Moroney and Mong are confident they have the Morning News on the right track. For one thing, they say, their newsroom—which still has some four hundred journalists—remains one of the largest in the country. “I defy you to find many other newspapers in the country with a staff that size,” Mong says. He notes that the paper has won several national awards over the past year, including a 2006 photography Pulitzer for Hurricane Katrina coverage. (Two of the photographers involved in that award, Smiley Pool and Barbara Davidson, have since left the paper.) A story by the investigative reporter Brooks Egerton recently won a National Headliners Award. In February, The Associated Press Sports Editors recognized the paper’s sports section with a Triple Crown award for the seventeenth year. And in June, Paul David Meyer, twenty-nine, and Stella Chavez, thirty-four, won the Livingston Award for national reporting, for a series on the abduction and abuse of a young Mexican girl in the U.S. “Overall, I believe it is a better paper today than it was three or four years ago,” says Moroney. Mong agrees.
We interviewed more than a hundred current and former Morning News people for this article. None agree with that assessment. They say the Morning News remains a first-rate daily but that the elimination of two hundred reporters, editors, photographers, and designers hurt its quality. “I don’t think anyone could deny that,” says Egerton, forty-eight, a fifteen-year veteran at the paper and one of its most respected reporters. “I’ve heard people try to spin it to say that it’s all still there, but that’s clearly not true.” Cheryl Hall, fifty-five, a business columnist and thirty-five-year Morning News veteran, says she has not seen quality improve over the past three years: “We cover less.” Dunklin, a member of the paper’s investigative team, says that, “If you are honest, you have to say it has slipped. You cannot lose the quality and number of journalists we had and not see an impact on the product.” Sherry Jacobson, fifty-six, a metro reporter and former columnist who has worked at the Morning News for more than twenty years, has seen the change. “It had been a journalists’ paper for so long,” Jacobson says. “Now it’s so much more bottom-line driven. But so is the rest of the industry.”
The paper certainly carries more wire-service stories than in the past. We analyzed two weeks of front pages in March 2007. One-third of the stories were wire copy. The trend is particularly noticeable when big national and international news breaks. Take the third week in April: a gunman killed thirty-two students and professors at Virginia Tech; Attorney General Alberto Gonzales, a Texas native, faced harsh criticism for firing U.S. attorneys; U.S. troops in Iraq died at the highest rate of the war; the Supreme Court issued a landmark abortion ruling. Every story on the front page of the Morning News about those events came from the wires. Indeed, of the stories on page one that week, half were wire copy. While the paper often lacks staff-generated national and international stories, Mong and Moroney say readers care more about local news, and that the Morning News excels at local coverage. Mong cited local cultural coverage as an example, saying that readers “expect us to cover the symphony—that is first and foremost a local story—to cover the museums, cover local architecture, cover local theater.”
But the evidence suggests that the sharply reduced staff, working with a smaller newshole, has a difficult time accomplishing that. For example, the daily arts section, Guide Live, used to run a minimum of eight pages. Now it often contains four pages including TV listings and gossip. Freelancers regularly cover concerts and art exhibits and provide architectural reviews. Other newspapers provide many of the Morning News movie reviews. That is not surprising. Between 2004 and 2006, the arts and features sections lost thirty-nine of eighty-three staff members.

Thorough and interesting article. I posted it on my job blog (www.sunoasis.com/jobblog.html
A few points:
1- Down-sizing always happens to real people and not numbers.
2- What is happening in newspapers is a continual erosion of loyalty
between "the company" and the employees. Employees, even journalists have to see themselves as free agents.
3- Writing, editing, reporting talent is very transferrable up and down the labor spectrum.
4- I can see what newspaper management is doing: Cut everything out in the paper that is being done well on the web such as movie, restuarant reviews. Stay local.
5- What is happening today was predicted long ago by Alvin Toffler among others. That is, mass media would be deconstructed across the board once computers were all connected together. At that moment a "communications revolution" is created not simply a technological one.
David Eide
Sunoasis.com
Posted by jobsbard
on Thu 5 Jul 2007 at 12:32 PM
Interesting story. However, I wonder whether it accurately reflects the feelings of all of those who left.
Could it be that only the happy and lucky ex-employees were willing to be interviewed, while those who have flamed out weren't so willing to share?
I also wonder whether researchers asked about finances. Are the happy people also better off financially than they were at the Morning News, or are they happy despite having a lower standard of living and worse benefits?
Posted by ecreager
on Fri 6 Jul 2007 at 09:32 AM
Thanks for explaining how and why my hometown newspaper so quickly became The Dallas Boring News and sadly joined the ranks of the Fort Worth Startlegram and Houston Comical.
Why read the paper or watch its broadcast affiliates if:
• the national and international news goes no deeper than what we’ve already seen in AOL pop-ups.
• they take incidental local news and try to make it tabloid
• they no longer take the time to balance stories or editorials
• they dropped features that made DMN unique or represented the interests of “fly over country”
• you’re not a Cowboy or Stars fan.
To have dropped the opportunity to exploit the Texas connection with Washington makes me think DMN is no longer on the presidents’ reading list either.
If you re-build it, they will come…if it’s not too late.
Posted by DallasBits
on Fri 6 Jul 2007 at 01:03 PM
Tracy,
Your article read like a novel and was well-researched. I feel very happy to have been one of your students! I have a great example to follow in journalism. Cindy (Brown) Mallette
Posted by Jars583
on Sat 21 Jul 2007 at 10:22 AM
All I would have to do is replace the names and this story would be about the paper I work for.
In many respects companies that own newspapers are unwisely placing their money on technology and guessing that the web and videos--warts and all--will be the new frontier for revenue.
"fool's gold" I say to them.
Journalism is a "calling," not just a job. You enter it to serve the public and to help humanity evolve. When those who control newspapers are only in pursuit of profits, the "public service" in journalism is abandoned, and you end up with "infotainment." Why do I remain? The mortgage….
Posted by Worldfoto.org
on Mon 30 Jul 2007 at 06:21 PM
I've lived in Dallas for 25 years, and am not a journalist, but I'm a newspaper reader and am interested from that point of view. One important aspect you failed to mention (and maybe it was not germane to this article) is the extreme political bias of the newspaper. The CEO Robert Decherd is a graduate of the Dallas prep school St. Mark's, and is part of the business elite of the city, which is very much like a country club. His paper consistently sides with business interests (read: Republicans) in this city.
A case in point was the biggest politicial issue this city has seen in the last 50 years, where Dallas voters were to decide on Nov. 6th whether they wanted a toll road inside the Trinity River Park, which is a flood plain. On the pro-toll road side stood the Morning News, the Mayor, 13 of 14 City Council Members, and all the business elite. Although the mayor continued to lie to voters during the campaign, long after the appropriate authorities (like the Army Corps of Engineers) contradicted what he was saying, the Morning News supported him, while failing to show the contradictions. They failed to do simple investigative journalism, like interviewing the Corps of Engineers to verify what the Mayor was saying. On top of that, the Morning News waited until the day after the election (which the pro-toll road side won) to publish articles damaging to the the winning side. In fact, they also sat on damaging information they had a month prior to the election, and waited until post-election to publish it. You can read more about this here: http://www.trinityvote.com/blog/comment.asp?bi=364.
I know several longtime DMN readers who decided to cancel their subscriptions after this political issue, because it was evident that the paper took an elitist attitude, and was not interested in serious journalistic inquiry.
I don't know enough about the newspaper business to know how much this affects readership, but credibility has to be an important factor, right?
Posted by mainbrain
on Thu 6 Dec 2007 at 07:43 PM
Yes it's nice article!
Todd DiRoberto
http://www.newsguide.us/art-entertainment/movies/Todd-DiRoberto-of-American-Satellite-Hosts-Independence-Day-Charity-Event-for-Operation-Bigs/
Posted by amsatpro on Fri 7 Aug 2009 at 05:00 PM
Yes it's nice article!
Todd DiRoberto
http://www.newsguide.us/art-entertainment/movies/Todd-DiRoberto-of-American-Satellite-Hosts-Independence-Day-Charity-Event-for-Operation-Bigs/
Posted by amsatpro on Fri 7 Aug 2009 at 05:01 PM