On the night of November 14, when the NYPD sprung a surprise raid to evict Occupy Wall Street’s foundational Zuccotti Park encampment, credentialed press were pushed back by police into a pen, unable to watch the eviction at close hand. Mother Jones magazine’s Josh Harkinson live-tweeted how he was physically dragged along the ground and removed from the park by officers. New York mayor Michael Bloomberg defended police action the next morning, stating that journalists were kept at a distance to “protect” them. Commentators on Twitter, meanwhile, decried the move as a “media blackout.”
The Occupy Wall Street movement has proven a consistent challenge for journalists since demonstrations in New York first began in mid-September and spread to over seventy U.S. cities. Diffuse, amorphous, and leaderless, it has resisted traditional media narratives about the nature and structure of protest groups. Beyond the theoretical challenges, newsrooms are having to adapt to volatile crowds and unpredictable police actions. Over half a dozen professional journalists have been injured or detained covering Occupy events in less than two months.
Reporters from Oregon’s KGW-TV News will no longer be covering Occupy Portland protests in groups of less than three. After a masked demonstrator shoved one reporter and a man with a bloodied face approached another in a threatening manner, the station management changed its policy in order to have more staff on the ground, looking out for each other.
“The situation is constantly changing, we can’t use old solutions and old tactics for what appear to be new and developing circumstances,” said Mary Cavallaro, the assistant national executive director of the American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (AFTRA), a national labor union that represents over 70,000 artists and journalists. Cavallaro said that AFTRA was looking to employers to provide resources and training, communication networks, and equipment for reporters in the field.
Portland is by no means the only site where reporters have been viewed with hostility by protesters. While covering the general strike in Oakland on the night on November 2, a Russia Today broadcast van was trapped by a crowd on the streets. From the scene, senior news producer, Lucy Kafanov, tweeted “R[ussia] T[oday] crew surrounded by protesters. Voting on whether to let us through. Half support us. Half don’t.” The reporters were eventually allowed safe passageway, but the incident is telling: journalists cannot work on the uniform assumption that everyone involved in the Occupy protests welcomes media presence.
The International News Safety Institute North America (INSI-NA) has advised that journalists who are heading out to protests, particularly where huge crowds and clashes with police are likely, should prepare themselves as might a foreign correspondent covering conflict. While the situation, of course, is not as dangerous as a combat zone like Afghanistan, metro reporters need to know where to position themselves in a crowd, need to have the right protective gear, and need to understand their rights under law. Indeed, dealing with police at Occupy demonstrations is proving the greatest challenge of all for many reporters.
“Stopping or detaining a journalist for even a few minutes can really hurt their ability to give a full and accurate account of a situation. And if journalists have to be in constant fear of arrests at Occupy protests, that will have a chilling effect on coverage,” said Bernie Lunzer, president of the Newspaper Guild, Communications Workers of America, adding that many police do not recognize local journalists or their press passes, let alone freelancers and reporters for small startups.
Susie Cagle learned that the hard way.
“I had presumed a sort of bubble of safety because of my press pass,” said Cagle, an Oakland-based independent reporter, cartoonist and founder of the Graphic Journos collective. Cagle was among the 101 arrestees in Oakland on November 2. “That presumed safety has been burned in the past few days,” said Cagle.
Detailing her experiences for Alternet, Cagle wrote, “When I told my arresting officer that I was press, I was first told, ‘We’ll take care of that in a minute.’ That next minute turned into fifteen hours in two different jails.”

Protesters and now journalists are being arrested and some have been literally physically dragged along the street by NYPD. It seems Mayor Bloomberg is using Egyptian Police style tactics and surcubventing the U.S. Constitution! Now does anybody really believe that Mayor Bloomberg is concerned about journalists safety when the NYPD are dragging Journalists down the street to Paddy wagons! Come on people are we going to allow a public figure to get away with that sort of double talk! If Bloomberg is doing that kind of double talk what else has is he doing! I find it hard to believe the has not been any Journalistic investigating reporting by journalists on Mayor Bloomberg! Is the Journalistic community afraid they'll open up a can of worms! It's important that Journalists have access to any action performed by police agencies and Government Authorities or else it's censorship at it's worst! We are not the Republic of China! What Mayor Bloomberg did today even though this raid was not deadly but it has some similarities of Tititumn Square in China. Today is a sad day for The U.S. Constitution and The Bill of Rights!
#1 Posted by Sits, CJR on Tue 15 Nov 2011 at 03:53 PM
**The Occupy Wall Street protesters are experimenting with new political formats, relationships and spaces.**
Yes; and this too?:
"The Occupy Wall Street protesters are dealing with aggressive, over-weaponized police forces that are organized and empowered by the historically-new, and constitutionally-untested, Dept. of Homeland Security."
#2 Posted by Kurt Heidinger, CJR on Tue 15 Nov 2011 at 04:11 PM
On October 1, while reporting for The New York Times, I followed a surging crowd onto the Brooklyn Bridge. I was arrested alongside 700 others, as was Alternet staff member Kristen Gwynne. Despite wearing a New York Times identification badge and explaining that I was a reporter, I did not have an NYPD press pass and was not allowed to leave the bridge.
Funny, the New York Times had a different take on your activities.
This freelancer, Natasha Lennard, has not been involved in our coverage of Occupy Wall Street in recent days, and we have no plans to use her for future coverage. We have reviewed the past stories to which she contributed and have not found any reasons for concern over that reporting.
So whats the deal, are you lying or is Eileen Murphy of the Times lying or were you just using your press pass as a bullet proof shield to prevent arrest? And if you were, what in God's name is a magazine dedicated to Journalistic review and ethics letting you write for them!
May of these “journalists” like Natasha Lennard have crossed the very big fat line between covering the protests and becoming part of the protests. You don’t get to play “journalists” when its convenient and window smashing anarchists the next, it don’t work that way. You lay with dogs and you get fleas.
#3 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 15 Nov 2011 at 04:25 PM
The Brooklyn Bridge arrest was October 2nd. NYT said they would no longer use Ms. Lennard on October 24th. Care to withdraw your false accusations?
#4 Posted by Thalia, CJR on Tue 15 Nov 2011 at 09:00 PM
This is a guy who paints the probable prescence of frack fluids in Wyoming water as result of excess soap.
http://www.propublica.org/article/epa-finds-fracking-compound-in-wyoming-aquifer/#35956
This kind of pro-corporate slander is god's work to him.
Speaking of propublica, this was a thoughtful read:
http://www.propublica.org/article/explainer-just-how-much-can-the-state-restrict-a-peaceful-protest
#5 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 15 Nov 2011 at 11:21 PM
Who cares?
#6 Posted by Gjoyce, CJR on Wed 16 Nov 2011 at 08:58 AM
I don't understand this sentence.
"Beyond the theoretical challenges, newsrooms are having to adapt to volatile crowds and unpredictable police actions."
What's "theoretical" about the challenge of covering a "diffuse, amorphous, and leaderless" movement that cannot be understood through "traditional media narratives about the nature and structure of protest groups?" That would seem to me a very practical challenge, so I don't get what the word theoretical is doing there.
Is Occupy Wall Street only leaderless in theory? No, it is actually leaderless in the sense that you can't go to the head of it and ask for a statement. That's not a theoretical problem for reporters covering the story, but a very real one.
#7 Posted by Jay Rosen, CJR on Wed 16 Nov 2011 at 09:09 AM
What is happening in that park that is worthy of all this attention? All of this emotional rhetoric? All of this angst? And concern?
It's jut a group of people who have a point of view to express.
As for covering volatile locales and groups? I wrote on this sometime back if one is inclinedl
Going to a cover a Riot? Man Up!
http://mewcomm.typepad.com/mewcomm/2011/01/going-to-cover-a-riot-man-up.html
#8 Posted by mike whatley, CJR on Wed 16 Nov 2011 at 10:17 AM
A couple of examples of how not to cover occupy movements, if you're into those kinds of democratic expression which have worked a little justice into third world dictatorships in the middle east.
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/old-fault-lines.html
"The Occupy Wall Street movement is not wearing well with voters across the country. Only 33% now say that they are supportive of its goals, compared to 45% who say they oppose them...Occupy Wall Street's image suggests is that voters are seeing the movement as more about the 'Occupy' than the 'Wall Street.' The controversy over the protests is starting to drown out the actual message...
As I said yesterday, the "controversy" is a direct result of right wing lizard brain propaganda about Occupiers being sub-human beasts. The drumbeat has been loud and constant, particularly on local news, and it was almost inevitable that the notion would take hold among some people."
http://digbysblog.blogspot.com/2011/11/sanitized-eviction-by-david-atkins.html
"Note the pervasive use of the passive voice, as well as the minimization of the media crackdown and police violence at the scene. Also, of course, the only rowdiness was on the part of the protesters...
This was not a clean, sanitary peaceful operation on rowdy vagrants. This was a violent assault on the civil liberties of Americans peacefully protesting a corrupt system, complete with a coordinated total media blackout...
Today, it's clear that the most powerful forces in America aren't afraid of advocacy against racial or sexual orientation discrimination, or even advocacy against the military-industrial complex. The gigantic wave of protests against the invasion of Iraq were not met with this sort of force.
To touch the nerve of the real powers in modern America, all one need do is target the financial sector and the gross inequality it has produced. That is who really runs the country--not the racists, not the haters, and not the warmongers. The challenge of my generation is to destroy the power of the banking sector as surely as our parents helped destroy the power of the racists, bigots and sexists before them."
Some of the press are too busy talking about hippies and their "public habits" (eww. Gross. Hippies.) to talk about the disgusting elites responsible for for inciting people to walk into the park.
And suddenly, some of the press lacks empathy with protestors when it comes to the reasons for their protest and the oppression of them. It's okay to buck the order in a tinpot dictatorship, but since when has there been a place in America for that revolutionary spirit?
#9 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Wed 16 Nov 2011 at 01:31 PM
This is who America protects:
http://news.firedoglake.com/2011/11/16/two-tiered-justice-financial-prosecutions-at-a-20-year-low/
And that is the real obcenity
#10 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Wed 16 Nov 2011 at 01:45 PM
God Save the Emperor Mayor Bloomberg! By having a half dozen journalist and 300 peaceful Protesters arrested not only crushed Freedom of Speech and Freedom of the Press, he inspired the Occupations across the country and the World! We hope Emperor Bloomberg does another backroom deal at City Hall and runs for a fourth term! OWS needs you and the inspiration you give us to be a stronger movement to over come your corrupted ways! The brave journalists are heroes for standing their ground in the frontlines of rioting NYPD! Standing up for Freedom of the Press and America!
#11 Posted by Sisto Maximo, CJR on Wed 16 Nov 2011 at 03:15 PM
@ Sisto Maximo
Yes, thank Bloomberg! For without him the OWS movement could have ended quickly and instead dragged out just long enough for the organizations antics: child prostituion rings, sexual assaults, arson, pushing old women down staircases and murder to completey discredit itself to the American public.
The Occupy Wall Street movement is not wearing well with voters across the country. Only 33% now say that they are supportive of its goals, compared to 45% who say they oppose them. That represents an 11 point shift in the wrong direction for the movement's support compared to a month ago when 35% of voters said they supported it and 36% were opposed. Most notably independents have gone from supporting Occupy Wall Street's goals 39/34, to opposing them 34/42.
Three cheers for Bloomberg ... HUZZAH!! HUZZAH!! HUZZAH!!
#12 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Wed 16 Nov 2011 at 04:15 PM
Man, MikeH is reaching for whatever he can out of the gateway pundit's fruit basket and chucking it against the wall.
You have the police who've been shooing the drug addicts to protest areas, you have the right wing blogs taking pictures and making stuff up, and you have the msm who's been over emphasizing the marginal elements (many of which were corralled their by the police) and under emphasizing the repression, and you have the f'in black bloc' who aren't part of the ows protest, they're crashing it:
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2011/11/12/1035907/-To-the-black-bloc-anarchists,-F***-OFF!-This-is-Occupy,-NOT-Destroy
Have you poisoned the minds of the public before they have a chance to identify with the protesters enough yet?
#13 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Wed 16 Nov 2011 at 06:11 PM
Ah, you gotta love Charley Pierce lately:
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/occupy-wall-street-media-coverage-6563778
"In response, of course, the mainstream media chewed its cud judiciously on the sidelines, so that people wouldn't yell at them on the radio. Here's The New York Times, writing in fluent oatmeal, using the passive voice like a lullaby.
No tents were touched until 1:45 a.m., the police said, giving the protesters time to gather their belongings. Other teams of officers were seen gathering on the perimeter to move in if arrests were needed in the park.
How nice of them to be so thoughtful. Really. Shame they had to run all the reporters out before they began.
Where are the protectors of the First Amendment when the mayor and the NYPD adopt tactics pioneered by the Egyptian security forces? Where's the Poynter Institute been? (Hint: Losing Jim Romenesko over quotation marks.) Where's the Columbia Journalism Review? (Hint: Scaring Poynter into losing Jim Romenesko over quotation marks.) Where are all the talk-radio types who have conniption fits when Hugo Chavez closes a TV station in Venezuela, or who luxuriate in fantasies of how the jackbooted thugs at the FCC are scheming to bring back The Fairness Doctrine — boogedy-boogedy! — on the issue of reporters being locked out by law enforcement from covering a major story?
If you want to see how good the noise machine really is, how quickly it can be ignited, and how thoroughly it has intimidated the "respectable" press, you could do a lot worse than study its operations over the past month or so. Remarkably, the libertarian instincts of the conservative movement have been strangely quiet on the topic of a military action taken against peaceful protest."
http://www.esquire.com/blogs/politics/oscar-ramiro-ortega-hernandez-6564000
"The mirror-image campaigns to tar the Tea Party and the "Occupy" movement are based, in no small part, on guilt by association. But nobody anywhere near the Tea Party ever took a shot at the White House.
1) What "mirror-image campaigns"? Can Smith find an entire international news operation that dedicated itself to tar the Tea Party? Can he find a major metropolitan daily that took it upon itself to demolish the Tea Party every single day on its garish front page?
2) No. They just settled for taking shots at members of Congress. And, luckily, the cops caught some of them in the act. And, well, you know.
Knock this **** off please."
#14 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Thu 17 Nov 2011 at 03:34 AM