I didn’t know it, but that was also the start of a fifteen-year body of work on Middle Eastern religious extremism and terrorism. I had experimented with the adrenaline addiction that is foreign reporting during the gulf war, but after chasing suspects all over the Middle East, I was completely hooked. The five-part series I had hoped for was cut considerably, however; New York shrugged off the bombing as the work of a bunch of loser taxi drivers. It was hard to see at the time that this was nascent Al Qaeda.
Soon after that series, I was hired by The Boston Globe. Finally, I was at a paper with a foreign desk and foreign postings, and the editor, Matt Storin, knew I had my eye on one of them. In 1997, he gave me the greatest reporting assignment I ever had: Middle East bureau chief. I spent most of the next decade in Jerusalem and London, and covered the Palestinian intifada, the war in Kosovo, conflicts in Algeria and Lebanon. I traveled throughout the Middle East. When September 11 hit, I was among the first reporters on the ground in Afghanistan. All that police reporting that began with the first World Trade Center bombing gave me the grounding to do worthwhile work. I also went to Iraq and, eventually, “The Long War” became what I covered for a living. I had three sons (soon would have four), yet the work seemed worth the considerable risk. I felt like I had something to add, like I was doing work that mattered. But then the paper put me up for a Nieman Fellowship at Harvard University and used it as leverage to extricate me from the London bureau.
By the time I got back to the Globe in the late summer of 2006, the landscape for American newspapers had dramatically shifted. Colleagues had complained about management and where the paper was headed, but I had dismissed most of their bleak assessments as whining, something reporters are known to do. But then the Globe announced the closure of all of its foreign bureaus. The mission shrank. The ambition to cover the nation and the world was put aside. It was an understandable decision when you looked at the books, but it broke my heart.
Spurred by a friend and colleague, Gary Knight, the cofounder of the photo agency vii, I began to think about starting my own foreign-news agency. While Gary and I were traveling in Afghanistan for a piece about the fifth anniversary of September 11, I told him I feared it would probably be my last foreign assignment for the Globe. He encouraged me to go out and do my own thing, pull together the many friends and colleagues we shared and create our own boutique foreign-news agency. It was a push.
And it got me going. I began quietly developing a proposal for a nonprofit model for an international news agency. Pretty soon I was closing in on several hundred thousand dollars from funders. Yet as I was working up this plan in my basement office, I could often hear my four boys roughhousing upstairs, pounding the floorboards above my head. It was a constant reminder that I was out of my mind to take such a financial risk and leave the paper. Buyouts were pending and that would help, but how would I provide for a big family with a startup nonprofit? I had serious doubts; staying at the Globe meant a steady paycheck. I resolved to stay put, but felt restless.

Despite the deep admiration I have for Charles Sennott, I worry about the motivations for beliefs like this: Global Post's business plan "was written with a philosophy that I had come to respect: quality journalism has value and it needs to be paid for." Why must that be philosophy? As a practical matter, I'm certainly fine with a publisher charging for content if it can. But I see no defensible grounds for a philosophy (dogma?) that the way to monetize journalism is by selling content. There are so many other options, as these guys well know.
#1 Posted by Josh Young, CJR on Tue 3 Mar 2009 at 02:22 PM
GlobalPost is a BS news outlet. Don't let Mark full you here. Pure BS. Why? They lump Taiwan in as part of China on their intl news page, calling Taiwan part of some imaginary country or place called "China and its neighbors", which lumps Taiwan in the communist pile, but does not put Japan or South Korea there, although those countries are also neighbors to China. So why only Taiwan? because the GlobalPost has no cojones to stand up for freeedon and challenge communist China. i have written 25 letters to Mark and go no reply on this. This GlobalPost thing is pure BS. Mark, face the facts, man.
#2 Posted by Danny Bloom, CJR on Thu 5 Mar 2009 at 08:33 PM
Kindle as a verb has now been accepted officiallt Wikipedia and Urbandictionary, can you pass this info on to Michael and Karen, thanks
DANNY BLOOM in Taiwan, who did the legwork on this.!
Some Kindle users are now using the word "kindle" as a verb as in "Are you kindling?" or "I am kindling now and will call you back in one hour" or "I love to kindle on my Kindle now." The editors at UrbanDictionary have accepted the word as a verb now, since it is in common usage on the blogosphere. The defintion reads: "To read a book or a newspaper on a Kindle e-reading device."
In fact, the name "Kindle" was conceived by San Francisco designer Michael Cronan, and according to his wife and partner, Karen Hibma, "we wanted it to be memorable, and meaningful in many ways of expression, from 'I love curling up with my Kindle to read a new book' to 'When I'm stuck in the airport or on line, I can Kindle my newspaper, favorite blogs or half a dozen books I'm reading'", so the use of "kindle" as both a noun and a verb was already set in motion from the very beginning. WIth the uppercase the word or lowercase it depends on how it is used, of course. As a proper noun, it should be uppercased. As a verb, it should be lowercased, but it may be uppercased as well.
#3 Posted by danny, CJR on Thu 5 Mar 2009 at 09:49 PM
Global Post offered to publish a story I proposed at what amounted to 26 cents per word. The terms: they would own exclusive rights to the writing worldwide into eternity as well as the rights to all material related to the work. This is something Mr. Sennott does not address as he describes the struggle to get GlobalPost off the ground. With non-negotiable terms like this for freelancers, I fail to see how quality journalists will agree to give away their work and all rights to it into perpetuity. It is Global Post's right to make money from freelance writing to sustain themselves, but in the end, the brands consistent with quality content will survive. This requires negotiating with freelancers to come to terms that are fair and equitable to both sides, not just one. The idea that Global Post is somehow different from the corporate media, based on the terms that were offered to me, is simply inaccurate.
#4 Posted by Kristen Gillespie, CJR on Thu 12 Mar 2009 at 02:34 AM
As a former Brazilian correspondent in Washington, DC, and now a journalism and new media reporting lecturer at the University of Miami School of Communication, I find this initiative one of the best opportunities for all journalists, young and old. Check my full comments @http://newmediareporting.com
#5 Posted by Chris Delboni, CJR on Wed 18 Mar 2009 at 03:46 PM
Well, good luck. But if your site is anything like your article, nearly three pages about yourself and virtually nothing about your editorial product or financial progress, it must be very thin soup. Enquiring minds want to know: are you making it or not? Are papers and others paying for your product or not? How can you advise those of us with jobs to "break out" if you don't give us the facts? Just the facts.
#6 Posted by Stuart, CJR on Fri 24 Apr 2009 at 11:41 PM