So nine months later, staring out at the snow on that January night we launched GlobalPost, I was thinking about that last day at the Globe, and struck by the contrast I felt. The newspaper world was tactile. The trucks idle in the cold, pre-dawn morning like horses. The floor in the pressroom is slippery with ink. I had held a union card that guaranteed me “employment for life,” an agreement the unions had reached in the flush days of the early 1990s. And the sound of a big newsroom chasing a breaking story was still great, even if more and more cubicles were empty. Here I was launching an entire news organization in the dead of night with only the quiet clatter of a keyboard. It just didn’t seem the same somehow.
Yet creating a news organization in the ferment of the Internet has been thrilling and nerve wracking all the same. We have raised approximately $8.5 million of the $10 million of capital that we require, which gives us more than enough for a solid footing. We always knew it would be difficult to make this work and the global economic collapse has, of course, made it even harder. We have kept our revenue projections in place, but recognize that we will have to work harder to achieve them. No one ever said it would be easy.
And editorially, I see the global economic collapse as a great and important story for us. It’s the kind of event that seems to cry out for a news organization like ours, one with a breadth of global coverage. We have a total of sixty-five correspondents in forty-five countries filing dispatches. Ten of these cover the kind of beat, or “latitude” as we dubbed it, that cuts across national boundaries and connects us all.
Our site sets out to have a distinctly American voice. Not a tone that is nationalistic or jingoistic, but a writing style with a good ear for American storytelling and a respect for the standards of American journalism. We also want to provide both current and historical context—for instance, by recognizing that Americans do not have enough grounding in history to understand international stories. So we built interactive timelines for many of the country pages. We began our launch with a fifty-part series from many corners of the world titled “For Which It Stands,” focused around a single question that we wanted to pose on the eve of the new presidency: What does the idea of America mean to the world?
GlobalPost has assembled a stellar team that includes veterans such as H. D. S. Greenway and William Dowell, both with distinguished careers that stretch across a half century, from Vietnam to Iraq. We have decorated, mid-career correspondents such as Joshua Hammer in Berlin, Matt McAllester in London, Matt Benyon Rees in Jerusalem, Edward Gargan in Beijing, Caryle Murphy in Saudi Arabia, and Jane Arraf in Baghdad. And we also have tremendous young talent, such as Mildred Cherfils in Paris, Theodore May in
Cairo, and Patrick Winn in Thailand. All are working with us as a piece of freelance portfolio. They are paid a steady retainer of $1,000 per month for four dispatches, and they get ten thousand shares of the company. Overall, employees make up nearly half of the non-investor common stock in the company.
On the business side, Phil has kept us nimble and expanded our opportunities for revenue to include two new streams. First, we have developed a syndication model for newspapers, which are cutting back on or abandoning foreign coverage. We announced during the week of our launch that we had signed on the New York Daily News, a huge opportunity for our company and a great full-circle moment for me personally. Second, we created a membership model for premium content, called Passport.

Despite the deep admiration I have for Charles Sennott, I worry about the motivations for beliefs like this: Global Post's business plan "was written with a philosophy that I had come to respect: quality journalism has value and it needs to be paid for." Why must that be philosophy? As a practical matter, I'm certainly fine with a publisher charging for content if it can. But I see no defensible grounds for a philosophy (dogma?) that the way to monetize journalism is by selling content. There are so many other options, as these guys well know.
#1 Posted by Josh Young, CJR on Tue 3 Mar 2009 at 02:22 PM
GlobalPost is a BS news outlet. Don't let Mark full you here. Pure BS. Why? They lump Taiwan in as part of China on their intl news page, calling Taiwan part of some imaginary country or place called "China and its neighbors", which lumps Taiwan in the communist pile, but does not put Japan or South Korea there, although those countries are also neighbors to China. So why only Taiwan? because the GlobalPost has no cojones to stand up for freeedon and challenge communist China. i have written 25 letters to Mark and go no reply on this. This GlobalPost thing is pure BS. Mark, face the facts, man.
#2 Posted by Danny Bloom, CJR on Thu 5 Mar 2009 at 08:33 PM
Kindle as a verb has now been accepted officiallt Wikipedia and Urbandictionary, can you pass this info on to Michael and Karen, thanks
DANNY BLOOM in Taiwan, who did the legwork on this.!
Some Kindle users are now using the word "kindle" as a verb as in "Are you kindling?" or "I am kindling now and will call you back in one hour" or "I love to kindle on my Kindle now." The editors at UrbanDictionary have accepted the word as a verb now, since it is in common usage on the blogosphere. The defintion reads: "To read a book or a newspaper on a Kindle e-reading device."
In fact, the name "Kindle" was conceived by San Francisco designer Michael Cronan, and according to his wife and partner, Karen Hibma, "we wanted it to be memorable, and meaningful in many ways of expression, from 'I love curling up with my Kindle to read a new book' to 'When I'm stuck in the airport or on line, I can Kindle my newspaper, favorite blogs or half a dozen books I'm reading'", so the use of "kindle" as both a noun and a verb was already set in motion from the very beginning. WIth the uppercase the word or lowercase it depends on how it is used, of course. As a proper noun, it should be uppercased. As a verb, it should be lowercased, but it may be uppercased as well.
#3 Posted by danny, CJR on Thu 5 Mar 2009 at 09:49 PM
Global Post offered to publish a story I proposed at what amounted to 26 cents per word. The terms: they would own exclusive rights to the writing worldwide into eternity as well as the rights to all material related to the work. This is something Mr. Sennott does not address as he describes the struggle to get GlobalPost off the ground. With non-negotiable terms like this for freelancers, I fail to see how quality journalists will agree to give away their work and all rights to it into perpetuity. It is Global Post's right to make money from freelance writing to sustain themselves, but in the end, the brands consistent with quality content will survive. This requires negotiating with freelancers to come to terms that are fair and equitable to both sides, not just one. The idea that Global Post is somehow different from the corporate media, based on the terms that were offered to me, is simply inaccurate.
#4 Posted by Kristen Gillespie, CJR on Thu 12 Mar 2009 at 02:34 AM
As a former Brazilian correspondent in Washington, DC, and now a journalism and new media reporting lecturer at the University of Miami School of Communication, I find this initiative one of the best opportunities for all journalists, young and old. Check my full comments @http://newmediareporting.com
#5 Posted by Chris Delboni, CJR on Wed 18 Mar 2009 at 03:46 PM
Well, good luck. But if your site is anything like your article, nearly three pages about yourself and virtually nothing about your editorial product or financial progress, it must be very thin soup. Enquiring minds want to know: are you making it or not? Are papers and others paying for your product or not? How can you advise those of us with jobs to "break out" if you don't give us the facts? Just the facts.
#6 Posted by Stuart, CJR on Fri 24 Apr 2009 at 11:41 PM