However, the move wasn’t wholly spontaneous: Charlie Hoslet, executive director of strategic partnerships at UW-Madison, said in a June 4 email obtained by CJR that his office had “received an inquiry last week from the legislature about the arrangement between the university and the Center for Investigative Journalism.” The email continued:
We explained that the Center was not part of the UW but that there is a Facilities Use Agreement in place that provides space for the Center in exchange for various services and educational resources for students provided by the Center. It seemed that the information provided satisfied whatever concerns there might have been.
However, we learned this afternoon that there has been some discussion about introducing an amendment in the Joint Finance Committee that would somehow impact the Center’s use of the space. We have not been provided a copy of the amendment and probably will not be given anything until right before it is introduced (assuming that actually happens). Don Nelson, our Director of State Relations, will continue to monitor and and (sic) try to influence this…
Haslett, in a follow-up email less than an hour later, noted that, “Efforts to restrict the operations of other centers on campus (COWS) are attempted every budget cycle. This is the first known attempt to restrict the Center for Investigative Journalism in the state budget.”
This morning, Downey began circulating an email around the university urging the journalism school and broader university community to oppose both provisions of the budget amendment.
While the ban on WCIJ’s use of university office space would have a greater immediate effect, Downey, in an interview, said the prohibition on university staff working for the center signified a “pretty radical change” in policy.
His email notes that as written, the legislative language “would seem to broadly and recklessly infringe on our academic freedom in terms of research, teaching, and service. Our faculty and staff regularly collaborate with outside organizations on media-related projects in terms of research, teaching, and service.” Currently, no department faculty do paid work for WCIJ, but a J-school professor emeritus serves as secretary on the center’s board of directors, and Andy Hall is a “zero dollar” honorary fellow at the school.
WCIJ, in a posted response to what it called “lawmakers’ early-morning attack,” noted that while the biennial budget must still clear the full Assembly and Senate, leaders in both houses have said they want to make no further changes to the spending plan. “If this holds true, the budget language will pass and become law unless [Gov.] Walker vetoes it,” the post says.
Downey said that he is mobilizing a response from around the university, centered on the academic freedom angle. Meanwhile, the center is asking its allies to contact legislative leaders—particularly Senate Majority Leader Scott Fitzgerald (R-Juneau) and Assembly speaker Robin Vos (R-Rochester)—and “let them know you support the Center’s nonpartisan, nonprofit journalism.”
Follow @USProjectCJR for more posts from this author and the rest of the United States Project team.

And reporters throughout the state should be asking the members of the legislature who supported this amendment why? They should determine with specificity what the impetus was for this. In other words, the elected officials should be held accountable. Here is reporting that helps the state, helps students and helps the public. The reason state legislators are opposed to that is????
#1 Posted by Karl Idsvoog, CJR on Wed 5 Jun 2013 at 06:49 PM
Alas! Does the awesomeness of Wisconsin Republicans know no bounds?
#2 Posted by Edward Ericson Jr., CJR on Thu 6 Jun 2013 at 03:27 PM
Good idea Karl. Of course the reason is because they are evil MFs and should be punished severely.
#3 Posted by steve sexauer, CJR on Thu 6 Jun 2013 at 05:16 PM
Well, clearly this Investigative Journalism Center is attempting to undermine the foundation of predatory capitalism with its investigations into Frac Sand Mining and hormones in the water. Jeez, can't a corporation just blow up the bluffs on the Mississippi River without a lot of nosy journalists poking around and reporting on the devastating effects?
#4 Posted by Alice Swanson, CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 11:43 AM
You might also want to mention the "Dracula" congress tactics being employed by the cheese-head Machiavelli's:
http://www.esquire.com/_mobile/blogs/politics/scott-walker-expells-investigative-journalists-from-wisconsin-060513
"You may note the fact that the Center got voted out of the capital at six in the morning. This may seem an odd time to be voting on anything, but you have not reckoned with the way the cheese-head caudillos have been operating these days. The session didn't even start until almost two in the morning, and there was a lot of mischief done in the dark of night."
This is the new normal, or actually the old normal since it's been operative since the 90's if you've been paying attention.
#5 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 12:42 PM
The Wisconsin government should have limited itself to seizing this organization's telephone records -- then it would have escaped CJR's notice.
#6 Posted by Tom T., CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 03:25 PM
The simple explanation is that investigative journalism is now regarded as partisan Liberal attack, since it tends to expose GOP and corporate wrong-doing. There may be an equally plausible explanation, but I confess I don't see one at the moment.
#7 Posted by JohnR, CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 03:37 PM
JohnR
Even though the nation is bombarded with Obama scandals, journalists are overwhelmingly liberal and Democratic and it shows in their reporting.
That said, why should any outside organization get state-funded office space?
#8 Posted by Dan Gainor, CJR on Fri 7 Jun 2013 at 05:32 PM
"Even though the nation is bombarded with Obama scandals"
Of which maybe one is real (the surveillance one which you righties thought was treasonous to talk about when the 'war president' had an R on his duncecap).
"That said, why should any outside organization get state-funded office space?"
I don't know, perhaps because it's not really the state's business how the university runs itself? I mean if the university chooses to allocate some office space to a non-profit venture for some benefit that it derives in the training and paid internships its students receive, why does the state get to single out one organization's contract with the university?
http://www.wisconsinwatch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Facilities-Use-Agreement-UW-WCIJ.pdf
Are you going to get upset about the use of state funded garden sheds used to store a contracted company's lawn mowers next?
And I sure hope none of the independent newspapers associated with John Karl's, James O'keefe's, and Ann Coulter's Coligiette Network use any state funded resources. That might tie a free thinking person in knots.
Hell, not even Charles Sykes can support the d-bagginess Wisconsin republicans are displaying here.
http://www.wisconsinwatch.org/2013/06/06/petty-vindictive-dumb-conservative-host-charlie-sykes-defends-the-center/
But, as always, the heartland climate denialist and MRC flying monkey, Danny Gainor steps up.
#9 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sat 8 Jun 2013 at 01:35 PM
At least 'Danny' Gainor posts under his own name - making Thimbles' characteristically ad hominem dissertatation unintentionally revealing on more than one level.
#10 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Wed 19 Jun 2013 at 10:11 AM