The sheer volume of coverage devoted this week to Sen. John Kerry’s “botched joke” has been stunning, even to our jaded eyes.
To maintain our sanity, we’ll break off a small chunk of the problem and focus our complaints for now on cable news — specifically, CNN (you know, the network whose mid-term election coverage has included exploring such critical questions as: “What Would Alex P. Keaton Do?”) and, specifically, on CNN’s “surround the story” coverage of BotchedJokeGate Wednesday afternoon and evening.
In sum, CNN couldn’t get enough of it. There were reports on Kerry’s original comments. Reports on assorted responses to Kerry’s comments. Reports on Kerry’s non-responses and responses to those responses. And reports on various responses to Kerry’s non-responses and responses.
Wolf Blitzer kicked off The Situation Room Wednesday afternoon by informing viewers that “there’s been no let up today in the Republican demands for an apology from Kerry,” before turning to White House Correspondent Suzanne Malveaux to ask the incisive question, “What precisely are they saying today, Suzanne?” Reported Malveaux: “For the White House, it’s the gift that keeps on giving.” (Thanks in no small part to CNN and its coverage of each cynical twist and turn.) Blitzer interrupted Malveaux’s report to read Sen. Kerry’s “carefully worded statement” of apology.
Moments later, during an interview with Rep. John Boehner (R-Ohio), Blitzer asked, “Is this over with now that [Kerry has] apologized?” and followed that up with, “So this story is over with as far as you’re concerned?” (Er, why was Blitzer looking for cues from Boehner as to when or whether a particular story “is over?” Isn’t that a call for Blitzer and CNN to make?) Boehner’s reply? “It is.”
Actually, it is not —- because, as Blitzer noted after the Boehner interview, “Up next, we’ll have more on the John Kerry controversy. Will the continued war of words have an impact on next week’s election?” In chimed Malveaux with “some reaction to John Kerry’s apology from officials at the White House.” Malveaux then read a statement from a Bush spokesperson (Kerry’s apology was “late, but the right thing to do”) at which point Blitzer commented, “It sounds like the White House is ready to move on as well…”
So, the majority leader says the story is “over.” The White House is “ready to move on.” What about CNN?
Not even close.
Moments later on the Situation Room:
BLITZER: “He’s apologized, but is it too late for John Kerry? Will the controversy hurt his chances in the next race for the White House? Or will it impact this year’s election at all? Jeff Greenfield standing by to weigh in…Jeff, with the apology, story over with now?”
GREENFIELD: Yes. I think — I think you just heard from John Boehner that, what are they going to do now, you know, ask him to go run through the streets and flog himself?”
But no. The story was not “over with now” for Blitzer, who later wondered aloud: “He’s apologized now. Is it enough?”
Not “enough” for CNN. Soon thereafter, Suzanne Malveaux returned to add this: “It’ll be interesting to see just how much legs this story really has. Vice President Cheney, in excerpts released by the White House, is supposed to make a joke, saying that Kerry was for his joke before he was against it, in a campaign rally in a couple of hours. We’ll see whether or not he actually makes those remarks…”
From there, Blitzer and his Situation Room colleagues went on to examine BotchedJokeGate from multiple new angles. To wit:
BLITZER: “John Kerry’s comments in California are being felt on the front lines. We’re seeing instant reaction almost from members of the U.S. military online. Our Internet reporter Jacki Schechner standing by with more on that.”
And:
BLITZER: “Coming up, from the top of the heap to untouchable in only two years. We’ll take a closer look at the declining fortunes of Senator John Kerry. Can he now bounce back, though, for another potential presidential run?”

OMG! I'm beating padikiller to a comment!
That shock out of the way, do you think that the media will ever stop falling for the faux outrage and demand for an apology gambit? It's amazing how easily the MSM are played by the Drudge-to-Malkin-to-NYPost-to-Fox echo chamber. Just because there's noise doesn't mean there's a story.
Posted by not the senator on Fri 3 Nov 2006 at 01:19 PM
And speaking of noise, today the echo chamber is trying to say that the NYT said that Saddam was less than a year away from a nuclear device in 2002.
The Washington Post is a little clearer on the dates:
The Office of the Director of National Intelligence said yesterday that it shut down a public Web site after complaints from U.N. weapons inspectors that the site included sensitive details about constructing nuclear and chemical weapons. The documents were collected in Iraq after the March 2003 invasion but predate the 1991 Persian Gulf War.
"predate the 1991 Persian Gulf War" Get that?
Jeez...get a grip will you. An unclear date in an article is not a Smoking Gun. It's just bad writing. But watch, the echo chamber will try and spin this into a story.
Posted by not the senator on Fri 3 Nov 2006 at 01:22 PM
A self-appointed "watchdog" of "professional journalism" wonders...
However did this become "one of the biggest stories out there leading up to the elections?"
padikiller responds
Geez... Maybe because a former Dem presidential candidate who voted in the Senate to send soldiers to war at the President's order... Issued a statement that on its face makes those soldiers look like idiots?... And then refused to apologize (before he apologized)? And then came out with a load of nonsensical crapola about flubbing a "joke"?
Now I'll admit that this story doesn't rise to the same level as to what CJR refers to as the "blockbuster" revelation of Sen Allen's "Jewishness".... (though John Kerry's almost identical Jewish heritage is curiously unworthy of note by the CJR "watchdogs" in McLearyland... Go figure...)
And an offensive comment made against our troops by a leading Senator WHO PUT THEM THERE.. A comment made while his country is at WAR... Now coverage of this comment certainly doesn't compare to the media's coverage of former President Clintons socks... Coverage that CJR encouraged...
Posted by padikiller on Fri 3 Nov 2006 at 02:35 PM
Pad,
Is Kerry running in the mid-terms? Is Bush?
Didn't think so.
Posted by Xanthippas on Sat 4 Nov 2006 at 01:11 PM
Xanthippas...
Is (or, more properly at present, given Flipper's recent verbal flipping and flopping, WAS) Kerry running all over the country attending campaign events for Dems facing election in midterms?...
HUH?....
Use your brains... And keep the ludicrous nonsense under wraps...
OK?...
Posted by padikiller on Sat 4 Nov 2006 at 04:26 PM