For a publisher, an ideal blog post strikes several nerves: It’s provocative, it has a simple hook, it generates links and traffic, and it leaves enough out for follow-ups. In other words, it is overstated, polarizing, and incomplete. And it must fulfill these conditions cheaply and at the lightning speed of the web. The divergence of interests is clear: what is good for online publishers is bad for their readers and, cumulatively, for culture itself.
Having studied and observed blogs from deep in the trenches, it is obvious to me that they are assailed on all sides, including but not limited to the crushing economics of their business, dishonest sources, inhuman deadlines, pageview quotas, inaccurate information, greedy publishers, poor training, the demands of the audience, and the marketing manipulation of people like me. Under this duress, their incentives become our reality.
In his landmark book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, Neil Postman argued that the dominant cultural medium determines the culture itself. Today, blogs and social media are that dominant medium.
Unfortunately, they worship a single god: traffic. The central question for the Internet is not, “Is this entertaining?” but “Will this get attention?” “Will it spread?” And it happens that almost everything that blogs do to get traffic, keep traffic, and profit from traffic puts them at odds with the truth, good journalism, and serving their readers.
That’s the world I operate in. This world exists primarily because it is so poorly understood—too commonly dressed up in the cyber-utopianism of the Jeff Jarvis crowd, or lost in the out-of-touch complaints of old-school journalists like David Simon.
I can’t tell you what can be done about all this—it’s too soon for that. All I can say is, this is what people like me do behind the scenes, this is how it’s possible, and these are the results.
I hope that’s enough.

This is an interesting, clear, and concise warning to all of journalism. The question is 1.) will it be heeded 2.) will Mr. Holiday put his money where his mouth is and try to do better himself.
#1 Posted by Janet Dean, CJR on Thu 19 Jul 2012 at 04:02 PM
Ah; so apparently print journalism is in the crapper because of those naughty, yellowpress blogs. Nothing to do with the point that print media long since gave up accuracy for sensationalism themselves? Which is the chicken and which the egg? As for sensationalism driving views, that's likely true. And yet, at least a few people read sources for information and not just affirmation or topless models found in headless bars. A consistently accurate and trustworthy site gets my views (as few as they are) every day. The Sun or the Daily Mail or Huffpo only gets my views by virtue of a link from a site I trust.
#2 Posted by JohnR, CJR on Thu 19 Jul 2012 at 04:27 PM
Uhh, isn't CJR part of the problem here? Why give Holliday column space about himself? Didn't you just get p'wned?
Why not an interview, or a Chittum column about him, instead?
#3 Posted by SocraticGadfly, CJR on Thu 19 Jul 2012 at 09:41 PM
Kind of ironic to write a blog post about...I mean, he clearly makes good points - our media system needs a change. But he says right here it's his job to exploit blogs - so is he taking his own advice, or continuing to take advantage?
#4 Posted by Eric, CJR on Thu 19 Jul 2012 at 11:25 PM
Agree with Eric - while the points Holiday makes in this post are valid - has he really come clean? Not sure if I am sold on his goal of reform.
#5 Posted by JBux, CJR on Fri 20 Jul 2012 at 12:48 AM
After getting my google reader and RSS feeds filled with articles and blog posts about or by Ryan Holiday today....right on the relase of his book....gives me the hint that, yeah, this guy knows what he's doing.
I agree with previous posters - it will be very interesting to see what Holiday's next move will be after this book. Will we see another Tucker Max media stunt soon again? Or will we see a dramatic change in online journalism?
#6 Posted by Lionel D, CJR on Fri 20 Jul 2012 at 02:49 AM
Until we consider the sort of work Holiday does as 'litter' in a more literal sense of the word, we are unlikely to see things change. Driving readers and consumers away from thinking in page-clicks is a baby step forward, one already thriving in the zeitgeist these days. Its not a stretch to say many are revolted by what they see and experience in the news these days and have turned off entirely.
#7 Posted by Pia Sawhney, CJR on Tue 24 Jul 2012 at 11:34 AM