Family members, former colleagues, important writers, and intimate friends gathered yesterday to praise the critic John Leonard for his “love of the life of the mind,” his “incomparably informed generosity,” his reluctance to “pan books or movies or TV shows or children, except when absolutely necessary”—and his unlikely dependence on just ten words: “tantrum, cathedral, linoleum, moxie, thug, dialectic, splendid, brood, libidinal, and qualm.”
Leonard died of lung cancer the day after Barack Obama was elected president last November, but his family waited until what would have been Leonard’s seventieth birthday to celebrate his life.
The two-hour-and-ten-minute memorial at the Unitarian Church on Central Park West in Manhattan began with a thirty-second welcome from Fran Lebowitz, who strode to the podium in a black suit jacket, white dress shirt, blue jeans, and brown boots—an outfit Leonard would have appreciated, partly because it could have been a sartorial homage to himself.
Lebowitz is one of scores of writers—Toni Morrison, who was also present, is another—who loved Leonard for who he was, and for the fact that he was the first critic to propel her to prominence from his most powerful launching pad, The New York Times.
Here is how Leonard celebrated the then-unknown Lebowitz, when she published Metropolitan Life:
To a base of Huck Finn, add some Lenny Bruce and Oscar Wilde and Alexis de Tocqueville, a dash of cab driver, an assortment of puns, minced jargon, and top it off with smarty-pants. Serve without whine. This is the New York style, and I for one am glad that it survives and prospers because otherwise we might as well grow moss in unsurprising Omaha.
Obviously, he had spotted a kindred spirit.
In the 1960s and ’70s, Leonard was the critical wunderkind of the New York literary world. Hired as an editor of the Sunday New York Times Book Review in the fall of 1967, Leonard became a daily book critic in 1968 and the editor of the Book Review at the end of 1971. No other journalistic ascent has been more meteoric than that.
Three months into his tenure as the Book Review’s boss, Leonard published an issue mostly devoted to books attacking the Vietnam War. He kept the top job at the publication until 1975, when his incapacity to adjust his principles landed him in the position of the Times’s “cultural critic” at large instead. When Leonard returned to being a daily book critic, his review of Lou Cannon’s new biography of Ronald Reagan was killed outright by his increasingly conservative boss, Abe Rosenthal. Then Leonard panned a book by Betty Friedan, a close friend of Rosenthal’s, and the frequency of his daily book reviews was cut in half. Leonard left the paper in 1982, but remained an occasional contributor to the Book Review until the end of his life.
Earlier Leonard had worked for the National Review and had been a student at the University of California, Berkeley. At Berkeley he was also the impresario of “Nightsounds” at KPFA, the local outlet of the Pacifica Foundation, which was one of the earliest promoters of what we would later call the counterculture. Larry Josephson told yesterday’s gathering that tapes of “Nightsounds” were sent by fourth-class mail from KPFA to WBAI in New York, where a young late-night announcer named Bob Fass would play them. This made Leonard the father of free-form radio, a format embraced by Josephson, Steve Post, and, most famously, Fass—whose “Radio Unnameable” on WBAI launched a crucial anti-Vietnam hymn called “Alice’s Restaurant” a few years later.
Josephson called Leonard his “mentor, model, and friend. And my moral compass.…”
John wrote with a machine gun, spraying his readers with a dazzling and daunting fusillade of language.…John never sold out. Let me repeat that: John never sold out.
Before Berkeley, Leonard was an undergraduate at Harvard, where he caught the attention of Victor Navasky with a front-page piece in the Harvard Crimson, under the byline “John D. Leonard” (like “James B. Reston,” Leonard later discarded the middle initial as unnecessary).
A fine remembrance.
Leonard once reviewed, in the daily Times, a Marshall McLuhan volume. Each graf started with a large drop-letter capital. The individual letters, reading down, read 'NONSENSE."
#1 Posted by Hal Davis, CJR on Tue 3 Mar 2009 at 07:56 PM
If Charles Kaiser is able to write a piece that doesn't reference Obama, the Kennedys, the evil Republicans, or just some other stereotype/cliche of a certain sort of push-button urban journalist (I could write this stuff myself, I really could), I have yet to see it. He is as remorselessly partisan-ideological as some 1930s hack for the Daily Worker writing pieces on the social class and political implications of a Yanks-Dodgers World Series. For Kaiser, it is similarly all about narrow political obsessions, with similarly one-dimensional good guys and bad guys; nothing happens that is not relevant to the trivia of American politics. I look forward to his article on 'Obama and the Rebirth of Dutch Portraiture'.
#2 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Wed 4 Mar 2009 at 02:51 PM
Mark Richard: what’s even more ironic is that ol’ Chucky, the champion of the NYC gay community, just finished slobbering all over Bill Moyers the same week that (another) incident of Moyers gay witch hunting came to light.
I guess being a liberal means never having to say you are sorry though.
#3 Posted by Bill Gervas, CJR on Wed 4 Mar 2009 at 03:34 PM
I could not come from DEC to NYC because of the weather between here and there and deeply missed going to a memorial of a person I cared deeply about as a writer, as a commmitted citizen and as a friend. This piece helped me not feel left out and captured the essence of the person I knew. Thank you.
#4 Posted by Curtis Gans, CJR on Wed 4 Mar 2009 at 06:43 PM
Fran Lebowitz told me that when somebody told her John Lennon was shot, she replied, "Why would anyone shoot John Leonard?" She was told "No, John LENNON was shot." "And a wave of relief swept over me."
#5 Posted by Tim Appelo, CJR on Thu 5 Mar 2009 at 02:57 PM
To Bill Gervas, Charles Kaiser's own personal rat: One of the many big differences between you and Kaiser is that you see the entire world through rose-colored glasses. Kaiser does not.
#6 Posted by Rick Whitaker, CJR on Thu 5 Mar 2009 at 03:16 PM
And John Leonard never wrote for The New Yorker.
#7 Posted by S.C. Leonard, CJR on Thu 5 Mar 2009 at 11:03 PM
Здравствуйте, мы решили сделать предложение исключительно для посетителей и администрации вашего форума www.cjr.org. Только Вам доступны VIP скидки на автозапчасти в нашем онлайн-магазине. В заказе Вы должны всего лишь сообщить нам, что Вы с сайта www.cjr.org!
У нас в online-магазине автокомплектующих Expressorder.ru Вы можете найти любые автозапчасти для иномарок как в наличии так и на заказ, в розницу и оптом, как для грузовых, так и легковых автомобилей, а так же на автомобили с правым рулем. На сайте представлены автокомплектующие произведенные в Корее, Европе, Японии, Америке, оригинального и неоригинального производства. Если Вам необходим радиатор, глушители, фары, бампер, автостекла или же другие автомобильные комплектующие, Вы легко можете связаться с нашими квалифицированными менеджерами в Москве или же в том регионе, где находится представительство Expressorder.ru, кроме того самостоятельно подобрать необходимую деталь для Вашего авто. Для этого в online автомагазине имеется "Поиск" по номеру детали, оригинальные и неоригинальные электронные каталоги автозапчастей.
Администрации мы так же хотим предложить обмен ссылочками с нашим порталом. Email для обмена - borisexpress@mail.ru
#8 Posted by BorisExpress, CJR on Thu 23 Apr 2009 at 06:57 AM
Через служебный у него было несравненно больше желания револьвер Бурку. Заявили, что ваш напарник позвал вас.
Решебник по математике виленкин
#9 Posted by sreamela, CJR on Sat 19 Feb 2011 at 06:08 AM