At just about every crucial juncture in his career, Colin Powell has failed his country, and himself.
This sorry record goes all the way back to his time as a young U.S. Army Major posted in Saigon, when, after the My Lai Massacre, he was asked to investigate a soldier’s letter describing atrocities against the Vietnamese people. Powell rejected the charges and famously wrote, “In direct refutation of this portrayal is the fact that relations between American soldiers and the Vietnamese people are excellent.”
On May 4, 2004, when Powell was Secretary of State, he told Larry King, “I mean, I was in a unit that was responsible for My Lai. I got there after My Lai happened. So, in war, these sorts of horrible things happen every now and again, but they are still to be deplored.”
It was also when he was Secretary of State that Powell should have resigned from the government to protest George Bush’s disastrous decision to invade Iraq. Instead, he became the president’s point man at the United Nations, where he delivered a speech riddled with falsehoods about the threats supposedly posed by Saddam Hussein. Craig Unger wrote in The Fall of the House of Bush that Powell must have been aware that the intelligence books had been cooked to distort the case for going to war at the time that he made that speech.
One year ago, Jan Crawford Greenburg reported on ABC News that in the second year of the Bush administration, then-Secretary of State Powell attended meetings chaired by then–National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice in which they discussed specific torture techniques with Vice President Dick Cheney, Attorney General John Ashcroft, Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, and CIA Director George Tenet. Two days later, President Bush confirmed that those meetings had, indeed, taken place in an interview with ABC correspondent Martha Raddatz.
“Ashcroft was troubled by the discussions,” Greenburg reported. “He argued that, while the tactics were legal, senior advisers should not be involved in the grim details. One top official said Ashcroft asked out loud after one meeting, ‘Why are we talking about this in the White House? History will not judge this kindly.’”
Powell, for his part, began making his non-denial denials—countering accusations that he had personally approved torture—by telling Greenburg through a spokesman that there had been “hundreds of Principal Committee meetings…and that he could not recall specifics. And even if he could, he was not at liberty to discuss those meetings anyway.” Then Powell told ABC’s Diane Sawyer that he did not have “sufficient memory recall” about the meetings, adding, “I’m not aware of anything that we discussed in any of those meetings that was not considered legal.”
It's about time somebody outed Powell as the coward and mediocrity he always has been. He's one of the schmucks giving politics a bad name. Would be nice if he were to acknowledge--even too late--that he made egregious and deadly bad decisions.
#1 Posted by Rick Whitaker, CJR on Fri 3 Apr 2009 at 05:56 PM
Where is your evidence about several of your assertions prior to the presentation of the interview? I can understand your concern over the interview, itself. But to make assertions with the least amount of substantiation, if any, is not what I would call a contribution to the "truth."
Are there no standards of evidence in the field of Journalism?
#2 Posted by Robert L. Phillips, CJR on Sat 4 Apr 2009 at 01:26 PM
@charles
You're awfully thin on evidence here charles. Colin Powell has spent quite a bit of time serving the USA. If this unilateral wet dream you call an expose is an example of your objectivity, fact finding and discovery then you came up a little short. Don't know if you use Barney Frank as a resource very much, but you might have noticed he's a little short, in the veracity department.
#3 Posted by paul, CJR on Sun 5 Apr 2009 at 08:27 PM
Colin Powell a coward and a failure? The man was decorated with purple heart, bronze star and silver star recipient, a four star general, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and Secretary of State. He spent nearly his entire life in public service and oversaw the successful operations in Kuwait and Panama but all because he didn’t denounce the dreaded evil Chimpy Mc Hitler, suddenly he’s a failure.
Now I know that some people might think that writing a cliché ridden coming of age memoir about queer New York is certainly on par with Powell’s lifetime of accomplishments, most people I know still highly respect Powell.
And it was nice to see you quote the “esteemed” Craig Unger. Say, is he still peddling those BS stories about how George HW Bush flew to Paris on a modified SR-71 (they only way the time line could work out) to broker a negotiation with the Iranians and make it back for the RNC convention? How did that little chapter in his “investigative journalistic” career work out for him BTW? I guess I shouldn’t be too surprised to see you use him as an authoritative source.
#4 Posted by Bill Gervas, CJR on Mon 6 Apr 2009 at 01:53 PM
This is so sad. The nice kid from Morris High School in the Bronx was in over his head and came up very short of being the great man we wished him to be. Instead, he is part of the 40 Year Black Hole in American History from 1968 to 2008, when our country went badly astray with no great leaders to stop our decline.
#5 Posted by Joe Sherman, CJR on Mon 6 Apr 2009 at 11:50 PM
@Joe.........Don't get all stormy and despondent on us! We had all of those democratic Icons: LBJ, Jimmy Carter, Bill Clinton not so many liberal war heros
unless you count GB Trudeau. Of course the elephants had Nixon (bad), Ford(better) and Yes Renaldus Magnus Reagan(a true leader), the bushes(more like rinos) and just about every other soldier that fought in the wars on terror (sorry, man made conflicts).
#6 Posted by paul, CJR on Tue 7 Apr 2009 at 08:53 AM
Ray McGovern outed Powell as a WMD lying collaborator long ago.
#7 Posted by Ken Hoop, CJR on Wed 8 Apr 2009 at 05:16 PM
Why no mention of Colin Powell as the original public leaker of Valerie Plame, Super Secret Agent fraud that convicted an innocent man? He could have put a stop to Fitzgerald's Soviet style show trial of Liddy. Colon Powell is a despicable man.
#8 Posted by WestWright, CJR on Sun 12 Apr 2009 at 12:55 PM