The “hinge moment” in Klein’s professional development came in April 2005, when, while still hurrying through his UCLA degree in political science, he mentioned on his blog a new healthcare report by the lefty think tank Center for American Progress. “I remember reading the comments, and seeing a lot of people arguing about Canada,” he recalls. “And I thought, Okay, I don’t know anything about the Canadian healthcare system, or any of these healthcare systems. So I told my readers I was going to do this feature for a week called The Health of Nations.” After checking out a bunch of books at a UCLA library, Klein launched a daily stream that summarized health-delivery systems in Japan, Canada, Germany, England, and France. “I mean, they were like Wikipedia entries or something,” he says. “But I loved it! I really thought it was interesting. And the readership really liked it, too. It was useful information, which was not really something that I was providing for them before. That’s when the sort of thing I like to write about began to take shape.”
The timing couldn’t have been better. Not only had Klein entered political blogging at a moment when digital natives were beginning to reconstitute the opinion-journalism profession, but the topic that fused his passion and wonkery—healthcare—was surging back into the public discussion, as progressive ideas resurfaced within American liberalism.
In 2005, just before graduating from UCLA, Klein was hired as a writing fellow at The American Prospect, which was co-founded in 1990 by Robert Kuttner, Robert Reich, and Paul Starr as a sort of exploration of modern Democratic progressivism through the lens of Washington policymaking. Klein says he knew he had found a home when his first real story meeting ended with then-editor Michael Tomasky telling him to go spelunking among the social scientists to figure out “what’s hot” in poverty. “Being at that place where policy journalism was the thing you did was absolutely critical for me,” he says. “Nobody said, ‘That’s too boring.’”
At the Prospect, Klein wrote about procedural Washington reform, tangled with the “ruthlessly serious” liberal hawks at The New Republic, and continued his path-clearing work in the weeds of healthcare delivery systems. His byline started popping up elsewhere, mixing pedagogy with policy prescriptions. “Think money drives medicine? You don’t know the half of it,” he wrote in The Washington Monthly. For Slate, he debunked “The Medical Malpractice Myth.” In the LA Times he advocated “Going Universal.”
In November 2006, a feistier and more economically progressive Democratic Party re-took the House of Representatives, most statehouses, and the US Senate from the gop. Pundits started declaring the death of “neoliberalism,” that strain of liberal commentary first championed at Charles Peters’s Washington Monthly in the early 1970s, in which the primary target was well-intentioned Democratic governance that had gone wrong in practice.
The Village was becoming a friendlier place, not just to the type of return-to-form liberalism Klein preferred, but to the emerging blogger-journalist hybrid he represented. At the beginning of the decade, only a couple of opinion magazines had blogs; by the end, nearly all did. In March 2008, The New York Times took notice of all these Beltway blogger kids, profiling not just one but three DC blogger houses, with such wince-inducing details as an Iron Chef-style cooking contest between Team Liberal (including Klein) and Team Libertarian, duly broadcast on BloggingHeads.tv.
But not everyone was a fan. Washington Times writer Eli Lake dubbed the whole crowd “the Juicebox Mafia.” Blogger Mickey Kaus accused Klein at various points of “hectoring naïveté” and “spout[ing] the party line,” and I once mocked Klein on Reason.com as an “omniscient child pundit.”
I see that the ostensibly libertarian author is increasingly burnishing his establishment credentials. Good for him, and savvy too: CJR is a great place to solicit brownie points from the statist elites.
#1 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 05:00 AM
I've been an admirer of Ezra Klein's work since the early days of the debate on health reform. As a proponent of the single-payer Canadian system, I hope I can be counted among those who urged him to study the health care systems of other nations.
But having done his homework on health systems that are both cost effective and humane, Ezra joined the "political feasibility" gang, allowing Obama and Baucus to keep single-payer off the table, accepting the insurer-dominated and hopelessly inadequate ACA. Would Ezra, the objective, even-handed reporter, have used the political feasibility argument against the suffragists, against the civil rights movement? Let's hope not.
Given his smarts and current megaphone, I wish he'd stand up and holler, "We Americans are paying twice as much for health care as taxpayers in other countries, yet we tolerate poorer outcomes, and leave millions uninsured. How can we be so dumb?"
#2 Posted by Harriette Seiler, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 10:37 AM
Hollering "We (Americans) tolerate poorer outcomes" would be a fabrication. I don't think fibbing should be encouraged.
#3 Posted by KP, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 11:46 AM
Matt's "libertarian" readers at Reason.com skip the time-consuming words in this article and get right to the Klein-bashing, journalist-hating, obscenity-laced, envy-riddled screeds for which narcissistic, "libertarian" commentators are infamous. Eschewing thoughtful, on-topic commentary for adolescent tantrums, they continue to wonder why so few Americans take them seriously, and why libertarianism, as a political movement, is moribund.
#4 Posted by Ed, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 12:09 PM
INTERESTING STORY, but I wonder if there are not some folks, like Willie Geist, originally from the middle of the country, Vanderbilt, who would also serve as 'star profile' journalist fodder..
#5 Posted by Howard M. Romaine, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 02:21 PM
Welch: Keep your head up and ignore the anti-libertarian slights. Kudos on a solid and balanced writeup that, even for one who has worked in same newsroom as Klein, gives shape and an informative context to the trajectory of his career. yours - anonymous pinko-liberal news editor
#6 Posted by pyetrovich, CJR on Tue 4 Sep 2012 at 03:50 PM
Hear hear, pyetrovich. I read every word of the article and I agree: Welch bent over backward (forward?) to balance the article on that phony left-right fulcrum. Well played, Mr. Self-styled Libertarian Magazine Editor guy. Well played.
#7 Posted by Dan A., CJR on Wed 5 Sep 2012 at 08:30 AM
Here's something funny: Todd Aiken is a very, very stupid man. However, he has more real power than 100 Ezra Kleins.
Ezra Klein is the most important journalist in Washington. That's very faint praise.
#8 Posted by oodoodanoo, CJR on Fri 7 Sep 2012 at 07:51 PM
Thanks for an excellent summation of what makes Ezra Klein one of our better policy advocates and analysts. What I find so refreshing about Klein is his dedication to full understanding of the matters he discusses, without indulging in the greatest downfall of most politicos with little life experience outside of academic circles -- he avoids the personal and anecdotal in favor diving into research. Unlike so many other bloggers and columnists whose reliance on self-reference and occasional (Googled?) pithy quotes, Klein takes the time to build his case, present complex issues effectively, and provide plenty of references and links to back up his assertions.
#9 Posted by Jeffrey, CJR on Fri 7 Sep 2012 at 08:01 PM
This is a fine article, but as an outsider to progressivism Welch is confused about the significance of "The New Republic" and the slogan "even the liberal New Republic." I'm 41, I've been following politics since I was a teenager, and my first memory of TNR was its full-throated defense of Reagan's Central America policy; the Wikipedia article on the Contras has a long quote from its editor Michael Kinsley defending their attacks on Nicaraguan civilians. It hasn't been progressive for as long as I can remember.
In the 1980s, Michael Kinsley was joking about how TNR was so often cited taking conservative positions that it should change its name to "even-the-liberal-New-Republic." (As in "Even the liberal New Republic says it's OK to shoot up cooperative farms," I suppose.) It didn't originate in the blogosphere, and Frum's joke inverts the classic line. There are liberal journalists who are TNR alumni, but its relationship with liberalism has always been fraught.
#10 Posted by matt w, CJR on Sat 8 Sep 2012 at 02:22 PM
I have been reading Ezra, Daily Kos and Sullivan for years. Not because I always agree with them. but because I thought they were the ones making the best arguments. They seemed to care about facts and used them to create their arguments. When history, facts or conventional wisdom was against them they dealt with that honestly and tried to give you multiple sides of the argument.
I agreed with Ezra that politically a single payer option was not going to happen, but I think Ezra's big fault was in making it too easy to deal away spo without extracting a political cost from Republicans. Consumers should be able to choose a public option. Why are Republicans supporting limiting customer choice?
#11 Posted by Colleen, CJR on Sun 9 Sep 2012 at 11:26 AM
"Consumers should be able to choose a public option. Why are Republicans supporting limiting customer choice?"
Why are they trying to kill the post office?
http://www.esquire.com/_mobile/blogs/politics/the-post-office-lives-8757430
It's what they must do.
#12 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Sun 9 Sep 2012 at 12:18 PM
this story is an embarrassment. ezra klein is a partisan hack who doesnt even write stories. all he does is link to, and pontificate on, others' work. how is he even a journalist?
#13 Posted by ick, CJR on Mon 8 Oct 2012 at 05:53 PM
Ezra is wonderfully refreshing, extraordinarily smart and in spite of his lisp that so many people talk rudely about (and he has obviously had speech therapy because clearly, it has almost disappeared) Ezra captures the essence of every issue he speaks about, simplifies them to make the complex seem simple and is on the road to having his own show before his 30th birthday. Watching Ezra host The Ed Show with such ease and comfort would make any parent or follower proud. Clearly, I am an Ezra fan and look forward to seeing, hearing and reading more of him.
#14 Posted by David Cohen, CJR on Fri 12 Oct 2012 at 09:32 AM