It is tempting to view everything Schultz does through the lens of football. In part this is because at heart, he is a natural athlete: a large-hearted exhibitionist who, having little interest in the vagaries of politics, operates on a field with clear allies and enemies, and thrives on the notion of a crowd rallying behind him. But part of it, too, is that Schultz often sounds like an ex-jock when he talks about himself and his career. “Aha, you bastards, I made it!” is how Schultz described his reaction to the growing success of his radio show. “It was that old jockstrap starting to come out again, you know? And I just had that fight and determination and belief that gritting the teeth and keeping going was winning for us.”
His satisfaction was soon replaced by that familiar restlessness—that desire to, as his high-school friend had put it, “be somebody.” Schultz’s ambitions naturally turned to television. After a day of fulminating at the radio station in Fargo, he says he would return to his lakeside home in rural Minnesota and redirect his ire at the cable-news shows. “I just would scream at the TV set: ‘Why can’t I get a chance to do that?’”
In 2007, Schultz bought a $150,000 satellite camera and had it installed in the Fargo radio station. Now the playing field between the heartland and the coasts was a bit more level, and Schultz began appearing as a talking head on CNN, MSNBC, and Fox. “I had to make Ed Schultz a bigger brand if I was gonna do this,” he says.
In the Democratic presidential primary in 2008, Schultz went early for Obama, a decision he attributes in part to having grown up in Virginia during the civil rights era. “I carried a lot of water for Obama,” he says of his broadcasts during that time. “I pounded for him hard. I went after the Clintons. I went after every Democratic challenger.”
He’s convinced his support did not go unnoticed. After Obama won, Schultz put his name on the list to attend the first presidential press conference. He arrived at the event and learned that he had been assigned a seat in the front row, right next to Helen Thomas. “That was the Obama people saying thanks,” he says. “I know it was. I know it was.”
Phil Griffin was watching that press conference, and was surprised to see Big Eddie, who had pitched him to get on the network in the past, front and center. Griffin had his assistant set up a meeting in Georgetown, which, as he had with the Senate Democrats, Schultz turned into an audition. “I came out of that conversation pumped up about what Ed was saying and about what he could bring to the network,” Griffin says. “I wanted a voice like that.”
The Ed Show debuted in April 2009. In early meetings about the show, Schultz says he told MSNBC management, “I want to tell a story about what America needs. And what America needs right now is a voice for the middle class.”
Throughout the first year of his show, Schultz brought his fire-breathing style to the debate over healthcare reform, hammering relentlessly for the public option and quickly establishing his progressive bona fides. Years later, his audience still remembers him for it. Every Schultz fan I talk to brings up healthcare—and Schultz’s mother, who died of Alzheimer’s, and his wife, whose battle with cancer Schultz discussed on the air. The personal connection people feel to the man is undeniable. As Schultz put it, in his industry “they’ve gotta like the talent.”

Ed has a work ethic like no other.
#1 Posted by Kay, CJR on Fri 1 Mar 2013 at 01:37 AM
What a sick-making puff piece. How tough CJR is on 'underdogs' (i.e., losers in the ratings wars), if they have the correct politics. I looked, but did not see, any reference to the 'spambot' revelations about 'The Ed Show' that have been recently uncovered.
#2 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 12:58 PM
Mark,
Thanks for taking the time to "look" for a reference to something Newsbusters wrote about three days after this piece was published. If you "read" we might be able to have a productive discussion.
#3 Posted by Michael Meyer, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 02:02 PM
No mention of Ed Schultz's first wife, Maureen Zimmerman? One can only speculate why.
Is it because Maureen Zimmerman filed numerous orders of protection against Ed Schultz?
I think we would all like to know if Ed Schultz is abusive to women.
#4 Posted by Dave, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 04:45 PM
Michael Meyer, fair enough. But CJR has been known to publish 'updates' on existing stories when it suits the political mission, such as ion Mariah Blake's energetic efforts, as non-partisan-sounding as those in defense of John Edwards not too long ago in CJR, on behalf of Sen. Menendez. Also, the 'spambot' story did not originate with Newsbusters, but with Paul Bibeau, a liberal blogger, the day after your piece ran. Does this mean that Newsbusters is more up-to-date in its information-gathering than CJR?
#5 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 05:14 PM
I don't think Ed really expects people to believe the poison he is spewing on that show it is completly off the wall. He is a big part of the problem with politics especially feeding this "who wants ice cream" crowd of loafers in today's society
#6 Posted by mark, CJR on Tue 5 Mar 2013 at 08:50 PM
If Maddow and Hayes are considered the MSNBC stars, go figure.
TV has strong pulls toward safety and political cliche.
Maddow is certainly not the political progressive that Schultz is, and Hayes is basically right of center, nothing progressive about him.
MSNBC, that runs fairly good talk shows, needs someone like Ed Schultz to balance all the pabulum, and the arm waving, finger thrusting, rat a tat tat gatling gun style of almost unlistenable vocal delivery featured by Maddow and Hayes! Schultz compared to them is amodel of gestural decorum!
Since they got going with the arm waving, fist showing, finger thrusting, table thumping--now a lot of the other talkies on the channel are doing it too.
What a silly bunch of grandstanders Griffin thinks are his stars.
TV talk show media needs to keep an honest broker like Ed Schultz.
#7 Posted by Jo Kirk, CJR on Thu 7 Mar 2013 at 03:51 PM
Until I read this CJR piece all I knew was...Shultz is a perfect fit for MSNBC between Chris and Rachel. It is good teleision. All three tell the story that fuits the world and gives HOPE!
#8 Posted by Fred E Walker, CJR on Thu 7 Mar 2013 at 03:54 PM
Ed Shultz is my favorite and Lawrence O'D. 2nd. I don't like the giberish of Chris, Rachel or Ezra as hosts. They remind me of someone that has to talk fast so they can go to the bathroom.
Take Ed off and I'll go back to watching CBS evenings.
#9 Posted by Sandy McGrew, CJR on Thu 14 Mar 2013 at 04:29 PM
Chris & Hayes really are not as passionate as ed is! They both race thru the written dialog with not much heartfelt enthusiasm. Don't get me wrong they are smart & talented but not the fighting passionate caring ed. I ll wait for the Rachel show. when ed switches I will follow his weekend time.I most likely will skip msnbc at the 8:00 hour.
#10 Posted by sbeaubien, CJR on Thu 14 Mar 2013 at 10:33 PM
I am so glad to find others who feel that Ed Schultz is the perfect balance to the decidedly cerebral approach of the other shows. I am pretty cerebral myself, so it is a great joy and relief to hear from people who speak from the heart.... I am so sorry that Ed is gone from 8PM since I don't watch MSNBC as much as I used to.
On another note, I am still stunned by the venom that some people spew in the comment sections... much of it quite ideological. I guess when you have reached all the conclusions there are, you just need to "find" justification or just make it up.
#11 Posted by Charlotte , CJR on Sat 13 Apr 2013 at 03:54 AM