Take, for example, a pair of questions from John DiStaso, a veteran political reporter at the Manchester Union Leader (a debate co-host), directed at Herman Cain. The question was strong, with a full list of wanted details:
“Could you be specific regarding ages, income levels what is your specific—specific—Social Security reform plan, with regard to raising the retirement age—what ages—cutting benefits, and at what income level means testing cutting in?”
“Let’s fix the problem. And that is to restructure Social Security,” Cain began, with an answer that included nary an age or a dollar figure.
A brief “You didn’t answer my question” could have done wonders. But King soon chimed in with “we’re going to keep the conversation moving,” leaving Cain’s retirement security plans entirely unsketched.
Just after that non-exchange was a question from Jennifer Vaughn, an anchor at WMUR, the local ABC affiliate, and another co-host. Her question was succinct, the kind that would seem to demand a yes or no response.
“The treasury department says the United States will hit its credit limit on August 2. Do you believe that we will ultimately have to raise the debt ceiling?” she asked Governor Romney.
“I believe we will not raise the debt ceiling unless the president finally, finally, is wiling to be a leader on issues that the American people care about,” Romney began his sidestepping response.
Vaughn made a second attempt: “Governor, what happens if you don’t raise it? What happens then? Is it ok not to?”
“Well, what happens if we continue to spend, time and time again, year and year again, more money than you take in?” was Romney’s second artful dodge.
Again, straightforwardly pointing out that the fact went unanswered could have done wonders. Something like: “Governor, you didn’t answer my question: what I’m asking is if you believe the US will eventually have to raise the debt ceiling, or do you favor default?”
So, despite King’s plea at the top of the proceedings, the candidates declined to answer the questions as they were asked.
For debate veterans, that’s certainly not a surprise—it’s the normal state of affairs. And that’s the way it will stay until debate moderators learn to stick up for themselves, their questions, and the voters by pointing out when candidates just brush by.

To me, the miraculous thing about this debate was the fact that all of the candidates refused to attack each other and united in laying waste to Obama.
Perhaps these politicos are actually, finally getting the Tea Party message. Anybody but Obama.
If they keep up like this, whoever gets the GOP nomination will lay waste to the Dems next year. Landslide city.
Gingrich also made it clear that the GOP sights are squarely set on a supermajority in the Senate and a crushing majority in the House.
Until and unless Obama reverses the commie madness and starts lowering taxes and spending to foster private sector employment, the Dems are walking into a slaughterhouse.
#1 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 14 Jun 2011 at 07:04 AM
Except for Bachmann's performance, I found the debate completely boring and predictable. Let's review. All the candidates are in favor of lowering taxes. Wow, that's a shocker! This is so predictable it's tiring. There is no problem that can't be solved by lowering taxes. Of course, this will just make the debt and deficit situation dramatically worse, as proven by the Bush II tax cuts. But don't worry, we'll 'grow' out of it due to all the economic activity that will be generated. (And, if that doesn't work, the tooth fairy will leave money under our pillows.) And of course, regulation is killing jobs. We don't need no stinking regulation. Never mind that unregulated derivatives markets helped drive the housing bubble, and amplified the crash; never mind that deregulated mortgage markets led to liar and nina loans. Never mind that the repeal of Glass-Steagal led to larger banks able to take on more risk for themselves and the rest of the economy. Forget about that. Oppressive regulation is holding back business. It has nothing to do with weak demand for products. It's all about regulation.
And, oh yeah, Romney's health care plan in Massachusetts is nothing like the Obama health care plan. Really. Honestly. Just ask Mitt. And they all want to repeal the Affordable Care Act. Another shocker.
Bachmann, on the other hand, proved that she is not out on the fringe (at least relative to the other candidates). She came across as a more knowledgeable Sarah Palin, a big step forward for her candidacy.
#2 Posted by Rick Sullivan, CJR on Tue 14 Jun 2011 at 09:56 AM
I thought Ron Paul came across as presidential and powerful when he said the president should decide about pulling troops out of Afghanistan and not rely solely on military advice. Ron Paul certainly didn't dodge this question. "...I wouldn't wait for my generals. I'm the Commander in Chief. I make the decisions. I tell the generals what to do and I'd bring them home as quickly as possible and I'd get them out of Iraq as well. I wouldn't start a war in Libya. I'd quit bombing Yemen. I'd quit bombing Pakistan. I'd start taking care of people here at home.."
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TIC5eIUue60&feature=youtu.be
#3 Posted by Kim, CJR on Tue 14 Jun 2011 at 11:09 AM
If you forewarn them that evading the question will result in the reporter providing their answer in explicit english .
#4 Posted by cjjoy, CJR on Wed 15 Jun 2011 at 03:48 AM
Hear hear, Kim. There was only one candidate worth a damn on that stage — one man thinking for himself and not compromising his sound principles. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8LcwnePeMTU
#5 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Wed 15 Jun 2011 at 01:08 PM