Sign up for The Media Today, CJRâs daily newsletter.
The president has a sales job to do if he wants the American people to get behind whatever reform emerges from the congressional sausage grinder in the next few days. As part of his pitch, he has been flogging three terms guaranteed to resonate with the publicâwaste, fraud, and abuse. Who isnât against waste? Nobody. Who isnât against fraud? Nobody except those committing it. Who isnât against abuse? Well, nobody, but what exactly does it mean in the context of health care?
The White House called the presidentâs initiative âa new effort to crack down on waste and fraud in Medicare, Medicaid, and other government programs through the expanded use of payment recapture audits.â In fact, he signed a presidential memorandum directing all federal agencies and departments to try harder to reclaim the governmentâs money through the use of these audits. The White House explained that the federal waste of the taxpayersâ money included payments made to the wrong person, for the wrong reasons, in the wrong amounts. And all these wrongs total some $98 billion in lost revenue to the federal treasury. Thatâs a good chunk that could be used for subsidies to the uninsuredâso if the government is to make good on its promise of health insurance for more people, it has to step up its collection efforts.
About the same time the president was educating the public about payment recapture audits, a contributor to a listserv I am on raised a relevant question: Who commits health care fraud, waste, and abuse? Is it mainly the providers or the consumers of health care? Who suffers, and who should be held accountable?
So I thought I would return to the journalistâs own staple–the man-on-the-street interview to see what ordinary people know about health care waste, fraud, and abuse. Would the president score a homer with this one? I stopped by the Union Square Greenmarket in Manhattan and asked customers and sellers what was meant by the terms. Most of the people I talked to struggled to answer my two questions: What do waste, fraud, and abuse mean in the context of health care, and who is responsible for it?
Jeffrey Sanders, age forty-two, said he was ânot really sureâ what the terms meant, but he was sure it was the government doing the abusing. A twenty-seven year old artist who wouldnât give his name shook his head and said waste meant waste management and hazardous materials. âI assume itâs the corporations doing it,â he said. âNot necessarily the government. I would hope Obama is talking about that.â Ron Siracusa, fifty-eight, was working at a booth operated by Di Paola Turkey Farms and had a different take. He told me he had been a government employee, and waste was the âexcesses of government programs.â Who is responsible for that, I asked? âItâs the politicians,â he said.
One man who was selling pickles wouldnât give his name or his age and admitted he didnât know much about health care. He didnât have insurance but thought the perpetrators of waste, fraud, and abuse were the government and insurance companies. Thatâs hardly surprising, given how that industry has won the Villain of the Year Award.
A flower seller from Long Island didnât want to give his name either, but he had plenty to say. Fraud is self-explanatory, he said. âYouâre lying and taking money for the wrong reasons. Money spent on health care is not wasteful. Everyone should have the same health care as the politicians. I am sure the abuse is all the way up the chain. Have you looked at a hospital bill? You get charged $30 for a box of Kleenex.â
The flower seller suggested that it was hopeless to try asking elected leaders much about anything substantive. âThey are trying to pass a bill. Who knows whatâs in it?â He continued: âCongressmen come through the market all the time. But ask them a meaningful question, and theyâre out of here. Iâve seen it. Weiner and all.â He was referring to New York Rep. Anthony Weiner.
A few people I chatted with were in the ballpark, sort of. Megan Stone, twenty-nine, was working at a booth selling baked goods. She said it was not individuals who were engaging in waste, fraud, and abuse, but âhospitals, CEOS, CFOs who are pushing money around.â She added âObama is focused more on the people who really cause the problem.â
Tom Toigo, age fifty-three, said he was active in Democratic politics in upstate New York. To him, health care waste meant that doctors are ordering more tests. He, too, said that it was the insurance companies that were causing health care abuse. âTheir perspective is how they can make the most money.â
Twenty-three year old Sierra Carrere was selling beans, grains, flour, and polenta. She knew her merchandise as she explained how to use spelt. She also knew a bit about health care. Abuse in health care, she said, was overmedicating children and giving prescriptions to people who donât need them. Abuse occurred when people canât get health care.
What does all this mean for the presidentâs sales job? He needs to put âwaste, fraud, and abuseâ near the top of pedagogical to-do list. It seems the public needs to understand the terms along with the individual mandate, affordability, age banding and all the other wonky terms the public is fuzzy on. The White House announcement did talk about boosting transparency. The administration is launching an Improper Payment Dashboard, which would let people see the details on improper payments, view error rates, and so on. But first, the WH needs some transparency in language if it is serious about communicating with the public.
Has America ever needed a media defender more than now? Help us by joining CJR today.