Bad news is often good news for journalists. Last week’s assassination of Lebanese opposition leader Pierre Gemayel may have been exactly that for Al-Jazeera English, the Westernized cousin of the channel the Bush administration loves to hate.
It wasn’t so much that AJE triumphed in its coverage of the latest Lebanese crisis — far from it — but it did show signs of finding its footing after an uncertain first week. Since AJE went live Nov. 15, it has looked more like Bob Geldof TV than a channel dedicated to “fearless journalism” that is “setting the news agenda,” as promised in the self-congratulatory promos. (Full disclosure: I contributed a commentary to this week’s edition of the AJE media criticism show Listening Post.)
While it has been refreshing to see reports from places like Darfur, Myanmar and Zimbabwe, the channel was crammed with so many obscure features from forgotten corners of the world that it was beginning to resemble a UN video service. News flash: There’s a reason some of these stories are “ignored” by other channels.
In an interview in early November, Wadah Khanfar, director general of the Al-Jazeera Channels, told me that the new English service would have a global rather than Arab perspective, with an emphasis on the “global South.” That was evident in week one, as staffers pursued a self-conscious — sometimes excruciating — emphasis on being the un-CNN.
Launch day was particularly disappointing. The weakness was not in bias, as critics warned in advance, but in the breadth and depth of news coverage. Soft news — if you could even use the term for a series of timeless features — ruled the day. With all the delays, the channel had plenty of “exclusive” (but largely news-less) interviews and evergreens in the can and it seemed determined to use them, come hell or high water (literally, since that day’s Japanese tsunami was largely ignored). Pieces on an obscure tribe in Brazil and Chinese kids who drive fast were endlessly looped. There were almost hourly live shots from Darfur (because they were there) and the same spot on gas shortages in Zimbabwe ran over and over.
The magazine-style topical shows that occupy the second half of each hour showed great potential to add context and perspective to global developments, digging into important stories largely ignored in the West, but the breaking coverage itself was lacking. Things improved as the week went on, but the channel remained heavy on compassion and light on news.
Then came the Gemayel assassination. Its boss may claim AJE doesn’t present an “Arab” perspective, but the Qatar-based channel damn well should be outperforming Western rivals on its own turf. The first hours after the assassination showed little evidence of that.
In fact, AJE — which North American audiences can see only on the Web — seemed to be repeating the mistakes of both Western and Arab broadcasters. Two-thirds of the channel’s presenters are Brits and it was Sky News veteran David Foster, rather than an Arab journalist, who was sent in to anchor coverage from Beirut. Such “parachute journalism” is a key criticism of Western reporting from the Arab world. Foster promptly mispronounced the names of Beirut’s two largest newspapers.
Beirut correspondent Rula Amin, a Palestinian who previously served as CNN’s roving Middle East correspondent, then briefly strayed into journalistically dangerous territory when she described Pierre Gemayel as a “martyr” and somewhat fawningly kept referring to the slain Christian politician with the honorific “sheikh.” Conservative bloggers in the U.S. have been sharpening their knives for AJE, which a columnist on Accuracy in Media’s site called “enemy media, plain and simple” out to “infiltrate our country.” Adjectives like “martyr” — no matter the context — will only feed that mindset.
During live coverage of last Thursday’s dramatic mass funeral-cum-political rally, which drew hundreds of thousands to Beirut’s city center, Al-Jazeera English and its competitors — BBC World and CNN International — appeared virtually identical, relying on the same pool feed as the Arabic channels. But it was in the analysis and depth of coverage that AJE finally began to distinguish itself.
While Western channels focused largely on the obvious confrontation between the anti-Syrian faction that Gemayel represented and Hezbollah, AJE’s other Beirut correspondent, Zeina Khodr, provided valuable insight into the way in which the assassination had exacerbated divisions within the Christian community as well.
But the biggest difference between AJE and its competitors came as the funeral ended. It was here that Jazeera’s home court advantage came into play.