Meanwhile, Richmond television station WTVR wasn’t about to be left out of his particular pork barrel. The station’s Mark Holmberg opined on his own experiences at the eatery—and his thoughts about Romney’s ad—while also drawing on some colorful local reaction. Here’s his lede (click here for the video):
You have to be a blind supporter of President Obama’s to say the economy hasn’t been tough for the past four years.It’s succinct, insightful, and fun (hey, it’s not every day that you get to work “frackanackle” into a story). It’s also an illustration of how politics, and news, is still local—and of how media can draw on local knowledge to help us determine if we’re getting a pig in a poke in a campaign’s claims.
But you also have to be a blind critic of the president to blame him for the closing of Bill’s Barbecue.
In my view, this longtime Richmond institution has no one to blame but itself.
A new, sad and heartfelt Romney/Ryan campaign ad getting national attention shows Bill’s owner Rhoda Elliott tearfully blaming the economy, and President Obama’s handling of it, for the death of this family-owned institution.
“That’s a bunch of frackanackle bull!” said Agnes Hawkins, a lifelong Richmond resident who estimates she has eaten at Bill’s more than a thousand times. She says the business has slipped in recent years, with poor service and prices. She blames bad management, not the Oval Office.

Yeah. Well. Deomcratic policies don't cost nobody no jobs. Which I guess is why California's economy is in such good shape. And that of Illinois. Nobody in the MSM will ask.California is as close to being the future that the Democratic Party envisions for the whole country, but the MSM won't look into the implications. Western European social democracy is fracturing before our eyes, but MSMers still run starry-eyed stuff about all those social welfare goodies. The French just elected a Socialist president promising soak-the-rich policies - and alread his poll numbers are as low as those of his defeated predecessor. Left-wing economics never hurt anyone except a few shadowy millionaires. Who believes this stuff?
#1 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Mon 12 Nov 2012 at 12:45 PM