Much of President Obama’s press conference earlier today was devoted to the latest partisan fight in DC over the American Jobs Act. But there were also some good, wide-ranging questions asked of the president. ABC’s Jake Tapper, leaping off an earlier query about Occupy Wall Street, pressed him on the decision not to prosecute any bankers in connection with the financial crisis. Matt Spetalnick of Reuters had good questions about China’s currency manipulation and America’s worsening relationship with Pakistan. And Aamer Madhani of USA Today asked about the White House response to the biggest story in the world today, the financial mess in Europe.
Still, the press conference continued an unfortunate trend: the apparent indifference of the White House press corps to the continuing fall-out from the housing crisis and the government’s response to it. Over the summer, I reviewed the transcript of every full-fledged press conference of the Obama presidency to that point. Among the things I discovered:
The word “foreclosure” was also used only once [in reporters’ questions]—on Feb. 9, 2009, when Jake Tapper listed it as one of several criteria that might be used to judge whether the economy had rebounded. The word “mortgage” has been used twice, and not since April 2009.
The word “housing” itself, meanwhile, seems not to have been used at all—and that’s despite the fact that the tail end of 2010, when coverage of foreclosure fraud peaked, is also when Obama held press conferences most frequently
As I acknowledged at the time, this isn’t surprising—press conferences tend to focus on the news of the day, and the housing crisis is more of a gradual, slow-burn sort of story at this point. Still, this is an important story that belongs on the press corps’s agenda, and there was some slight reason for hope that this morning’s press conference might be an exception. That’s because just two days ago, ProPublica’s Paul Kiel published a terrific article about how the government’s feckless and ineffective mortgage modification program has been accompanied by feckless and ineffective official oversight. (Felix Salmon has more praise for the story here.) Kiel’s story makes a good case that some government auditors didn’t even understand the mechanics of a program they were supposed to be supervising. And while this may never seem a sexy topic, the article was grounded in previously undisclosed documents, giving it a dash of the reportorial flash that gets journalists’ attention.
But no luck. Of the nine reporters who had a chance to question the president today, none so much as hinted in this direction.
It’d be wrong to make too big a deal about this—presidential press conferences are hardly the sine qua non of political journalism. Still, today’s event represents a missed opportunity to get this issue back in the news cycle, and to hold the president accountable for a failed policy. So here’s a reminder for the White House press corps that when ordinary people have an opportunity to put questions directly to Obama, the housing crisis (and education, another subject the pro reporters neglect) is one of the things they ask about—something to keep in mind for POTUS’s next presser.
No questions on Fast and Furious either ... I guess the press gave him a bye on that huh? Its OK, though, its only dead Mexicans.
#1 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 01:35 PM
Actually, there was a question that directly asked about Fast and Furious. Check the transcript. Informed commenting is really much more helpful to all of us.
http://blogs.suntimes.com/sweet/2011/10/obama_oct_6_2011_press_confere.html
#2 Posted by Brian O'Connor, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 01:57 PM
Well I'll be ... bravo Jake Tapper.
#3 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 02:33 PM
When Tapper moved to ABC, I rolled my eyes, mentally - he'd worked at Salon, and it looked as though the mainstream media was adding that site to its rather slender fishing pool (The Washington Monthly, The New Republic, etc., but never anyone with a 'conservative' media resume). But he has been the only White House reporter who throws brushback pitches at Obama and the Democrats. The exception which proves the rule?
#4 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 08:19 PM
I don't know where Greg gets this silly idea that anyone expects Obama to do anything about education or housing, aside from running his mouth once in a while.
Education and housing are simply not priorities. Most Americans want JOBS. Commies want welfare. But neither side is overly concerned with school or housing.
Furthermore, the public is over Obama. Obama loses to ANY GOP candidate by 6 points. The thrill is deader than a doornail. Nobody seriously expects him to do anything anymore - especially wave his magic want to educate anyone or house anyone. They just want him to get the hell out of the way and let somebody take his place who knows how to spur investment and hiring in the private sector.
#5 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 10:18 PM
Greg wrote: "the housing crisis is more of a gradual, slow-burn sort of story at this point"
padikiller wonders: What "crisis"? The only "crisis" is that Obama is driving housing prices into the ground - destroying the only wealth that most middle class Americans have... But a direct consequence of this devastation of home value is a huge glut of cheap houses.
So what "crisis" are we talking about here, exactly? WHO says there is any "crisis" (besides Greg)?
#6 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Fri 7 Oct 2011 at 10:38 PM
"What "crisis"? "
It's nice to see padi's denialism isn't limited to global warming and wall street fraud.
#7 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sat 8 Oct 2011 at 02:53 PM
No seriously, Thimbles...
What's the "crisis"?
It is the "foreclosure crisis" (as you claim in another thread)?
Or is it the standard commie "affordable housing" crisis that Greg whined about in July?
Cause they're mutually exclusive. The "foreclosure crisis" is a direct result of the negative equity Americans face in response to the decline in values..
#8 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Sat 8 Oct 2011 at 04:40 PM
The commie/liberals are something else.
We have a sitting President who has summarily executed an American citizen who was was never convicted of or even charged with a crime..
Summary executions of American citizens (overseas, no less) without trial and without any due process of law..
And you commies want to talk about housing and eduction.
Pitiful
#9 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 10 Oct 2011 at 03:32 PM
Bullsh*t. I have posted on the illegal conditions of Bradely Manning's detention and I have posted elsewhere on the topic of Obama assuming the power to execute American Citizens, and done it here in passing.
There are threads for that discussion. This is not one.
#10 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Tue 11 Oct 2011 at 12:05 AM
Now Thimbles is a self-appointed Special Thread Police Agent.
Sorry to get your panties bunched up, but pointing out the fact that Greg is more worried about the commie agenda items (housing and education) than the fact that our President is killing citizens without due process is indeed topical, Thimbo.
#11 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Tue 11 Oct 2011 at 05:33 AM