The same could be said for the town hall, which is at least more lively, if no more novel, than last night’s Gingrich event. Santorum is an engaging stump speaker who interacts with his questioners; Gingrich is the professor who spends the entire first class session reciting his own syllabus. If nothing else, these trail events tell you a lot about a candidate’s public speaking prowess—which, as we know, is the key qualification for a president.
Monday, 6:00 PM: An hour-long drive brings me back toward Manchester in time for a Mitt Romney rally at a school in nearby Bedford. It takes me a while to find Bedford (dark, map-less), and when I get there the parking lots are full and the side streets are jammed with parked cars, as if they were giving away free wallets inside. The Ron Paul people are there, with their homemade signs and their devotion, simultaneously inspiring and disconcerting. I eventually find a parking spot a quarter-mile away, but it’s cold outside, I’m late anyway, and Romney’s not going to say anything of interest. (Although, CNN found Romney’s “demeanor” during a “skirmish” with a protester to be “markedly different.”) I head back to Manchester.
Monday, 6:30 PM: Newt Gingrich is scheduled to give a speech at his Manchester headquarters, but the event has been hijacked by Occupy protesters and Ron Paul people, who have rigged a digital projector to flash “RON PAUL 2012” on top of the “Newt 2012” headquarters sign. This is the most technically advanced tactic to come out of the Paul camp all week. Whereas the rest of the candidates have professionally-designed signage, the Paul people often favor ominous, black-on-white signs that appear to have been made all at once in some dilapidated punk squat using particle board and stencils purchased at a discount from a Big Lots that lost its lease. Also there: two people wearing pig costumes. The protesters block the sidewalk outside of Gingrich HQ, and Gingrich is apparently spooked by all this, because he cancels the event. (The AP noticed this, too).
I consider whether to talk with some of the Paul people—who, as I said, are always lively and talkative—but I see nothing particularly interesting in their current theatrics and I’m too hungry to get sucked into a long debate about monetary policy. Consider whether to attend a Santorum rally at a restaurant in downtown Manchester. Decide against it, because I’ve already seen Santorum today. Consider whether or not to go tailgate with Buddy Roemer in Durham, New Hampshire. Decide against it, primarily because I do not know how to get to Durham, New Hampshire. Consider whether to go and get more chicken fingers. Decide to go and get more chicken fingers.
Monday, 7:45 PM: I end up at a sports bar called The Draft in Concord, where my old pal Newt Gingrich is scheduled to watch the BCS Championship Game. Gingrich makes a quick tour of the restaurant, trailed by a gaggle of cameramen, jockeying for position—“Let’s talk about how you were pushing me out of the way,” one hisses to another. “This is my fourth presidential campaign, honey. It’s not my first.”—and then disappears to an upstairs party room for the rest of the night. As the game proceeds, I spend about an hour talking to an exuberant woman who had just come from a Huntsman rally in Exeter. “I tried to see him at a bakery earlier, but he was gone before I got there,” she said. I know the feeling.

Good stuff, Justin.
Okay, makes me a little more sympathetic to the crap journalism we endure every campaign season. I blame the assignment editors. There *has got* to be a better way. This is no way to run a democracy.
#1 Posted by James, CJR on Tue 10 Jan 2012 at 04:39 PM
Where can I read more of this journalist's writing?
#2 Posted by Mike Robbins, CJR on Tue 10 Jan 2012 at 06:12 PM
Thanks for explaining in a very readable way what a weird and usually fruitless exercise this kind of assignment is.
I would wholeheartedly welcome coverage that spent "more time truth-testing a candidate’s assertions and ads."
#3 Posted by SBatchelor, CJR on Tue 10 Jan 2012 at 06:34 PM
Yea, but I mean, it's very hard to cover this one in a meaningful way. Don't most journalists understand this doesn't matter at all. We've known for like 4 months the nominee will be probably be Romney and he will probably lose to Obama by a few states.
Given that, it's pretty hard to find something interesting to say about Newt Gingrich, Huntsman, Santorum, people who are ultimately pretty irrelevant.
#4 Posted by Daniel, CJR on Wed 11 Jan 2012 at 04:50 PM
Great story- I particularly enjoyed your conclusion that eating chicken fingers is a better use of your time than watching Chris Chistie discuss what's "going down". While you're out truth testing, could you please look into whether or not corporations are people too?
#5 Posted by Election junkie, CJR on Thu 12 Jan 2012 at 09:51 PM