When Opoka Christopher Amanjur, twenty-four, joined the Juba Post, a biweekly newspaper in South Sudan, as an editor, he went through each page of the newspaper, circling and underlining the text with a red pen. “Syntax errors, poor designing,and no story structure,” he recalled. “There were just so many mistakes.” The publisher, Charles Rehan Surur, told him, “You don’t need to tell me what’s wrong. Come and change the paper.”
The first edition of the Juba Post was published four years ago in 2005, on the same day that the longest running conflict in Africa ended. The Comprehensive Peace Agreement (CPA), signed by the Khartoum Government and the Sudan People’s Liberation Movement SPLM, ended a twenty-two-year-long civil war between North Sudan and South Sudan that had taken almost two million lives. For the Christian South, long politically and economically marginalized by the Arab power brokers in the North, the CPA brought a measure of autonomy, the waiver of Sharia law, and a greater share of the oil revenue.
Conditions in the region are improving at a snail’s pace. The war that displaced four million people also ravaged the South’s landscape. All of the estimated twenty kilometers of tarred road in the region are in Juba, the capital city. And while military commanders have transitioned from the bush to more comfortable hotels and houses, most people still remain in the wilderness, entrenched in tribal rivalries, without roads, electricity, or water. Only a handful of businessmen with generators are able to work after sunset.
As the South takes baby steps towards recovery, journalists are setting higher standards of work. Amanjur, who studied journalism at Kampala University in Uganda (where he fled in 1992 to escape the war), has launched a training program through the Juba Post to teach basic reporting skills, free of charge. “The young lads were so excited that they would mix opinion with news in their stories,” he said. “The editorial board never checked this.” The program now includes reporting and writing skills, ethical reporting, news communication skills, sociology, and macroeconomics.
The Juba Post’s office is tucked between a messy settlement of conical huts and the dusty army barracks. Fortified by a few laptops and noisy table fans, the newspaper runs on the energy of its young staffers, most of whom, like Amanjur, spent their childhood in exile in Uganda and Kenya.
One trainee at the paper, Philip Atem Bier, twenty-three, studied public administration in Kampala. Bier is a good writer, but he still struggles with journalistic pieces. “Turning information from the field into a story is very difficult,” he said.
Despite the training program’s progress, money and logistics still pose daily problems. Reporters like Bier are paid by the story; only the editors are on contract. Very often, payments are delayed. “If you are not a pro-government paper, then you don’t get government advertisements,” said Surur, who has to depend on endorsements from NGOs and private companies. “We don’t have a car,” he added.
Electricity is also a modern luxury. The Post has been lucky; it currently shares the same power line as General Paulino Matiep, the second-in-command of the South’s army. Not too long ago, the paper spent a quarter of its sales on gas for the generator.
The Post faces bigger, more systemic problems, though. Media freedom in the South is controlled by the officials in North Sudan. All outlets are registered with the National Press Council in Khartoum, which also supervises a mandatory exam for reporters. (Many poorly trained applicants of the South fail the exam.) News and views supporting the International Criminal Court are squashed. (The ICC has issued an arrest warrant against Sudanese President Omar al-Bashir for war crimes and crimes against humanity in Darfur.)
Additionally, inspectors are assigned to keep a check on troublesome “independent” papers. Alfred Taban, the editor of the Khartoum Monitor, a national daily, dutifully leaves his office at around five in the evening and allows the inspectors to do their job. “They edit the paper for the next day,” he said, almost apathetically.
Like many southerners, Taban is waiting for North Sudan and South Sudan to split. With the international spotlight largely focused on Darfur, the north-south deal that ended the civil war and created the semi-autonomous southern authority has taken something of a backseat. But it will come to a head in 2011, when southerners will hold a referendum to decide whether to remain a part of Sudan, or to secede.
While the National Unity Government of Sudan, formed after the peace agreement, is comprised of both Northern and Southern leaders, it is President Bashir’s Islamist National Congress Party (NCP), and not the SPLM, represented by former rebels, that makes and enforces the country’s rules.
Many in the South believe that they will always play second fiddle to the North, which is predominantly Arab and perceived to be prejudiced against Africans—both African Muslims in Darfur and the Southern Christians. Both these regions have been underdeveloped and marginalized since Sudan’s independence in 1956, and opinions about the impending referendum run strong. “I want to be ruled by my own black people,” said Mawadri Martin John, twenty-three, a student majoring in rural development at Juba University. “I do not want Islam in my life.”
“It is the best time to unlock ourselves from the Arabs,” said Hans Martin Aligo Abe, a member of the Southern Sudan Legislative Assembly. “We will take them head on.”
Abe has the scars from a string of civil wars in the Sudan, Rwanda, Burundi and the Congo. The sides of his ears have been sliced off, he said, by the North Sudan forces.
There is, however, concern that South Sudan in its present underdeveloped state may not be ready for the split—that it could lead to further internal clashes between Southern tribes. But for many like Abe, independence cannot wait anymore. “We have been swimming in our dirty water for very long,” he said. “We will continue to swim until things improve.”
- 1
- 2


An eye-opener. Didn't know that anybody would want to run a newspaper from Juba. The story shows that whether in Juba, Jakarta, or Johannesburg, journalists struggle to walk the tight rope. Hope Juba's dream for a Journalism School comes true. Keep such stories coming.
#1 Posted by DaisyChang, CJR on Mon 4 May 2009 at 10:41 PM
An eye-opener. Didn't know that anybody would want to run a newspaper from Juba. The story shows that whether in Juba, Jakarta, or Johannesburg, journalists struggle to walk the tight rope. Hope Juba's dream for a Journalism School comes true. Keep such stories coming.
#2 Posted by DaisyChang, CJR on Mon 4 May 2009 at 10:44 PM
Low pay, high risks. Why would anyone want to be a journalist in conflict places. Everything is on-line on the Net. And so accessible. Maybe journalism has its own thrills.
#3 Posted by JannatHussain, CJR on Mon 4 May 2009 at 11:00 PM
What is the North Sudan perspective needs to be fleshed out!
#4 Posted by MirAdam, CJR on Tue 5 May 2009 at 08:56 AM
i appreciate your services and acknowledge that you have a lot of abstacles affecting your role of mirroring society. i would suggest you seek help of interested people from different counties to help feed you with information for publishing.
#5 Posted by poni Allen Ladu, CJR on Tue 5 May 2009 at 09:07 AM
a story well told! but why would Juba Post shy away from the opportunity to lead the popular struggle for self-determination? The fourth estate us a powerful change agent. Seems more of a political compulsion than an attempt in ethical restraint.
On the side, wonder what is the literacy rate in Sudan is? I'm assuming the Juba is not a vernacular, is English a much used language there?
#6 Posted by jitender, CJR on Tue 5 May 2009 at 02:29 PM
It just goes on to show that when someone is truly passionate about his/her profession, there are absolutely no circumstances harsh enough to stop him/her.
I can’t help but mention that even during Indian independence movement many newspapers were started with the aim of moblising public opinion…but to no one’s surprise were soon banned by the British government and those involved in airing their opinion were subjected to brutal treatment. But nothing could stop those Indian freedom fighters! In fact one of the newspapers called Kesari, which was started back in 1880 with the aim of national wakening, will be celebrating its 129th anniversary this year!!
#7 Posted by shweta chaubey, CJR on Tue 5 May 2009 at 05:48 PM
Fate of this newspaper will speak for times to come in South Sudan, specially so when people in this part of world are still killing in hundreds over issues like cattle raiding and counter-raiding.
With increasing rate of literacy and primacy of English as language of instruction in South Sudan, Juba post can look forward to a sizable readership over the period of time along with forward march of nation towards better days. Still it is yet to be seen if government continues to allow press to have its deserved place in the scheme of things, one can just hope that government resist temptation of imposing censorship on newspapers having independent voice.
#8 Posted by Rohit Kaliyar, CJR on Tue 5 May 2009 at 07:33 PM
Newspaper or Press has always played an important role in struggle against repression and authoritarian form of government. Given the technological advancement and advent of internet, the media has got more teeth.
In highly authoritarian setup like in Sudan, it has always been difficult for the people to gain proper education and understand things in wider-perspective. One should have a wider-perspective as a journalist to be able to be neutral in his or her writings and for this education is must. The people (read journalist) tend to get emotionally attached with the story they are working upon and here is where problem begins. It helps government to be suppress the newspaper and impose censorship. To effectively mitigate the chances of getting censored, it is important to present news as news.
Newspapers follow editorial policy that adheres to local laws, which helps in maintaining decorum of sorts. Ethics and policies without any laws lead to nowhere because everything is open to individual perspective, opinion and judgement. So, such a law should exist. It shouldn't be oppressive and shouldn't impose censorship but should act as a guideline towards ethical reporting.
Sudan has a long way to travel and Juda Post had already embarked on a journey. And this is the time to raise voice in an ethical way.
#9 Posted by Palak Mathur, CJR on Tue 5 May 2009 at 08:03 PM
What on earth does "decent culturally and politically" mean?
All governments are the same- some more obvious than others.
#10 Posted by Nilaksh, CJR on Tue 5 May 2009 at 08:38 PM
journalism cannot exist in a vacuum in a country like Sudan. when every section of society is "operating without law", journalism alone cannot operate to a significantly higher standard. journalists at the Juba post are pioneers, but they have to be patient. and they need help from the rest of the world
#11 Posted by Joydeep, CJR on Thu 7 May 2009 at 12:15 AM
The Juba Post continues as it has lazily like a snakely river that meanders on its rugged flow to the ocean....It has its struggles, and this kinds of struggles are commonplace in all media houses. However, it is worth recognizing that, the time for the forth arm of government to take its place in Southern Sudan has yet to come.
Had this time come, I am disappointed that the media would have done rather a terrible job at being a society watchdog of the activities, decisions and intentions of the executive, judiciary and legislature. All the other three arms of government are so terribly abusing their powers that they themselves have failed and are still failing the more to notice the evil they are allowing to continue.
The Media in Southern Sudan on its part can not and has not the capacity to watch over these events, actions deliberate or not.
I will give one such example: More recently the government of Southern Sudan soonest referendum results were released indicating a landslide victory for secession, it unveiled a new development plan. This development plan did not have as its core the prioritisation of development objectives. It has as its center piece the construction of a NEW CAPITAL CITY for the new NATION. Reporters everywhere have been swept along by the euphoria of a new capital city, and all swarmed to report on the new design, a design that left so much to be desired. (I saw the design posted on facebook, and the comments were varied, but most condemned the idea--not the design which was stupid, lacking in taste, architecturally deafening, blinding and dumbing, the project would cost over 10 BILLION UNITED STATES DOLLARS) Today GOSS entirely depends on oil revenue to pay salaries, and the Minister for Labor and Public Service Awut Deng said that no government of the world should pass salary budgets, which GoSS is encouraging. However, this development plan is welcome, BUT ALAS!!! We still don't have schools, roads, health services, doctors, teachers, we don't produce any agriculture goods, our farmers don't have tools even for basic farming (hoes and fertilizers), no mechanized agriculture. No jobs in for graduates, poor education system (a system inherited from the north that needs a complete overhaul), no factories, industries...NOTHING....we only brag about our oil revenues.
Reporters have not picked up on this simple analogy. Every reporter is very excited about the new city, and beyond the speech of the GoSS Minister for Information Dr. Barnaba Benjamin Marial calling for a city befitting a new nation, reporters had little to write.
This in my opinion is the problem with journalism in Southern Sudan, and even in other parts of the world. Reporters are not equipped to ask the right questions, never have the appropriate analytical skills, reporters can not dissect issues for the public to make more and better informed decisions...this in my experience is what is crippling the Journalism profession in Southern Sudan.
That said, the way forward is very gloom and grim. I know for a fact that the GoSS Capital City design to have been unveiled soonest the referendum results were announced is a calculated and well thought out strategy. It is also a fact that for the plan to have been rolled out so early on, assurances of funding and implementation must have been reached or nearly concluded. If this is true then, there is another fact that surfaces. The fact that either the donors are faster to fund development projects that enrich their own nations through grants for funding such massive projects, or that I and other tax paying Southern Sudanese will be the ones to service the debt being incurred by the Government of Southern Sudan now. 10Billion United States Dollars is enough money to lure all corrupted minds, and few just start ringing in my mind when i look at the digits involved. The Cost of building a new capital city should not be at the expense of the lives and welfare
#12 Posted by Opoka Christopher A, CJR on Tue 15 Feb 2011 at 02:33 AM