John Farley, a reporter with WNET/Thirteen’s MetroFocus, was standing on the sidewalk interviewing two women who had been pepper sprayed during the Occupy Wall Street protest when it happened to him.
For Natasha Lennard, a freelancer for The New York Times’s City Blog, it happened as she live-tweeted events while walking alongside the crowd of protestors “taking” the Brooklyn Bridge.
And for Alternet freelancer Kristen Gwynne, who was among the bridge crowd, it happened while she was talking with protest participants.
Swept up by the NYPD along with Occupy Wall Street protesters, these journalists were kettled, cuffed, and bussed to a police station on where they were charged with disorderly conduct. Farley spent eight hours in jail on September 24; Lennard—who had Times editors working to free her—was in custody for five hours, and Gwynne for twice that long, on October 1.
It seems journalists themselves aren’t the only ones struggling to determine who, exactly, is a journalist. The three reporters are among the hundreds of individuals who have been arrested at the Occupy Wall Street protests in recent weeks. Each was there to cover the event, yet all three were treated in a manner that police tend to avoid with working journalists.
Why did this happen? Part of the answer is simply a byproduct of the everyone’s-a-journalist rhetoric that defines our media these days.
The more proximate answer, though, has to do with how the NYPD has decided to determine who is a journalist. Simply put, without a press credential issued by the NYPD’s Office of the Deputy Commissioner for Public Information (DCPI), you are not a journalist in the eyes of the police.
The press credential permits journalists to cross police and fire lines, although it doesn’t guarantee that the pass-holder can cross those lines—it’s ultimately up to the officers at the scene, but with a pass you have the best chance to do so. To get this credential, you must submit an application and six published clips that prove you have covered breaking or spot news in the past. Peter Bekker, the consulting director of the New York Press Club, says the credential is essentially worthless since it doesn’t guarantee reporters access to anything.
The cases of Farley, Lennard, and Gwynne seem to indicate otherwise.
When Farley was arrested on September 24, he showed the officer his WNET identification. He and his colleague, Sam Lewis, had been using this identification effectively to move about the protest grounds throughout the afternoon. Lewis, who was not caught behind the police net, was with a pack of credentialed journalists, all of whom told the officers that Farley was covering the protest and should be let go. Lewis also called DCPI to see if they could get Farley released. In each instance, Farley and Lewis say they were told by officers that, “We know he’s a journalist, but he doesn’t have a credential. There’s nothing we can do.”
Lennard, who was arrested last Saturday, tells a similar story:
I was on the bridge trapped without a press pass. I only had my New York Times identification and they were just doing a broad sweep. They weren’t particularly interested in the fact that I was with the media; they wanted to sweep the bridge.
When she made it clear to her arresting officer she was with the press and that her editor had already called the NYPD to get her free, the officer told her it would be sorted out when she got to the precinct. While Lennard’s processing was expedited once she was at the precinct, she still was charged with disorderly conduct for her presence on the bridge.
Gwynne, too, raised the issue with an officer on the scene who she says told her, if she was media, she should have been separate from the protesters, standing with other journalists who were in a group on the side of the bridge. Unlike Farley and Lennard, Gwynne says she was there to support the protesters as well as cover them, and felt it was fair that she faced the same consequences; she says she wanted to witness what happened to the protesters after arrest.

In 2004 I saw a well-known journalist (@ Nation, Mother Jones) with a very large press credential around her neck 'kettled' in orange plastic netting by the police and arrested after being left to sit, along with other kettled, at the no RNC (Repub Convention). The crowd had been large but quiet and herded down the street, only to be seized and kettled, [like Occupy Wall Streeters say they were, on the Bklyn Bridge]. The cops simply refused to let the journalist go, despite her very visible NYPD press credentials. (I was a video witness). Nothing new going on now. Why are press credentials required? And why are people with cameras targeted by police?
#1 Posted by lauran, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 06:36 PM
Moral of the story?
Follow the rules or go to jail.
What's the story here?
#2 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 06:44 PM
Looks to me like the issue is police making indiscriminate, mass arrests. If that's what the NYPD has been doing, then special credentials differentiating "journalists" from "people" are counter-productive.
If journalists get special rights and special access and a get-out-of-jail-free card, they will not properly understand what it's like not to have those things, and their coverage will reflect the point of view that comes with that privilege.
#3 Posted by edward ericson jr., CJR on Sat 8 Oct 2011 at 09:37 AM
For once, I agree with Edward...
The issue is whether or not the police violated everybody's right...
Not whether or not some self-described "journalists" were arrested
If the police broke the law, then I'm on the protesters' side of this debate. The people who made or ordered the illegal arrests need to be identified and prosecuted
On the other hand, if the crowd was orchestrating an illegal and disruptive hissy-fit, then a little jail time goes a long way, education-wise..... Especially on Riker's Island.
#4 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sat 8 Oct 2011 at 10:52 AM
I was the one, with my lawyer, Norman Siegel, who brought the complaint into Federal Court against the Bloomberg administration and the Police Department. I raised the question: " Why the NYPD was the sole agency who determined who is a journalist and who is not." The mainstream media in New York, like they always does kept silent. I am still will like is the New York Civil Liberty will like to challenged to take out the NYPD as the agency who decided who is a journalist. The NYPD do deal with journslist who are their favorite.
#5 Posted by Rafael Martínez Alequín, CJR on Sun 9 Oct 2011 at 11:00 AM
Rafael wrote: Why the NYPD was the sole agency who determined who is a journalist and who is not."?
padikiller: Because they control crime scenes.
As I see it, the cops have two options:
1. Keep everybody out of crime scenes until the investigation is complete, or
2. Use their discretion to let people they trust into crime scenes.
What's the scandal here? Why isn't option 2 better than option 1?
Option 3 - letting anybody who calls himself a "journalist" traipse around crime scenes - is an obvious no-go.
Now I'm not condoning police abuse in any way... If the cops acted illegally then the press should go nuts to hold them accountable.
#6 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sun 9 Oct 2011 at 11:34 AM
Seems to me that the Police are going out of their way to antagonise the press because they do not enjoy being used for this type of Duty !
White shirted Officers misleading the " protesters " and expecting the Blue shirted Officers to clear up their " Cat & Mouse " tactics is never going to sit well with the conscientious Officers !
There are going to be many " Class Actions " of " ILLEGAL ARREST " when the #OSW reaches Critical Mass . As mentioned in @skippydetour and parrabuddy.blogspot #OSW needs to establish a way to " Marshall " their protesters so as to avoid " Criminal Elements" infiltrating and using the " Marches " to create Mayhem as was done to the London Student Marches that started peacefully and were turned into Riots .
Time that Bankers faced up to the Troubles they have created for us ALL and some Bankers getting Jail Time will curb the ambitions of the other 99% of their numbers !
WHITE COLLAR CRIME is not exempt from Justice but then Money buys NYPD laptops and Bias !
#7 Posted by Skippy ( @skippydetour ), CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 09:38 AM
It bothers me that so much is being credentialed and related to licensing and certification any more, it seems that a writer, a journalist, paid or not, is only asking for their first amendment writes to be acknowledged. I have desk top published a newsletter sent out to 200 folks, I have had letters to the editors published, I have written and read poetry to the general audience. I have never had a news story published other than when I reported events of my own or others at my own free will, I have not gotten paid for most of it, I don't have a degree in it, although writing is what I have done my whole entire life, none the less I am known far and wide for my writing. It is a part of my advocacy work. So who is a journalist. I am not sure that we should squeeze that into any little box and say this is the criteria. I think that is the wrong thing to do. Anyone that is reporting news, or that other news writers are relying on for one reason or another and whom is also a writer, I think maybe they should fit the criteria? I don't know, you all might think I am just simply crazy too?
#8 Posted by Janie Lee, M.Ed. , CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 12:19 PM
It's pretty clear that someone is trying to control the message.
#9 Posted by Flower, CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 02:10 PM
Why doesn't the NYPA issue credentials?
#10 Posted by Trew, CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 02:36 PM
Because the NYPA isn't responsible for protecting citizens, maintaining public order or preserving evidence, that's why.
You guys seriously can't understand why the police don't let anyone who calls himself a "journalist" traipse around in crime scenes? Or why the police don't let outside agencies decide who can traipse around in crime scenes?
For real?
Think about it a little, guys. This one's a no-brainer.
#11 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 03:03 PM
The police do have a job to do, but just because I am a citizen police even if I was a writer journalist that would give me no more rights than others, I think our constitutional rights must be for all of us and not just the few and so did Benjamin Franklin and others that risked their life for the news. Some of them almost got arrested too, and I once had a journalism professor tell me that anyone that was never arrested wasn't a journalist in the first place. He taught it in one of the best programs in the nation, sorry to dissappoint you all, but I still don't think that the credentials are what really matter, it is the work that you do, and your integrity. Shutting people out of things most often tends to have the opposite affect than was intended and ends up shutting some of the very best and most dedicated out, but that is generally for political reasons. That never made for the best news in the first place, the actual reporter wants to get to what the political corruption is that underlies the reasoning for it in the first place, they want to get the real story and not just the one the government says that they can have. That is what a good journalist calls propaganda and rhetoric, isn't it, come to think about it that is not ethical either.
#12 Posted by Janie Lee, M.Ed. , CJR on Tue 11 Oct 2011 at 02:07 PM
For the past few weeks I have been tracking arrests of journalists at #Occupy events around the country.
http://storify.com/jcstearns/tracking-journalist-arrests-during-the-occupy-prot
You can send tips to me on Twitter @jcstearns.
#13 Posted by Josh Stearns, CJR on Tue 11 Oct 2011 at 03:41 PM
Staring to look to me like we have a bona fide mafia running New York City and they run around with weapons and badges and aren't held accountable for their actions. Can we say oppression?
#14 Posted by Arletta, CJR on Sun 13 Nov 2011 at 10:28 PM