Spencer Ackerman, who reports on national security issues for The Washington Independent and blogs about the same—and does both at a consistently high level of quality, which is not a simple task—last year posted an item on his blog, Attackerman, explaining how to deconstruct a typical piece by Seymour Hersh in The New Yorker. He said Hersh was ill-served by the conventional journalistic habit of shaping reporting into stories that needed to signify their importance. Lots of Hersh’s reporting, Ackerman argued, would be better understood as pure reporting and read simply because it was what Hersh had learned, whatever it portended. Shaping it into traditional journalism structures warped it.
One day, journalistic convention will decide that placing reporters like Hersh within the box of a lede (the intentional misspelling of “lead” is yet another journalistic convention that makes little sense) for a piece that needs no lede is a silly idea. Then, my friends, we will finally have the free play of notebook material. But until then, we have to read Hersh with a bit of a knowing eye. You can hate all you like, but god’s son is across the belly and he’ll prove you lost already. [Parenthesis mine, italics and capitalization his.]
I have no idea what that last sentence about God’s son and the belly means, but it’s a blog post so I don’t have to understand it and Ackerman doesn’t have to care that I don’t. This is part of the nature of blogging. The writer can assume I know exactly what he means, or not care that I don’t. Somebody else will get it. This kind of writing is directed at a very particular, almost personal, audience. It’s like writing in dialect and as far from a mass medium as you can get. While it happens to be available via the Internet to millions of people, it is certainly not aimed at them.
What Ackerman is advocating is that Hersh be liberated from the formal conventions of journalism, and the constraints that accompany them. Then he can simply say, “Here, look what I found.” Ackerman is asking, implicitly, that Hersh be regarded as a blogger. I think he’s right. I think blogging would suit Hersh. I also think blogging is saving journalism.
I worked at newspapers for thirty years and loved every day of it. Wait. It’s more complicated than that. Much more. In fact, to say I loved newspapering wholeheartedly is a bald-faced lie. I hated at least half of those three decades worth of days and swore at the end of many that it would be the last. I carried out these vows to quit several times, never for very promising prospects. I left to write speeches, to write fiction, to pound nails—none of which was I as good at as pounding a beat. So what was I fighting for or against? Sometimes, those who knew me would suggest that it was nothing more than myself. Sometimes, though, I actually had a point.
I hated the conventions that bound daily journalism, the stilted, odd language in which it was written as well as the contrived structures into which that odd language was shaped. The common newspaper style is so heavily codified you need a Berlitz course to interpret it. More than formal, the style is abstract and artificial. I once (on the very first day at a new job) got into a frighteningly intense argument with a city editor who had objected to my use of the word “slumbered” to describe the behavior of two political candidates during a debate. They didn’t really sleep through it, did they? he asked. Of course not, I said. I meant it figuratively, not literally. We don’t use figurative language here, he told me. Then he changed the word to “lumbered.”
That was one benighted guy, but the problem was nearly universal. Until recently, you couldn’t escape it. Now you can. The advent of the Web and the proliferation of smart, aggressive bloggers around the globe have torn journalism loose from its hinges. The hounds have been unleashed.

The "God's son..." line refers to a rap song by Nas called "Ether". It's an infamous song in the rap world, wherein Nas excoriates Jay-Z as part of a long-running feud between them during the nineties.
My guess is Attackerman was emphasising how right he is about all this.
#1 Posted by Sven Levy, CJR on Thu 21 Jan 2010 at 08:59 AM
It's a reference to lyrics in the song Ether by NAS,
http://www.lyricsmode.com/lyrics/n/nas/ether.html
google exists.
#2 Posted by cgb, CJR on Thu 21 Jan 2010 at 09:10 AM
I read the first page of this article and stopped.
There are actually three pages, but I will never know the other two.
Pages are a throwback to newspapers, and in an article online about "unleashing", why is there any usage of "pages? They are a pet peeve of mine that online media is adopting from hiring newspaper fodder people to write.
Worse is to read all of page one, and come to a neat signal "View as a Single Page"......this printed at the base of page 1, after you have gone that far.
For those foolish enough to click that link-----a most desirable option, and it should be at the TOP of page 1, not the bottom-----the link takes you all the way back to the beginning of what you have already read. You get to scroll and find your place anew.
I just scroll to a new site.
SKIP all pages; the net does not need them.
This is a shocking surprise to newspaper people. Column inches do not exist online; quality writing will keep folks reading and scrolling for more.
If you are working for a newspaper relic guy, and he insists on pages, give the option of viewing as a single page and give it at the top of page one.
Normal people will click that 100% of the time.
#3 Posted by Keystone, CJR on Thu 21 Jan 2010 at 09:50 AM
Keystone: I hate pages online too, but they were no invention of the "newspaper fodder" you so obviously loathe. They are a crass effort to generate more page views, which is a function of page designers and webmasters and ad salespeople.
As you didn't pay to read this article, your multiple whines carry little weight.
#4 Posted by Scott, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 12:00 PM
By the way, tell Ackerman that the "lede" spelling is antique, but not, or not originally, nonsensical. It comes from the days when papers were not only paper, but typeset; it was a way to distinguish a reference to the opening formulaic sentence of a story -- content -- from an instruction to the typesetters. "Lead" and "leading" refer (and still do in some layout software) to the space between lines of type. Likewise the archaic, and even more cryptic, #30 to denote the end of a story. Meant, "insert 30 points of lead" (to separate this from the next story).
#5 Posted by Lauren Walker, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 12:12 PM
Terry,
Nice article. You put your finger on a lot of issues that have pretty much gone unremarked in the rush to the Web.
One other thing that newspapers have provided over the last few decades is a benign institution that employs smart, interesting people (like you, like me, like a lot of newsroom addicts), gives them a salary and a place to sit and maybe an expense account and then encourages them to go play and have fun -- creatively.
Newspapers are like a university in that way, but without courses to teach.
Sad to see them going away,
Best to Millie,
Bob
#6 Posted by Bob Keefer, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 12:13 PM
In my experience, pagination of web stories was initially a usability requirement/preference from the very early Web days, when bandwidth was so constrained that long pages would load slowly and readers were also perceived as unlikely/unwilling to scroll down and read more than a single screen load at a time. This predated the application of ads to stories and the monitoring of and remuneration for page views. But as those capabilities and measurements were developed, and increased bandwidth and user familiarity eroded the original rationale for pagination, it does seem that publisher now do it as a default in an attempt to inflate their page-view stats.
Also, thanks, Lauren, for telling us the origin of #30. I did not know that!
#7 Posted by Mike, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 01:18 PM
Sorry, I didn't like the Cliff Lee/Matrix lede.
#8 Posted by John, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 01:44 PM
This is another annoying article. I too have been a newspaper journalist for longer than I care to count. And I'm one of the lucky ones who says there hasn't been a day that I haven't praised the heavens for my job. I've worked at some of the best papers in the nation when they were still at their best. I'm now carrying the flag for independent journalism at one of the few robust news bureaus left in Washington -- McClatchy's. And the simple reason people are leaving newspapers behind is that for the most part journalists have lost their independence. The New York Times promoted a bogus war in Iraq. The Wash Post and the Times collect "scoops" from government power brokers without the slightest skepticism or challenge about the so-called "facts" they are peddling. Local papers are full are articles that either are already on the tv or radio or are simply boring and not particularly relevant to anyone. Sadly, the effort to chase readers and to curb circulation declines have all-but-eliminated unique journalism from the pages of the nation's papers. Playing it safe won't offend anyone but curious, smart citizens, The reading public knows that. If you want proof, check the comments on really good investigative stories and you'll get a snout full of praise for the story and many laments for its rarity.
You want to rescue newspapers? Bring back aggressive, fair, independent journalism. Do that and readers will flock to your paper or website.
Don't and the web fanatics, who have a spiritual or financial interest in beating up newspapers, will win.
j
#9 Posted by James Asher, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 03:25 PM
Snarky, and spot-on, as usual.
#10 Posted by Jacqui Banaszynski, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 05:04 PM
Alternate theory on the meaning of -30-:
That was the telegram code that meant "end of message," and many stories were sent in the old days by wire.
-30-
#11 Posted by Bob Keefer, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 05:23 PM
Refresh your Ackerman link; it's busted.
Good article, though, from another former newspaperman who would never have believed how quickly he's lost the habit of ink-stained fingers.
#12 Posted by DDive, CJR on Fri 22 Jan 2010 at 05:57 PM
James--
All you say about the value of good reporting is true.
But has it never occurred to you that "the web fanatics" might also care about good journalism? And might have interesting ideas about how to go about it using a new medium?
I feel every day that there's an incredible new world dawning for journalism. A reinvention, and you can help. But first you have to be able to see what is good about the web, not just what is bad.
- Jonathan
#13 Posted by Jonathan Stray, CJR on Sat 23 Jan 2010 at 10:21 AM
Jonathan: I'm actually excited about the web and how it speeds quality work worldwide without the need to clear cut forests. And I'm an strong advocate within McClatchy for broadening our efforts on the Web. What I find offensive about the web fanatics is the way they steal our work and pretend it's their own. My favorite culprit is TPM muckraker, who lifted McClatchy's original journalism on the U.S. attorneys' scandal and now takes credit for the resignation of the AG. Josh Marshall should be ashamed, but he's too much of a self-promoter to see how he's damaging legitimate journalism by convincing people that we're irrelevant. For me, though, the web is the future and the salvation if we fill it with independent real journalism.
#14 Posted by james asher, CJR on Sat 23 Jan 2010 at 01:35 PM
Keystone: I read the first paragraph of your post to this article and stopped.
There are actually five paragraphs, but I will never know the other four...Go back to Twitter.
#15 Posted by turnpike, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 11:02 AM
This is the most stilted, long-winded piece I've read in some time. But it does make some salient points.
#16 Posted by Dusty Nathan, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 12:10 PM
Yep. Nailed it.
Same thing happened on biz side. Monopoly on local ads that eroded slowly at first to shoppers, broadcast television, cable television,and alt-weeklies.
ROP moved to preprints. (Less news hole)
The die was cast when web entered the picture.
#17 Posted by Newspaper Biz Guy, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 12:47 PM
Nice try: Another newspaper journalist clueless about his own industry! And your supposedly clever use of "slumbering" was, let's face it, a pointless indulgence that a good editor caught in time. I love the web, too, but the simple fact is that newspapers are run by ex-journalists with little or no connection to their audience or the business of keeping them engaged.
#18 Posted by Michael C., CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 01:06 PM
That newspapers are contributing to their deaths is hardly a secret, but it isn't style of writing inflicting the wounds. In a busy world, simplistic style allows readers to get the information quickly and get on with their lives.
Newspapers are hurting because of their own inability to manage properly. I've never heard of a sportswriter who couldn't coach a team better than the real coach and every editor or publisher thinks he or she can run a nation better than a president, a state better than a governor or a city better than a mayor,
When I first started at The Denver Post when I was still young and adorable, my first week there overlapped the last week of a copy editor named Adams. That was right after Labor Day. Just after the first of the new year, the managing editor came the 15 or 20 feet from his desk to asked us, "Have any of you guys ever heard of a guy named Adams who claims he used to work here?"
Not knowing who worked for him, not knowing anyone's qualifications, abilities, desires, accomplishments had most people misused and the newsroom in disarray with morale at rock bottom.
After he was promoted to executive editor, this same man told the news desk not to use Washington Post or New York Times stories on Watergate because "they lead us down a road we don't want to take," Reporters left the paper complaining that too many of their stories were killed; stories that might embarrass Denver's aristocracy. Management then imported outsiders to fill every decent job opening, ignoring loyal longtime employees whose talents and qualifications made them better than the imports. Management wouldn’t even interview veterans of the newspaper who applied for the openings.
After a few years as an intelligence analyst and study of constitutional law at Georgetown University Graduate School of Government, I was used to edit stories of sports writers and entertainment, then to write captions for photogs, never once used in the areas of my expertise or experience all the while know-little hacks were writing columns and editorials that only demonstrated ignorance of, or disdain for, America's constitutional philosophy.
If it weren't for the importance of news and information, newspapers will hardly be missed by me.
#19 Posted by Ex-journalist, CJR on Mon 25 Jan 2010 at 04:41 PM
I love everything Terry McDermott write and absolutely loved 'Perfect Soldiers'. Some of us may not have the gift of writing, but we can always enjoy great insight, eloquently expressed.
#20 Posted by Lois Cowell, CJR on Fri 5 Feb 2010 at 05:17 AM
That is understandable that money makes people free. But what to do if one does not have cash? The only one way is to get the credit loans and just secured loan.
#21 Posted by Corrine18Frank, CJR on Tue 9 Mar 2010 at 07:17 PM