The story of 33 men trapped underground in a mine in Chile has captivated the entire world, for good reason: it’s a disaster story that’s not a disaster. After living underground for more than two months, they are scheduled to be freed tonight, to be reunited with their families who have been holding vigil since the collapse. It’s an inspirational story of survival that seems made for a movie script.
So the media frenzy isn’t surprising, but perhaps the scope of it is. The AP reported on Monday that 150 news organizations with 750 journalists have been accredited at a police checkpoint near the mine. Thanks to the area’s narrow dirt roads and distant amenities, journalists “have suffered at least 17 accidents while speeding along these roads.” Meanwhile, the miners themselves have apparently been bracing themselves for the spotlight awaiting them at the surface: the men have drawn up a legal contract ensuring that they will all benefit equally from the interview, book and movie deals they’ve already been offered, and they specifically requested media training while still underground.
In the midst of such a media circus, how can news organizations responsibly report this story? What are some dos and don’ts for reporters and television and radio producers on the ground? Feel free to share any stories you have of covering a high-profile event like this. What are the rules of the road here?
Update, Tuesday afternoon: the AP is now putting the number of journalists at the mine site at “upwards of a thousand.”
I'm from Chile. Totally agree with this, here is a shame the circus around this tragedy ...
#1 Posted by Marianela, CJR on Wed 13 Oct 2010 at 10:16 AM
Reporters and editors have the responsibility to not get too swept up in the celebration so as to forget what the other story is here. Last night Doug Saunders of the Globe and Mail wrote on Twitter, "So overnight the story changes from 'Chile has dangerous, shamefully underregulated mines' to 'heroic Chile.' That can't help." I couldn't agree more.
#2 Posted by Lauren Kirchner, CJR on Wed 13 Oct 2010 at 10:58 AM
And it's such a pity, as there is much to be learned here. First, there was considerable technology brought to bear here from all over the world. Nasa played a key roll, as did mining and drilling engineering, land logistics support.
So how about we focus a little on what advanced technology can accomplish, or how organizations can collaborate to solve critical problems, or how governmental entities are uniquely positioned to aid and coordinate large scale technical efforts.
The feel good stupid stuff tell us nothing about what happened excepting the aftermath. But it's the middle story that matters.
#3 Posted by fcc, CJR on Wed 13 Oct 2010 at 10:39 PM