin’s process-oriented and generally superficial answers to the Journal reporter’s not particularly hard-hitting questions did that, we suppose, is ultimately up to the paper’s readers. I’m glad The Journal disclosed the conditions put forth by Manchin’s staff, as it’s already provided even more context for the Manchin-and-guns narrative the senator’s trying to avoid.
Follow @USProjectCJR for more posts from this author and the rest of the United States Project team.