NEW HAMPSHIRE — When covering New Hampshire, as with any primary, the general journalistic strategy is to trail the candidates around the state, cameras and microphones out, as they visit as many restaurants, grade school auditoriums, and American Legion halls as possible. This is fucking exhausting, and it’s the sort of thing that’ll grind even the best reporter down into a simpering, horse-race handicapping, quote-plugging hack. We’re often quick to criticize campaign coverage for its focus on the ephemeral and the predictive, but the modern campaign is built to emphasize those things, and it’s not entirely the reporter’s fault that he or she so often fails to transcend the banality of the source material. These reporters are told by their editors to stick to the trail, and they’re expected to file various dispatches from it every single day; as such, they don’t always have the latitude to ramble about in search of meaningful stories.
Over the last two days I decided to immerse myself in the campaign life and attend as many candidate events as possible. Here’s an abbreviated, impressionistic record of a twenty-nine-or-so hour span in which I learned absolutely nothing of use, and spoke to almost no one who wasn’t frantically vying for my attention. In many ways, I am not a very good campaign reporter. But, then again, it’s hard to be a good campaign reporter.
Sunday, 4:45 PM: After filing a story, I leave for a Mitt Romney event in Exeter, New Hampshire, only to change plans when I realize that Exeter is much farther away than I originally thought. New Hampshire looks small on a map, but it has crummy, picturesque roads that don’t support fast driving. Also, it is dark, and I don’t really know where I’m going. After taking the wrong exit and ending up in the outskirts of Manchester, I abandon the Romney plan and stop for chicken fingers instead. I am confident I made the right choice. (Despite this.)
Sunday, 7:00 PM: A pound-and-a-half of chicken fingers later, I end up at a soporific Gingrich town hall at Pinkerton Academy in Derry, New Hampshire. In the rear of a packed auditorium, dozens of badly dressed journalists stand around chatting, waiting for Gingrich to appear. “The Radisson’s like $500 a night,” one says, somewhat enviously. He is staying somewhere out on the highway. Gingrich’s advance man takes the podium and establishes the ground rules: once the town hall is over, form an orderly line and “you can get a picture with the next president of the United States!” A journalist standing next to me raises his eyebrows. Another guy chimes in: “Is it Obama?”
No, it’s Newt, to everyone’s regret, who proceeds to conduct a drowsy, uninformative town hall in which he hits almost all the same points he covered in the previous night’s debate, deviating from the script only to mention Ronald Reagan at least once a minute. I wander into the building’s foyer, where an AP photographer is snapping three kids who have covered their faces with Newt 2012 stickers. “We’re gonna be in the news!” says one kid. The only other non-official personnel in the hallway are two Ron Paul people, keeping tabs on the speech. The Ron Paul people are everywhere, and they’re always eager to talk. “The dumbest question the media ask is, ‘Why is he an isolationist?’” says campaign volunteer Tom McDonough. “To accuse him of being an isolationist is completely false. What Ron is is a non-interventionist.”

Good stuff, Justin.
Okay, makes me a little more sympathetic to the crap journalism we endure every campaign season. I blame the assignment editors. There *has got* to be a better way. This is no way to run a democracy.
#1 Posted by James, CJR on Tue 10 Jan 2012 at 04:39 PM
Where can I read more of this journalist's writing?
#2 Posted by Mike Robbins, CJR on Tue 10 Jan 2012 at 06:12 PM
Thanks for explaining in a very readable way what a weird and usually fruitless exercise this kind of assignment is.
I would wholeheartedly welcome coverage that spent "more time truth-testing a candidate’s assertions and ads."
#3 Posted by SBatchelor, CJR on Tue 10 Jan 2012 at 06:34 PM
Yea, but I mean, it's very hard to cover this one in a meaningful way. Don't most journalists understand this doesn't matter at all. We've known for like 4 months the nominee will be probably be Romney and he will probably lose to Obama by a few states.
Given that, it's pretty hard to find something interesting to say about Newt Gingrich, Huntsman, Santorum, people who are ultimately pretty irrelevant.
#4 Posted by Daniel, CJR on Wed 11 Jan 2012 at 04:50 PM
Great story- I particularly enjoyed your conclusion that eating chicken fingers is a better use of your time than watching Chris Chistie discuss what's "going down". While you're out truth testing, could you please look into whether or not corporations are people too?
#5 Posted by Election junkie, CJR on Thu 12 Jan 2012 at 09:51 PM