When asked directly about whether Comcast would oppose extending program access rules to online providers, Fitzmaurice pointed to a footnote in a Comcast filing with the FCC that said that such a move “could stifle investment and innovation and would raise extremely complex issues involving a wide range of stakeholders.”
The short answer: over this deal’s dead body.
Roberts has warned analysts that if regulators attach conditions to their approval of the deal that he considers “material,” he will walk away. Unlike many merger deals, this one requires no “breakup fee,” so Roberts won’t pay a penalty if he decides to break off the courtship because he doesn’t like the way Washington winds are blowing.
Although the transaction has been scrutinized in numerous congressional hearings—four on Capitol Hill, one each in California and Chicago, plus a FCC public forum, also in Chicago—experts say few in Washington have the stomach for the kind of fight the satellite guys had over the program access rules.
Comcast, which counts seventy-eight former government employees as lobbyists, has spent heavily to convince members of Congress to support the deal. In the second quarter of 2010, the company spent $3.82 million on lobbying—the most it has spent in single quarter. Comcast has convinced a large number of lawmakers to support the deal. Bloomberg News reported that ninety-one House members and three Senators who received Comcast campaign contributions have written letters to the FCC supporting the merger.
Wisconsin Senator Herb Kohl, the Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee’s subcommittee on antitrust, has been a persistent pain in Comcast’s neck regarding the merger. He has suggested rules akin to those that allowed the satellite industry to flourish be attached to this deal’s approval.
Among Comcast’s lobbying hires? Kohl’s former long-time chief of staff, Paul Bock of Capitol Hill Strategies. Bock registered to lobby on behalf of the merger on September 1, 2009.
Despite Comcast’s considerable political and financial might, the drift toward online television viewing is strong. Once upon a time, our grandparents couldn’t see the sense in paying for cable, said Crawford. Now a younger generation has started an online revolution that threatens to upset the stability of the entire television industry.
“They can’t avoid it forever,” she said of Comcast. “And they know that. But they can stave it off.”

Comcast works for itself not anyone else--esp. not the customer. When I had Comcast as my tv server, it cut me off by making my tv screens green with a banner at the bottom telling with station I was one and the program that was supposed to be there but wasn't. When I called to have "it fixed", the operator told me it had to be my tv. Sure!!!--if that were so then why do I have the banner or the notice??? Later operator told me that if I added $1.39 per month to my bill then if something were to be fixed I wouldn't have to pay. Totalling it up that makes the equivalent of a the cost of a house call per year. They didn't like the fact that I didn't pay per view for sports or movies or extras like HBO.
Plan on problems with Comcast and all the others. AT&T has set their machinery to work ONLY with HD, LED and flat screen tvs. Not those things we used to call televisions. For them those are too ancient and if AT&T work well enough with the screen makers, maybe the tv watchers will pay $900 to $2000- or more for the newer ones. I won't. I won't spend that much. TV is not that important and I can use the DVDs and tapes without their cable hookups. Hasn't the news been telling everyone to hold off on extra purchases since the job situation is still poor and the only ones making a lot of money are the wealthy??? That's not me. So I'll just wait.
#1 Posted by Patricia Wilson, CJR on Tue 4 Jan 2011 at 04:24 PM
FTC hits Comcast CEO Brian Roberts with $500,000 fine. So what he makes over 30 million per year. Brian needs to reread the Comcast code of conduct where he tells employees he will not tolerate dishonesty from us. Why is he on Obama's jobs council? He should be fired. Do as I say, not as I do. Obama's slogan about "change you can believe in" should really be "the more things change the more they stay the same".
It's worse being an employee. At the Lynnwood, WA call center a fat sup named Kim Edwards sent an email requesting off the clock work. We are winning a class action lawsuit against them. Our lawyers are experienced and successful at winning this kind of case and we have the evidence. Comcast thinks that hiring a Perkins Coie lawyer will intimidate us. It just proves that they know they are going down and have a lot of money to waste.
#2 Posted by angry customer, CJR on Mon 2 Jan 2012 at 10:19 PM