Robert Hernandez We actually may be “post-race” by 2050, but we still will write mea culpas on things like homosexuality coverage. Immigration seems like something we’ll always debate, blaming actual “aliens” for taking our jobs. I think we’ll also write a mea culpa about science—global warming, questioning evolution and such.
Baratunde Thurston The equivalent of magazine covers will ask, “What Happened to All the White People?” and it will be an in-depth multipart report on how whites willingly and involuntarily gave up power over the previous 100 years. Parts of this piece will focus on backlash, resentment, and failure, and it will highlight mass incarceration and persistent segregation as examples of this. But the piece will close on a more hopeful tone, pointing to the efforts of groups like La Raza and NAACP to help counsel White America through this difficult transition. We will ultimately say that young people connected by technology and global culture helped salvage and reinvigorate the American Dream. The piece will get a Pulitzer. My granddaughter will be the author.
June Cross I had a convo with an older white man last night. He was amazed by the “five different colors” in Obama’s family. I thought he meant the shade of magenta, blue, gray—but no: He meant the colors within Obama’s family. “I never thought I would see such a thing in a presidential family,” he marveled. Not that George Washington and Thomas Jefferson didn’t have Technicolor families; but Caucasians still question. I am not as sanguine as the rest of you that all the problems of the world will be solved by 2050.
Baratunde Thurston National Intelligence Council does a report on the world in 2030, and some of the charts go out to 2050. We’re all going to be singing, “Brown & Yellow, Brown & Yellow, Brown & Yellow!”
Farai Chideya Part of the task is to reward reporters or reporting that can bridge cultures. [Vietnamese-American] journalist and fiction writer Andrew Lam does that well. What have you seen that does things well of late?
Raju Narisetti Washington Post’s The Root, despite lack of commercial success or scale, still continues to do a good job of covering major stories through the prism of race.
Raquel Cepeda From a Latino-American perspective, I’ve seen/read sprinkles of great reporting on race/ethnicity in The Christian Science Monitor. WSJ has published some slamming pieces. When CNN aired “Latino In America,” they published interesting online content. . . . I don’t know if there is one site that really investigates the Latino/Latina-American demo well, like, say, Root.com does.
Doug Mitchell I’m giving a talk to an all-white group of alt-newspaper people tomorrow. I want to ask them about the word diversity. I’m wondering if it’s time to redefine it or change it? And I would argue that 2050 is here.
Farai Chideya Here’s the thing: We can and will change terms like diversity, but the issue is not the terminology.
Doug Mitchell You’re right. [And] the NewU Entrepreneur Fellowship through UNITY Journalists and the Ford Foundation has me thinking on how to get more of journalists of color to become the employer, not just the employee.
Tristan Ahtone Ownership is a huge problem. I think some problems can be solved when we have a diverse newsroom, able to push management to say what is important, and why.
Farai Chideya Money, power, ownership, and leadership—all will factor into how the journalism of 2050 covers race, diversity, wealth, and class. Given the tremendous changes our field has gone through in the past 40 years, mid-21st-century media is bound to be very different from today. But we humans being who we are—curious, inquisitive, and sometimes fearful—there’s bound to be an ongoing debate about some of the same issues we’re puzzling through today.

No newsroom's coverage of the issues and concerns discussed here is good enough, but I'd put WNYC's up against anyone's with similar resources. People in New York and New Jersey who listened to us during Sandy - and people did, in enormous numbers, what with power out and the web and TV unavailable - heard stories about people of all colors and classes who were struggling, or helping one another, or organizing to demand government action.
Our staff covers topics like poverty and public housing on a regular basis, so that experience influenced our storm coverage - and continues to, because (not unlike in New Orleans post-Katrina) the reporting on a giant storm's aftermath, and the issues exposed, is a long-term commitment.
Maybe it's a public radio thing, but just about every one of our reporters seems to weigh issues of color and class in defining his or her beat coverage. A good example is "In Harm's Way," Kathleen Horan's reports on every child in New York City who's killed by gunfire. Talking the other day about why we're doing these stories, Kathleen and I agreed it's in part so that those in our audience who don't live amid poverty and violence are challenged to value an inner-city child's life on the same terms as their own children's.
I don't really think that mindset is so rare in the Mainstream Media that take such a beating in this roundtable. It helps to have a polyglot, diverse staff, of course - and as our newsroom grows (yes! It is!) we have to stay deeply committed to diversity. But isn't the most critical thing that we be curious and empathetic in our reporting and assigning and editing? We're all capable of that.
#1 Posted by Jim Schachter, CJR on Sat 2 Mar 2013 at 06:01 PM
Hey Jim:
It sounds as if you may have taken the article as an attack, which it wasn't. It's a brainstorm about the future with people who are all inventing the future, which is the kind of conversation I like to have. Public radio, for example, tracks well with income levels but less well across demographics less educated. That means there are racial and geographic schisms in listenership... and as any good reporter knows, the people who feel you inform them often can give new leads and new perspectives. Sometimes the manifestation of the diversity of a newsroom is cultural fluency and also some b.s. detection when it comes to self-appointed leaders of "minority" communities.
I'd love to hear more about what you read in the article that sparked your comment, as well as any thoughts on my words above.
Thanks for reading,
Farai
#2 Posted by Farai Chideya, CJR on Wed 6 Mar 2013 at 07:53 PM
The lede on this story is somewhat misleading and merits clarification.
The quote cited was followed by this sentence: "John Carroll, the editor of the Los Angeles Times, who edited this newspaper from 1979 to 1991, recently proposed a correction like this one during a speech on journalism ethics."
It became the set-up quote to a lengthy piece that examined the Lexington papers' coverage of the civil rights movement, or lack thereof. It was pulled out in larger type in the display and garnered much attention.
Tim Kelly
President & Publisher (retired)
Lexington Herald-Leader
#3 Posted by Timothy M. Kelly, CJR on Wed 3 Apr 2013 at 12:37 PM
Can't say enough good things about this intelligent, insightful discussion, which will hopefully spark many more in newsrooms (and exec suites) across the country. Kudos to CJR for making it cover story and then giving it so much space inside.
#4 Posted by Blue Heron, CJR on Mon 8 Apr 2013 at 02:57 PM
How much of a role do the politics and overall financial interests of the owners of the various national media outlets play in determining which news and other stories will receive coverage in the national media?
For example: If covering the news on a particular issue is likely to have an adverse impact on their overall financial holdings, will the owners of those media outlets forbid their media outlets to cover the news related to those stories in an effort to protect their financial interests?
#5 Posted by Ginny Webster, CJR on Sat 13 Apr 2013 at 02:28 PM