I was reading about political iPhone apps on MediaStyle.ca, a blog maintained by Canadian communications consultant Ian Capstick, when I noticed a strange little badge at the bottom of his post:

I clicked on it and a pop-up window invited me to “Correct grammar, spelling and other errors.” After highlighting text within the post, I was offered a menu from which to identify the type of error I wanted to fix. Then I was given a text box to make my correction.
This simple process had me sitting on the edge of my seat, as I was previously unaware anyone had built an application to help readers suggest corrections. I might be the only person to feel this way, but it was pretty exciting.
With that in mind, here are three quick profiles of error-prevention or correction technologies or services every journalist should keep on their radar. And if you’re aware of other projects that warrant watching, please e-mail me. I want to hear about them.
gooseGrade (Editz.com)
It turns out the company behind the corrections widget and underlying service, gooseGrade, was profiled by TechCrunch earlier this year. So hopefully the word is getting out. I spoke with the company’s twenty-four-year-old founder and CEO, John Brooks Pounders, this week, and he told me the company plans to rebrand as Editz.com in the next few weeks.
Simply put, they have created a way for Web sites to crowdsource edits and corrections. Web site owners can install the gooseGrade widget in order to have an easy, streamlined method for readers to submit proposed edits or corrections. Then gooseGrade collects and sorts these submissions so the publisher or author can accept or reject the changes. It simplifies the corrections process, which is a very good thing. The company also developed a WordPress plugin that makes the fixing process even faster.
“People are reluctant to fix errors, not because they don’t want to, but because it’s tedious,” Pounders told me.
This is a big issue for news organizations. After a correction is submitted, wires often get crossed inside a newsroom, and the error never gets fixed. On the other side of the equation, people hesitate to submit corrections because they don’t know whom to contact, or they don’t think the organization will follow up. A lot of the time, these fears are well founded. (Just read this report outlining how The Washington Post’s corrections process broke down.)
“People get discouraged if they send something and never hear back,” Pounders said.
He’s right. News organizations rely on the public to submit corrections, yet the process is often unclear or prone to delays and problems. The folks at gooseGrade—their system initially involved grading each page for accuracy—have created what appears to be an easy, workable system to facilitate the collection and application of edits and corrections. I think it could help a lot of news sites.
Right now, anyone can add the widget to their blog or Web site, and people can also sign up individually to suggest edits and corrections, which is made easier by the company’s bookmarklet.
Bite-Size Edits
Keeping with the theme of collaborative editing, Bite-Size Edits is a project currently in beta. Rather than pursuing a public form of collaborative post-publication editing, this project aims to help writers get their work edited before it reaches the world at large. People can sign up for an account and then upload their text for review by fellow users. The editing is “bite-sized” because the text is chopped into smaller chunks and fed into the system. Your fellow participants can then edit small sections of text. As of now, two people will read each section of text, and their edits are then fed to the author.
The project is led by Hugh McGuire, Janina Szkut, and Andy MacDonald, and it’s based in Montreal. I’ve known about the project for several months because McGuire and I are acquaintances. He is the founder of LibriVox, the Internet’s largest repository of free audio books, and I wrote about him for The New York Times a few years back.

Thanks for the link Craig. We are using GooseGrade to keep my rampant typos in check; and I use creative punctuation that drives a reader or two of mine around the bend. Only so much my own proof reading can do. And, as you - more than most- are aware, errors are easy to make. They have amazing customer service as well - we had a technical issue with the install over Christmas and they were great at pushing some fixes for it. Love you work Craig, thanks for reading (and hopefully not correcting). Ian.
#1 Posted by Ian Capstick, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 07:02 PM
Hey Craig, thanks for the write-up - I'm curious about Bite-Size Edits applicability in professional newsrooms. Any initial thoughts?
#2 Posted by Hugh McGuire, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 11:11 AM
Craig, another very good program is PerfectIt. For a one time cost of $90, PerfectIt is downloaded directly to Word. When you're done with an article, you simply click the button and it spits out a report with suggested corrections. As a copywriter and editor, I find this program invaluable.
I appreciate you listing these other programs as well. I will be blogging about this very thing in February at www.TheConfidentCopywriter.com. I'll be happy to highlight your article as the original source of information.
Thanks!
#3 Posted by Victoria Ipri, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 06:16 PM
Craig: I'd never heard of any of these. Thanks for the run down, and thanks to the friend at FreelanceSuccess.com who linked to this post so the rest of us were aware of it. As a writer who blogs, I often think I've thoroughly proofread a post only to realize after I've hit the "Publish" button and looked at it again minutes or hours later I missed a typo or two or three - not good for my street cred or ego. I'll definitely consider using one of these in my writing practice, and will suggest that writers I'm working with on a new website do likewise.
Michelle Rafter
WordCount: Freelancing in the Digital Age.
#4 Posted by Michelle Rafter, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 08:31 PM
This simple process had me sitting on the edge of my seat, as [ = fowler frowns on this use since it's initially unclear whether "as" is a relative adverb, relative pronoun or conjunction] I was previously unaware anyone had built an application to help readers suggest corrections.
here are three quick profiles of error-prevention or correction technologies or services every journalist should keep on their [ = plural pronoun for singular antecedent] radar.
It turns out [ = "it" is meaningless and serves no purpose (unlike an expletive, which serves through balance inversion to ensure that a subject doesn't overshadow its predicate)] the company behind the corrections widget and underlying service, gooseGrade, was profiled by TechCrunch earlier this year.
Simply put, they [ = plural pronoun for the singular "company"] have created a way for Web sites to crowdsource [??] edits and corrections.
Web site owners can install the gooseGrade widget in order to have an easy, streamlined method for readers to submit proposed [ = "submit proposed" seems redundant] edits or corrections.
It simplifies the corrections process, which [ = a relative pronoun requires an antecedent noun; a demonstrative pronoun would've been better, = "and that"] is a very good thing.
Right now, anyone can add the widget to their [ = plural pronoun for singular antecedent] blog or Web site, and people can also sign up individually to suggest edits and corrections, which [ = a relative pronoun requires an antecedent noun; an absolute construction would've been better, = "a process made easier"] is made easier by the company’s bookmarklet [??].
Rather than pursuing [ = "pursue" since "than" is a relative adverb, equivalent to "it aims to help to a degree exceeding the degree to which it aims to pursue"] a public form of collaborative post-publication editing, this project aims to help writers get...
Your [ = shift to second person from third person] fellow participants can then edit small sections of text.
I asked him if [ = whether] he thinks this model could potentially work in journalism.
And yet the spellcheckers we [ = shift to first person] use every day still manage to miss—and cause—so many typos.
Asonov, who has a Ph.D [ = no closing period in ph.d.]
#5 Posted by anonymous, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 10:08 PM
Hello. It looks like some of your organizational needs could be taken care of by looking in our direction for quicker solutions. Are you embarking on cost reduction while accommodating excessive work from your customers, without compromising your quality of work? Instead of sending your customers away to your competitors when your staffing is not adequate for your work volume, RDS is your answer to maintaining your customers. Our pricing is structured to allow your company to continue making profits from work that is outsourced to us. We are always looking for ways to help you increase your profits without compromising quality.. For more information, visit our website at http://www.risingdatasolutions.com
#6 Posted by Antonio Sulit Jr., CJR on Wed 24 Mar 2010 at 01:32 PM
Hello. It looks like some of your organizational needs could be taken care of by looking in our direction for quicker solutions. Are you embarking on cost reduction while accommodating excessive work from your customers, without compromising your quality of work? Instead of sending your customers away to your competitors when your staffing is not adequate for your work volume, RDS is your answer to maintaining your customers. Our pricing is structured to allow your company to continue making profits from work that is outsourced to us. We are always looking for ways to help you increase your profits without compromising quality.. For more information, visit our website at http://www.risingdatasolutions.com
#7 Posted by Antonio Sulit Jr., CJR on Thu 22 Apr 2010 at 01:03 PM