That sound you just heard is another big-name political reporter rolling over for fear of creating a scene. MSNBC’s “First Read” reported today on a back and forth between the New York Times’ Elisabeth Bumiller and Senator John McCain, concerning an alleged conversation McCain had in 2004 about running as vice president on John Kerry’s presidential ticket.
McCain has always denied that such a conversation took place, but on a campaign stop this morning, pressed by a voter if he would consider Kerry as his veep in this election cycle, McCain changed his story. He said that he wouldn’t consider Kerry as his running mate because Kerry is “a liberal Democrat… I am a conservative Republican. When we had that conversation in 2004, that’s why I never even considered such a thing.”
Bumiller picked up on the contradiction, and when she asked McCain about it later, the presidential candidate got a little testy. The end of the brief back and forth went like this:
Bumiller: Can you describe the conversation?McCain: No, of course not. I don’t describe private conversations.
Bumiller: Okay. Can I ask you ”
McCain: Why should I? Then there’s no such thing as a private conversation. Is there (inaudible) if you have a private conversation with someone, and then they come and tell you. I don’t know that that’s a private conversation. I think that’s a public conversation.
Bumiller: Okay. Can I ask you about your why you’re so angry?
McCain: Pardon me?
Bumiller: Nevermind, nevermind.
McCain: I mean, it’s well known. Everybody knows. It’s been well chronicled a thousand times. John Kerry asked if I would consider being his running mate.
Bumiller: Okay.
Way to hold the powerful to account for changing the story, Elisabeth! On second thought, nevermind, nevermind.





It was a pretty cheeky question in the first place. McCain will do wonders for his base if he continues ripping the reporter from the NYT.
Posted by marvelgoose
on Fri 7 Mar 2008 at 09:04 PM
Another typical hit piece from McLearyland...
I don't remember Paul McLeary or anyone at CJR jumping on John Kerry over this meeting in 2004...
Apparently, CJR's political interest is only raised when a GOP candidate can be injured...
CJR is nothing but a mealy-mouthed liberal hack tool...
Posted by padikiller
on Fri 7 Mar 2008 at 09:56 PM
I am a colleague of Elisabeth's at the New York Times. I will keep this short and to the point.
I have watched the videotape and read the transcript of her exchange with Senator McCain. I would urge readers of this item to do the same. It’s not just that the piece is unfair to Elisabeth – which it is. It is simply wrong.
First, the “never mind” quote upon which this piece is based is taken out of context. She is not saying “never mind” in regard to the question she posed about the Kerry-McCain conversation. It is in response to what McCain said when she asked him why he was so angry.
Second of all, the exchange was longer. Elisabeth went back and forth with him a few times before it became clear that he had said all he was going to say. (I can attest to that after having been in many similar situations with candidates, including Senator McCain; at a certain point you are done and it’s time to get to the typewriter, uh, laptop).. That is why everyone else who reported on this episode described him as “testy” or “angry:” it’s because Elisabeth kept pressing him on it.
And third of all, she didn’t roll over or back down. She reported the whole thing in a story in The New York Times – which in my opinion, is precisely what a campaign reporter should do.
Elisabeth raised the question on her own and pushed it with the senator – without, as far as I can tell, any back-up from any other reporter on the plane. If there are any Columbia Journalism students reading this, I would urge them to ignore the article and check out what Elisabeth did. It is a model of good political reporting that one would think – rather than be subject to unfair attacks based on a misreading of the facts – would earn praise from a Web site affiliated with one the nation’s preeminent journalism schools.
Adam Nagourney
Posted by sockpuppet
on Sat 8 Mar 2008 at 10:58 AM
I just watched the tape. Bumiller clearly pressed McCain on the question. She didn't back off until it was clear he wasn't going to address it. She didn't roll over. She did her job and did it well.
Ed Tibbetts
Posted by Iowa Stater
on Sat 8 Mar 2008 at 12:01 PM
The only way that Ms. Bumiller could have satisifed the screwy liberal McLearyites would have been by pinning McCain on the floor and beating him senseless with her tape recorder.
It is a sad commentary on the state of a purported "watchdog of professional journalism" when it decides that the NY Slimes isn't hard enough on GOP candidates for its taste!...
Posted by padikiller
on Sat 8 Mar 2008 at 01:29 PM