Sometimes, against what we would hope are their better instincts, the respected machers of the cable media world make the mistake of showing the world what a painfully lame sense of humor they have. On CNN’s “The Situation Room” yesterday — in an episode we assume was meant to be funny — the channel’s senior analyst Jeff Greenfield let loose with an inane criticism of Democratic Senator Barack Obama’s wardrobe, upping the ante on the Washington Post’s Hillary/Barack silliness from last week.
The difference is that while the Post’s story was little more than a bit of political scene setting, Greenfield’s comments comparing Senator Obama to Osama bin Laden and Iranian president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, was confounding for its sheer pointlessness and intellectual vapidity.
Greenfield began by telling us that Obama was in New Hampshire over the weekend, “sporting what’s getting to be the classic Obama look. Call it business casual, a jacket, a collared shirt, but no tie.”
How did Greenfield go from a rundown of what the senator was wearing to a comparison to two of the United States’ biggest bogeymen? The path was less complicated than you might think.
Greenfield says that the jacket-without-a-tie “is a look the senator seems to favor,” but “he may be walking around with a sartorial time bomb.”
Here’s where Greenfield goes completely off the reservation — so much so that we have no idea how this wasn’t cut before airtime. “Ask yourself,” Greenfield says, “is there any other major public figure who dresses the way [Obama] does? Why, yes. It is Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who, unlike most of his predecessors, seems to have skipped through enough copies of GQ to find the jacket-and-no-tie look agreeable. And maybe that’s not the comparison a possible presidential contender really wants to evoke.”
That’s right, he actually drew a connection between a U.S. senator and possible presidential candidate and the Holocaust-denying, terrorist-supporting president of Iran —because neither wears a tie. But the most amateurish — and for CNN and Greenfield, the most embarrassing — part of the broadcast was still to come.
“Now, it is one thing to have a last name that sounds like Osama and a middle name, Hussein, that is probably less than helpful,” Greenfield blundered on, “but an outfit that reminds people of a charter member of the axis of evil, why, this could leave his presidential hopes hanging by a thread. Or is that threads?”
Now, we’re not quite so prudish as to demand that every piece of news that CNN, Fox, MSNBC, etc. broadcasts must deal with weighty issues. In a 24-hour news cycle there’s going to be some filler. But when an allegedly serious person, such as Greenfield, trots out such lightweight — and nonsensical — material we have no choice but to call him on the mat.
Next stop on the Jeff Greenfield tour, ladies and germs? The Poconos. At least the amateur circuit.

Jeff Greenfield ceased to be a serious commentator at least 15 years ago, if he ever was serious. Now mostly he spouts the conventional wisdom, and he clearly can't think straight or he'd realize this wasn't funny.
Posted by GuyL on Tue 12 Dec 2006 at 03:10 PM
AS Digby says:
"These fashion "stories" are planted by snotty GOP operatives to trivialize (and feminize) Democrats. All these liberals are a bunch of flaming metrosexual fashionistas, don't you know, thinking about their looks all the time, staring in the mirror, spending tons of money on their appearances. (Remember "Christophe" and the 300 dollar haircut? John Kerry and the botox?)
Democrats are nothing but a bunch of bitches and girlie-men, haven't you heard? This is not an accident or a coincidence, I guarantee it."
(And I wonder how Padikiller will defend CNN in order to attack McLeary. This ought to be interesting)
Posted by not the senator on Tue 12 Dec 2006 at 04:18 PM
I know it isn't television, but Robin Givhan of The Washington Post won a Pulitzer Prize for, among other things, "inane criticism" of Dick Cheney's wardrobe. Is Jeff Greenfield entitled to no less, even if he's talking about (God forbid) a Democrat?
Posted by Dexter Westbrook on Tue 12 Dec 2006 at 09:01 PM
When I sent an e-mail to Jeff Greenfield this morning expressing my disgust over his remarks, I received the following reply: "It was a JOKE, you humorless jerk."
Posted by hatch3 on Tue 12 Dec 2006 at 09:03 PM
Jeff Greenfield clearly is not much of a thinker. When the
Rev Warren's interviews of Obama (first) and McClain (second) were shown, it was mentioned that "Democrats" thought McCain was likely to have heard Obama speaking, which he was not supposed to do and which would have given him a big leg up, what Greenfield said is that that only indicates that the Obama people thought McCain had done better. Duh, no it means that it is likely that McCain had a big advantage by having heard Obama giving his answers and that McCain thought it is fine to cheat ...a lot, and that Greenfield is a jerk.
Posted by Jennifer Morton on Mon 18 Aug 2008 at 07:01 PM