To be a Found Media journalist or pundit, one need not be elite, expert, or trained; one must simply produce punchy intellectual property that is in conversation with groups of other citizens. Found Media-ites don’t tend to go to editors for approval, but rather to their readers and to their blog community. In many cases, they disdain the old models, particularly newspapers, which they see as having calcified over the decades, and, according to generally youthful Found Media logic, in deep need of a re-think, using all of youth’s advantages: time and the ability to instantly summon a crowd. For Found Media’s young journalists and bloggers, the attitude toward our craft tends not to be one of mourning for the ashram gone. Rather, it is of not needing a guru at all.
This year, the Nieman Conference tried to accommodate all this newness. There were seminars on homepages, blogging, nonlinear storyboarding, and the journalist-as-entrepreneur. The speaker on blogging, Joshua Benton, a reporter from The Dallas Morning News, tried to vault across the chasm between the narrative nonfiction the conference attendees loved and the RSS feeds all around them. Benton argued, quite compellingly, that narrative journalists and bloggers were both “subversive forces in the American newsroom.” He didn’t quite get at the fact that the former, professionals, were once remunerated, and the latter usually aren’t.
Most of the conference’s attendees were business-card-carrying members of Lost Media. This meant that despite their ashramic euphoria, attendees, when they left the seminars, often fell into disconsolate conversations about the fate of journalism. A former San Francisco Chronicle Magazine staff member shook her head and asked me rhetorically, “What will happen to us? None of the people I knew when I started is still at the Chronicle.” One conference speaker championed the need for us to become better reporters—to develop further what she called “the art of listening” to subjects—in a time when bloggers merely recycle the small scraps of original reporting from Lost Media, creating a landscape of “derivative information.” Over Thai food after one day of Nieman seminars, a group of nonfiction authors fretted about where, whether offline or online, they could now publish graceful long-form stories about serious things—stories that sometimes change the world—and actually get paid decent wages. Such work takes money and time and, yes, training in order to get the painstaking reporting right. What will happen to such work in the future?
There are people and institutions working to make the reporting of the past possible to locate within Found Media. Some of these efforts pick off a piece of what newspapers used to do but are beginning to drop. For example, some time early next year, Charles Sennott, a well-regarded former foreign correspondent for The Boston Globe (which no longer has a foreign staff), and Phil Balboni, founder of New England Cable News, are launching Global News Enterprises, a Web site dedicated to foreign news, using stringers. That effort is backed by Hearst and Comcast, but others are nonprofit models. The most famous of those so far is ProPublica, an independent newsroom funded by philanthropy that aspires to “produce investigative journalism in the public interest.” Its president and editor in chief is Paul Steiger, the former managing editor of The Wall Street Journal.
As Steiger sees it, the young journalists or commentators or information organizers of Found Media have helped create “an enormously robust opinion sphere” but have left “a growing gap between that and the actual accumulation of information, the sort of information you get and write about after you conceptualize and meditate.” As a corrective, ProPublica aims to synthesize new platforms and older methods with “enough funding to do digging,” as Steiger puts it. Hopefully, the outlet and others like it will inspire Lost Media management types to find more well-lit paths out of the chaos all around them, as they transition into the digital age.

Heavens, not ANOTHER article about how "bloggers" are all young, and mostly not paid, and recycling others' hard work. Please look a little bit further for your sourcing next time you tackle this topic. We are not so young (a couple in the near-50/just-past-50 range), paid (our ad sales continue to grow), and writing/reporting ALL original material, with the occasional link only provided if it's something so incredible it's news all its own, at our community-level news website. I'm the editor and I worked in "lost media" for 25-plus years. Made my own pathway out (although we didn't start our site with that intention - it evolved because there was an aching community need for up-to-the-minute news, information, and discussion). You touch on this briefly but I strongly urge anyone else who fears their old-media days are numbered (mine probably weren't but I just didn't want to stay in that festering situation any more) to look at the options with promise and hope, not dread and fear. So many community-news sites are not only helping citizens become more informed, educated, and involved, but also are creating more of an appetite for news and information that can be provided by other sources too, including those that previously were here but hadn't quite evolved. P.S. Don't bother getting into "found media" if you're afraid of hard work. It's 24/7. And it's by far the most fulfilling thing I've ever done, professionally.
Posted by West Seattle Blog
on Wed 21 May 2008 at 02:31 PM
Is the esteem of the industry so low that we get to read several thousand words on how journalism's future will be guided by unpaid, unedited and totally self-directed keyboard addicts?
The entire argument on Lost Media and Found Media may sound tasty today, but there's less structure to it than a Wheat Thin. The success of the Found Media is dependent on aggregators finding a way to make a profit -- something that doesn't seem to be in the cards yet. Whatever margin that's available now is due mainly to the low- and no-cost supply of content, and those brazen, pioneering young things of the Found Media are going to have to find money for rent, kids and health insurance someday soon.
And, despite the best of intentions, things done for the glory of being on the cutting edge tend to wane, as we've seen one (and arguably two or three) digital revolutions turn into, well, not much. We are running fast into an age where that Lost Media is losing ground, although it's easier to credit a conjured-up Found Media movement than realise the public isn't buying your product because they don't feel they need it. And it's not all being captured by what's being presented as the Next Best Thing in journalism; instead of asking "how many hours do you spend on the Internet" for a survey question, ask "How many blogs do you read every day? Please tell us which ones are your favorites." Think you'll really get more than three percent of the audience actually able to tick off the Huntington Post or Daily Kos (especially without being prompted)?
The business is changing, and we have to adapt to what the consumer wants. Do you really think that's going to be a product dominated by, to be honest, amateurs with no real goal beyond today?
Posted by psemerson
on Wed 21 May 2008 at 05:38 PM
Stop whining. Start innovating.
Every reporter, editor and news exec should repeat that like a mantra every morning and every evening. Why alleged newspaper leaders think they can do better by making their product increasingly irrelevant is beyond imagining.
Cutting staff and shrinking newsholes for short-term financial gain is no strategy. Less does not equal more. And old does not equal new.
Newspaper execs talk like the record company executives who still think they are selling CDs, not music. Market news, not paper. Give people a reason to buy the paper/visit the website/watch the video/listen to the audio/interact online.
I get the fear and uncertainty. I scored my first professional newspaper byline in 1993. I have bled ink.
But the world is changing. Deal with it.
Posted by Sean Carr
on Thu 22 May 2008 at 12:16 PM
I once wa-as lost but now am found, was blind bu-ut now I see...
But what I see is media folks of all kinds clamoring for a more nuanced, less polarized discussion. More at mediarepublic.org.
Posted by Persephone
on Fri 23 May 2008 at 01:27 PM
Let's face the facts. I'm not being cynic but its true. We all have to deal with the fact that web-addicts ARE in fact taking over what you may call the "Lost Media". It's time to accept that journalism has not entirely been shaped by it's writers, its also been shaped by its readers. If the audience wants entertainment and entertainment is web based than writers must mold to fit that requirement. Unfortunately, this is the way it must be done. One cannot spend their days moping about change, its a "if you can't beat them, join them" situation. The "found media" is actually not that bad. Bloggers can provide some writers with some type certainty that articles are being read. Whether they like what is written or not, is another story, but hey it comes with the job. The world is changing you either mold with it or you'll find yourself in an uphill battle.
In the end, accept it..you really can't ignore the digital elephant in the room.
Posted by Y.T.S. on Mon 9 Mar 2009 at 02:26 PM