Editor’s Note: Initially this post mistakenly attributed certain statements made by Mark Ash, Jason Leopold’s editor, to Leopold himself. The attribution has since been corrected.
- 1
- 2
Politics — June 13, 2006 03:37 PM
Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again
Now that special prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald has said that he will not seek charges against Karl Rove, will Truthout.org rethink their affiliation with reporter Jason Leopold?
By Paul McLeary
Subscribe to the Columbia Journalism Review at our special Web rates.
—advertisement—
Blog
The Kicker last updated: Fri 4:43 PM
- Greg Craig and Transparency
- Well, It May Deserve an Award in Something
- Now a Little Bit Less Excluded
- Thoughts on the Gelman/Silver Op-Ed
- The Luxury Store Has No Clothes
Desks
The Audit Business
The Observatory Science
- Saving Corwin’s Creatures MSNBC wades into new territory with environmental documentary 100 Heartbeats
- Trains, Planes, and Carbon Offsets Times keeps a needed eye on green premiums
Campaign Desk Politics & Policy
- Greg Craig and Transparency
- Not For All the News in China, Part I Former NYT Shanghai bureau chief Howard French on the coverage of Obama’s trip to Asia
Behind the News The Media
Leopold was able to do this because of only two things: his ideological stance and the Internet. If not for those two things, he would have been another Stephen Glass, only less interesting. But people -- not very bright people -- insisted on believing everything he wrote, even when he was repeatedly proven to be a liar and a plagiarist. They did so because the simply believe everything bad that's written about Bush and the right wing. This, even though there is plenty of TRUE bad stuff written about them every day.
If it weren't for the Internet, he would never have been hired by anyone, or at least not by anyone who would have distributed his nonsense all over the world. There is something to be said for barriers to entry. On the other hand, it is mostly thanks to blogs that this latest lie was seen as such by all but the most vacuous ideologues pretty much right away.
In the meantime, Mr. Leopold and Mr. Ash have done more than anyone I can think of to harm the reputation of blogs as a whole. This isn't fair, of course, but this kind of nonsense is exactly what most people think of when they think of blogs.
It's time for both Mr. Ash and Mr. Leopold -- who are equally to blame for this -- to get the hell out of the business, for the sake of everyone.
Posted by Johnnypotatoes on Tue 13 Jun 2006 at 05:46 PM
Ash and many of the readers of Truthout, amazingly, incredibly, are still standing by the story. This is a jaw-dropping combination of lunacy and a lack of self-awareness....
http://salon.com/politics/war_room/
http://forum.truthout.org/blog/story/2006/6/13/104836/605
Posted by Johnnypotatoes on Tue 13 Jun 2006 at 06:01 PM
Leopold sure went out in a blaze of glory. Clearly the awe and adulation a story like that could bring he and Truthout.org was more important than actually doing any real reporting.
Posted by sirshack on Thu 15 Jun 2006 at 04:02 PM
Don't forget about William Rivers Pitt. He was the Third Man in this TruthOut Troika fraud. As of yet neither Pitt not Ash nor the serial faubulist, Leopold, have admitted error in this Fraud of the Year story.
BTW, Leopold & Pitt are also known as Leopold & Lib.
Find MORE updates on the unfolding Fitzmas Fraud scandal at the DUmmie FUnnies:
DUmmie FUnnies
Posted by PJ-Comix on Thu 15 Jun 2006 at 05:10 PM
It's just one story, and it's not like the fate of the nation hangs in the balance -- unlike, say, the NYT stories peddling MONTHS of Bush bullshit on the Iraq war.
Jesus, sometimes I just don't get the the hyper-frenzied world of the blogosphere, especially the way the "left" eats its own, and abets the MSM in marginalizing dissent.
How many millions of things has Drudge gotten wrong over the years -- and he's still quoted in the fucking MSM as a reliable source?
It seems to me that even in the worst-case scenario for the Leopold story, all you would have is that an investigative reporter got burned by his sources. This happens to every reporter; even Sy Hersh has been burned spectacularly on a few occasions. Again, the level of anger and personal animus at Leopold is incomprehensible to me. If the sources were wrong, either unwittingly or deliberately, then the story was wrong.
This is an occupational hazard of journalism.
Why this should result in such vitriolic personal attacks on Leopold is something I can't fathom. Even from here - the alleged bastion of American Journalism.
Every single element of the Plame story and the Fitzgerald investigation has played out very slowly, with the truth emerging only months, even years later.
Why should we assume the word of Luskin, Rove's lawyer, simply settles the matter? He won't release the actual document according to TMPmuckraker. Fitzgerald has made no comment yet. Note the smelted language in Luskin's press release.
Why not let it play out and see what happens? Why this rush to pillory an investigator just because his story made some very powerful people uncomfortable for a minute or two?
Posted by Expatriate on Fri 16 Jun 2006 at 02:23 AM
PAUL MCLEARY IS A LIAR.
I have challenged CJR and Paul McLeary for libeling and defaming me by knowing using statements that are completely untrue.
For those who care about balance my attorneys sent CJR and Mr. McLeary this legal letter when they refused to correct the story.
June 19, 2006
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Evan Cornog, Publisher
Columbia Journalism Review
Journalism Building
2950 Broadway
Columbia University
New York, New York 10027
Re: Jason Leopold / "Three Strikes, You're Out – Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again" by Paul McLeary
Dear Mr Cornog:
I am writing on behalf of our client, Jason Leopold, with respect to the article written by Paul McLeary and published by Columbia Journalism Review on June 13, 2006. The article contains a series of false and defamatory statements concerning our client, Jason Leopold.
We request that Columbia Journalism Review, CJRdaily, Paul McLeary, and the University of Columbia School of Journalism ("CJR"):
Issue an immediate written correction and retraction of those defamatory statements and publish such correction and retraction in substantially as conspicuous a manner as the original defamatory publication(s), in a regular issue thereof published or broadcast;
Immediately remove, and cease and desist from publishing any further defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold; and
CJR immediately identify in writing any and all media, editors, and publishers to whom CJR has sent the subject article, including via email, and immediately advise all such media of the correction and retraction demanded herein.
The defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold in the subject article are as follows:
"Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again"
The statement that Mr. Leopold has been caught sourceless on multiple occasions is untrue.
"We wonder if the folks over at Truthout.org are rethinking their affiliation with reporter and serial fabulist Jason Leopold."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold is not a "serial fabulist".
"Leopold, you may recall, is the freelance reporter who was caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article, and had his own memoir cancelled because of concerns of the accuracy of quotations."
"But the book was not to be"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was never "caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold's book was not only published but was on Los Angeles Times Bestseller List at the time this article was published. While it is certainly fair to note that Mr. Leopold’s first publisher did not publish Mr. Leopold’s book, it is not acceptable to defame Mr. Leopold with the false claim that his book was cancelled because of concerns over accuracy or to imply, as the article does, that the book was not to be, and was never published.
"Leopold’s latest addition to his application for membership in the Stephen Glass school of journalism came on May 12 of this year..."
Stephen Glass is know for being an admitted liar and fabricator of stories. The clear implication is that Mr. Leopold is also a fabricator is stories. Mr. Leopold is not a fabricator of stories.
After all this certainty comes Leopold's latest version of the story, published yesterday, where he writes that he based his original article "on single source information and general background information obtained from experts. The conclusions we arrive at should be considered carefully, but not taken as statements of fact, per se."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
Leopold says that he knows "for certain" that there exists a federal indictment called "06 cr 128" which he refers to as "(Sealed vs. Sealed)" since neither party's name is on the document. He also knows that this indictment "was returned by the same grand jury that has been hearing matters related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Mr. Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
So much for what Leopold knows. Apparently, Leopold is a very religious man, because he "believes" quite a bit about the alleged indictment. He believes that it "is directly related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation. That's based on a single credible source." He goes on to list several other things he "believes" to be true, all fed to him by, in his words, the "same single credible source."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
"Salon removed Leopold's August 29, 2002 story about Enron from its site after it was discovered that he plagiarized parts from the Financial Times and was unable to provide a copy of an email that was critical to the piece."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was able, and did in fact; provide the aforementioned email to Salon.com. Salon’s concern had to do with authenticating the email.
The above statements are unprivileged and defamatory per se, in that they tend directly to injure Mr. Leopold in that they are an unprivileged and expose Mr. Leopold to "to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation" Cal. Civ. Code § 45.
Surprisingly, Mr. Leopold was never contacted for comment on this article. Quotes were wrongly attributed to Mr. Leopold and then used by the author to bolster the attack on Mr. Leopold’s credibility. A basic investigation into Mr. Leopold reveals that his book was published and is available. Further, Mr. Leopold’s book is cited with a link on every story he writes for Truthout, including the ones Paul McLeary cites in his article. McLeary ignores those facts and gives the impression to CJR's readers that Mr. Leopold's book was never published and is not available.
The article has caused damage to Mr. Leopold and continues to cause him damage. Mr. Leopold is currently promoting his book. This article is harming his ability to secure interviews and otherwise harming him professionally. We demand that you immediately take steps to mitigate the damage your defamatory actions are causing.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss the matter.
Sincerely,
David J. Brown
Attorney at Law
Egerman & Brown, LLC.
Posted by JasonLeopold![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Sat 2 Jun 2007 at 02:49 AM
On April, 23, 2007, a federal agency launched an extensive investigation into the activities of the White House's political operation and its architect, Karl Rove.
In this perspective, how would Paul McLeary comment on that?
Henrik Steen
Oslo, Norway
Posted by Henrik Steen![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Tue 26 Jun 2007 at 08:55 AM
To the readers of this article, I am the media reporter for the washington post and I can tell all of you, unequivocally, that Mr. McLeary has been taken to task on numerous occasions for his sloppy journalism and for making up quotes. His hatchet piece on Mr. Leopold has less to do with Mr. Leopold's reporting, which has since proved reliable and trustworthy, and more to do with the fact that Mr. McLeary was put up to this article by senior editors at Salon who Mr. Leopold wrote about unflatteringly in his book, News Junkie.
This is a fact and should be kept in mind when reading this awful, incorrect story.
In his rush to smear Mr Leopold Mr. McLeary got the basic facts of his story wrong as can be seen by the correction at the end of his piece.
Mr. McLeary is a terrible reporter and committed his own journalistic crime by not disclosing his relationship with individuals at Salon or attempting to contact Mr. Leopold for his side of the story. For CJR to fail that basic journalistic requirement speaks volumes about Mr. McLeary's reporting.
Posted by howardkurtz![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Fri 15 Feb 2008 at 11:43 PM
And the fact that you have been the focus of McLeary's articles on multiple occasions on this site has little to do with your extremely late entry to this article's comments, Mr. Kurtz?
For my own sense of curiosity, what do we have besides your word that any relationship exists with individuals as Salon?
Posted by AhmNee![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Wed 20 Feb 2008 at 03:44 PM
FYI: We’ve checked with Howard Kurtz, and, not surprisingly, he says he’s not the author of the above comment.
Clint Hendler
Assistant Editor, CJR
Posted by Clint Hendler![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Wed 20 Feb 2008 at 04:47 PM
Gah! Fell for the troll.
Really, we aught to be setting out traps. There seems to be an infestation.
Let's see ... who could the mystery troll be ... it would have to be someone who's not above using misinformation and flawed logic ... someone who has particular issue with Paul McLeary.
I wonder who it could be.
Posted by AhmNee![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Thu 21 Feb 2008 at 11:19 AM
AhmNee seems to have a rather unhealthy fixation on me...
More than a little creepy...
And, for the record... I haven't posted any comments on this post until now.
Posted by padikiller![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Thu 21 Feb 2008 at 07:33 PM
So a Howard Kurtz impersonator's comments are allowed to stand in stark violation of CJR's Orwellian commenting policy against impersonation...
But when I simply and fairly criticized Nick Lemann's front page piece, my comments were snatched off the board lickety split by the CJR censors.
Such is life in the gulags of McLearyland...
Posted by padikiller![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Thu 21 Feb 2008 at 10:49 PM
How interesting you assume I was talking about you.
You're so vain. I bet you think this post is about you. Don't you? Don't you? Don't you?
Heh heh.
Posted by AhmNee![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Fri 22 Feb 2008 at 11:22 AM
AhmNee wrote
...it would have to be someone who's not above using misinformation and flawed logic...
padikiller wonders
Perhaps like someone who ignorantly claimed here that the Pilgrims sent smallpox infested to the Indians after celebrating the first Thanksgiving in triumph over subjugating them?....
Or like the guy who stupidly claimed that the UN was running the (NATO-led) war in Afghanistan?....
Or the dude who made a fool out of himself by claiming that the high unemployment in Baltimore (in reality, significantly lower than the national average) justified the voluntary underemployment of a Volvo-driving, home owning middle-class couple who used the spare time they garnered through "intermittent" employment to pimp their kid for welfare?...
Or the absolute nut who claimed that Danny Pearl wansn't tortured?.....
Posted by padikiller![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Sat 23 Feb 2008 at 02:45 PM
You are an absolute hoot.
Though when you put it that way, I guess I can see how you thought I was talking about you. That's about all you had in any of those discussions was misinformation and flawed logic. I'll happily re-debate any of those topics with you. You couldn't make your case the first time around, I doubt you will fare any better a second time at bat.
You'll have to refresh my memory on the Afghanistan claim, however. I have no recollection to what you're referring to there.
Perhaps we can find someplace better suited for such a rousing discourse as well. Rather than a thread rapidly approaching the 2 year old mark.
Posted by AhmNee![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Fri 7 Mar 2008 at 02:31 AM
What makes you think I was talking about you?
Funny how you want to run away from here now, since you're the one who started the discourse...
Posted by padikiller![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Fri 7 Mar 2008 at 05:01 PM
Because you've specifically sited conversations we've had in the past. Don't try to turn my own words against me, Padi. You're not good enough at it.
I'm not trying to 'run away from' anywhere. I simply think that going completely off topic in a 2 year old thread is hardly the place for this debate. And as you'll remember, you were the one who identified yourself as the 'subject' of my earlier post when "someone who's not above using misinformation and flawed logic ... someone who has particular issue with Paul McLeary" could refer to several people who visit here not the least being the subject of the OP, you just happen to be our most frequent flyer.
Posted by AhmNee![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Fri 7 Mar 2008 at 06:00 PM
AhmNee Blithered
I'm not trying to 'run away from' anywhere. I simply think that going completely off topic in a 2 year old thread is hardly the place for this debate...
padikiller wonders
Then WHY did YOU "go" in a direction that's "completely off topic" here?...
HUH?....
You went down the rabbit hole on this one, Sport....
Posted by padikiller![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Fri 7 Mar 2008 at 09:35 PM
Are you blaming me for your tangent?
Posted by AhmNee![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Mon 10 Mar 2008 at 01:31 PM
June 19, 2006
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Evan Cornog, Publisher
Columbia Journalism Review
Journalism Building
2950 Broadway
Columbia University
New York, New York 10027
Re: Jason Leopold / "Three Strikes, You're Out – Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again" by Paul McLeary
Dear Mr Cornog:
I am writing on behalf of our client, Jason Leopold, with respect to the article written by Paul McLeary and published by Columbia Journalism Review on June 13, 2006. The article contains a series of false and defamatory statements concerning our client, Jason Leopold.
We request that Columbia Journalism Review, CJRdaily, Paul McLeary, and the University of Columbia School of Journalism ("CJR"):
Issue an immediate written correction and retraction of those defamatory statements and publish such correction and retraction in substantially as conspicuous a manner as the original defamatory publication(s), in a regular issue thereof published or broadcast;
Immediately remove, and cease and desist from publishing any further defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold; and
CJR immediately identify in writing any and all media, editors, and publishers to whom CJR has sent the subject article, including via email, and immediately advise all such media of the correction and retraction demanded herein.
The defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold in the subject article are as follows:
"Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again"
The statement that Mr. Leopold has been caught sourceless on multiple occasions is untrue.
"We wonder if the folks over at Truthout.org are rethinking their affiliation with reporter and serial fabulist Jason Leopold."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold is not a "serial fabulist".
"Leopold, you may recall, is the freelance reporter who was caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article, and had his own memoir cancelled because of concerns of the accuracy of quotations."
"But the book was not to be"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was never "caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold's book was not only published but was on Los Angeles Times Bestseller List at the time this article was published. While it is certainly fair to note that Mr. Leopold’s first publisher did not publish Mr. Leopold’s book, it is not acceptable to defame Mr. Leopold with the false claim that his book was cancelled because of concerns over accuracy or to imply, as the article does, that the book was not to be, and was never published.
"Leopold’s latest addition to his application for membership in the Stephen Glass school of journalism came on May 12 of this year..."
Stephen Glass is know for being an admitted liar and fabricator of stories. The clear implication is that Mr. Leopold is also a fabricator is stories. Mr. Leopold is not a fabricator of stories.
After all this certainty comes Leopold's latest version of the story, published yesterday, where he writes that he based his original article "on single source information and general background information obtained from experts. The conclusions we arrive at should be considered carefully, but not taken as statements of fact, per se."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
Leopold says that he knows "for certain" that there exists a federal indictment called "06 cr 128" which he refers to as "(Sealed vs. Sealed)" since neither party's name is on the document. He also knows that this indictment "was returned by the same grand jury that has been hearing matters related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Mr. Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
So much for what Leopold knows. Apparently, Leopold is a very religious man, because he "believes" quite a bit about the alleged indictment. He believes that it "is directly related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation. That's based on a single credible source." He goes on to list several other things he "believes" to be true, all fed to him by, in his words, the "same single credible source."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
"Salon removed Leopold's August 29, 2002 story about Enron from its site after it was discovered that he plagiarized parts from the Financial Times and was unable to provide a copy of an email that was critical to the piece."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was able, and did in fact; provide the aforementioned email to Salon.com. Salon’s concern had to do with authenticating the email.
The above statements are unprivileged and defamatory per se, in that they tend directly to injure Mr. Leopold in that they are an unprivileged and expose Mr. Leopold to "to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation" Cal. Civ. Code § 45.
Surprisingly, Mr. Leopold was never contacted for comment on this article. Quotes were wrongly attributed to Mr. Leopold and then used by the author to bolster the attack on Mr. Leopold’s credibility. A basic investigation into Mr. Leopold reveals that his book was published and is available. Further, Mr. Leopold’s book is cited with a link on every story he writes for Truthout, including the ones Paul McLeary cites in his article. McLeary ignores those facts and gives the impression to CJR's readers that Mr. Leopold's book was never published and is not available.
The article has caused damage to Mr. Leopold and continues to cause him damage. Mr. Leopold is currently promoting his book. This article is harming his ability to secure interviews and otherwise harming him professionally. We demand that you immediately take steps to mitigate the damage your defamatory actions are causing.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss the matter.
Posted by howardkurtz![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Fri 14 Mar 2008 at 02:12 AM
Howard,
What's your point in this triple play? So Leopold is claiming to be defamed. What else is new? Oh, you've negelcted to refer to your own article on this issue written in March, 2005 noting, "Now the former Los Angeles Times and Dow Jones reporter has written a book, "Off the Record," that criticizes journalists as lazy. Oh, and by the way, Leopold says he engaged in "lying, cheating and backstabbing," is a former cocaine addict, served time for grand larceny, repeatedly tried to kill himself and has battled mental illness his whole life."
So which is it Howard? Is Leopold being mercilessly defamed, or was you're '05 piece more accurate?
Posted by Jack![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Sat 15 Mar 2008 at 05:06 PM
Howard, Just in case you have trouble finding and referring to your own earlier work in regards to the quality of Leopold's journalism the link is noted below.
This is the best part, "The release fleshes out a troubled career. Leopold says his grand larceny
conviction in 1996 was for stealing compact discs from his employer, a New York music company, and reselling them to record stores. He says he was fired by the Los Angeles Times "for threatening to rip a reporter's head off." Leopold says he quit Dow Jones Newswires in a dispute over his beat but later learned the news service was planning to fire him because of a correction to one of his Enron stories: "Seems I got all of the facts wrong."
Leopold now says he was "brutally honest" in the book and admits to making "many mistakes. . . . I was hoping it would allow me to find some sort of redemption."
://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18624-2005Mar8.html
Posted by Jack![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Sun 16 Mar 2008 at 09:04 PM
Jack, thats not Howard Kurtz. Leopold is well known for using sockpuppets to post things on the internet.
Posted by TDC![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Tue 18 Mar 2008 at 10:56 AM
June 19, 2006
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Evan Cornog, Publisher
Columbia Journalism Review
Journalism Building
2950 Broadway
Columbia University
New York, New York 10027
Re: Jason Leopold / "Three Strikes, You're Out – Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again" by Paul McLeary
Dear Mr Cornog:
I am writing on behalf of our client, Jason Leopold, with respect to the article written by Paul McLeary and published by Columbia Journalism Review on June 13, 2006. The article contains a series of false and defamatory statements concerning our client, Jason Leopold.
We request that Columbia Journalism Review, CJRdaily, Paul McLeary, and the University of Columbia School of Journalism ("CJR"):
Issue an immediate written correction and retraction of those defamatory statements and publish such correction and retraction in substantially as conspicuous a manner as the original defamatory publication(s), in a regular issue thereof published or broadcast;
Immediately remove, and cease and desist from publishing any further defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold; and
CJR immediately identify in writing any and all media, editors, and publishers to whom CJR has sent the subject article, including via email, and immediately advise all such media of the correction and retraction demanded herein.
The defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold in the subject article are as follows:
"Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again"
The statement that Mr. Leopold has been caught sourceless on multiple occasions is untrue.
"We wonder if the folks over at Truthout.org are rethinking their affiliation with reporter and serial fabulist Jason Leopold."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold is not a "serial fabulist".
"Leopold, you may recall, is the freelance reporter who was caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article, and had his own memoir cancelled because of concerns of the accuracy of quotations."
"But the book was not to be"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was never "caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold's book was not only published but was on Los Angeles Times Bestseller List at the time this article was published. While it is certainly fair to note that Mr. Leopold’s first publisher did not publish Mr. Leopold’s book, it is not acceptable to defame Mr. Leopold with the false claim that his book was cancelled because of concerns over accuracy or to imply, as the article does, that the book was not to be, and was never published.
"Leopold’s latest addition to his application for membership in the Stephen Glass school of journalism came on May 12 of this year..."
Stephen Glass is know for being an admitted liar and fabricator of stories. The clear implication is that Mr. Leopold is also a fabricator is stories. Mr. Leopold is not a fabricator of stories.
After all this certainty comes Leopold's latest version of the story, published yesterday, where he writes that he based his original article "on single source information and general background information obtained from experts. The conclusions we arrive at should be considered carefully, but not taken as statements of fact, per se."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
Leopold says that he knows "for certain" that there exists a federal indictment called "06 cr 128" which he refers to as "(Sealed vs. Sealed)" since neither party's name is on the document. He also knows that this indictment "was returned by the same grand jury that has been hearing matters related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Mr. Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
So much for what Leopold knows. Apparently, Leopold is a very religious man, because he "believes" quite a bit about the alleged indictment. He believes that it "is directly related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation. That's based on a single credible source." He goes on to list several other things he "believes" to be true, all fed to him by, in his words, the "same single credible source."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
"Salon removed Leopold's August 29, 2002 story about Enron from its site after it was discovered that he plagiarized parts from the Financial Times and was unable to provide a copy of an email that was critical to the piece."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was able, and did in fact; provide the aforementioned email to Salon.com. Salon’s concern had to do with authenticating the email.
The above statements are unprivileged and defamatory per se, in that they tend directly to injure Mr. Leopold in that they are an unprivileged and expose Mr. Leopold to "to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation" Cal. Civ. Code § 45.
Surprisingly, Mr. Leopold was never contacted for comment on this article. Quotes were wrongly attributed to Mr. Leopold and then used by the author to bolster the attack on Mr. Leopold’s credibility. A basic investigation into Mr. Leopold reveals that his book was published and is available. Further, Mr. Leopold’s book is cited with a link on every story he writes for Truthout, including the ones Paul McLeary cites in his article. McLeary ignores those facts and gives the impression to CJR's readers that Mr. Leopold's book was never published and is not available.
The article has caused damage to Mr. Leopold and continues to cause him damage. Mr. Leopold is currently promoting his book. This article is harming his ability to secure interviews and otherwise harming him professionally. We demand that you immediately take steps to mitigate the damage your defamatory actions are causing.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss the matter.
Posted by howardkurtz![[TypeKey Profile Page]](http://www.cjr.org/nav-commenters.gif)
on Fri 18 Apr 2008 at 11:46 PM
Jason Leopold is not interested in the truth. He does not check his sources if he even has them. I believe he simply makes up things. He should be sued for libel. I sincerely hope Murlene Wilkes takes a lawsuit into her consideration. One that includes Branchflower.
Posted by Tammi Lindsey on Wed 1 Oct 2008 at 10:37 PM
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Evan Cornog, Publisher
Columbia Journalism Review
Journalism Building
2950 Broadway
Columbia University
New York, New York 10027
Re: Jason Leopold / "Three Strikes, You're Out – Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again" by Paul McLeary
Dear Mr Cornog:
I am writing on behalf of our client, Jason Leopold, with respect to the article written by Paul McLeary and published by Columbia Journalism Review on June 13, 2006. The article contains a series of false and defamatory statements concerning our client, Jason Leopold.
We request that Columbia Journalism Review, CJRdaily, Paul McLeary, and the University of Columbia School of Journalism ("CJR"):
Issue an immediate written correction and retraction of those defamatory statements and publish such correction and retraction in substantially as conspicuous a manner as the original defamatory publication(s), in a regular issue thereof published or broadcast;
Immediately remove, and cease and desist from publishing any further defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold; and
CJR immediately identify in writing any and all media, editors, and publishers to whom CJR has sent the subject article, including via email, and immediately advise all such media of the correction and retraction demanded herein.
The defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold in the subject article are as follows:
"Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again"
The statement that Mr. Leopold has been caught sourceless on multiple occasions is untrue.
"We wonder if the folks over at Truthout.org are rethinking their affiliation with reporter and serial fabulist Jason Leopold."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold is not a "serial fabulist".
"Leopold, you may recall, is the freelance reporter who was caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article, and had his own memoir cancelled because of concerns of the accuracy of quotations."
"But the book was not to be"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was never "caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold's book was not only published but was on Los Angeles Times Bestseller List at the time this article was published. While it is certainly fair to note that Mr. Leopold’s first publisher did not publish Mr. Leopold’s book, it is not acceptable to defame Mr. Leopold with the false claim that his book was cancelled because of concerns over accuracy or to imply, as the article does, that the book was not to be, and was never published.
"Leopold’s latest addition to his application for membership in the Stephen Glass school of journalism came on May 12 of this year..."
Stephen Glass is know for being an admitted liar and fabricator of stories. The clear implication is that Mr. Leopold is also a fabricator is stories. Mr. Leopold is not a fabricator of stories.
After all this certainty comes Leopold's latest version of the story, published yesterday, where he writes that he based his original article "on single source information and general background information obtained from experts. The conclusions we arrive at should be considered carefully, but not taken as statements of fact, per se."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
Leopold says that he knows "for certain" that there exists a federal indictment called "06 cr 128" which he refers to as "(Sealed vs. Sealed)" since neither party's name is on the document. He also knows that this indictment "was returned by the same grand jury that has been hearing matters related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Mr. Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
So much for what Leopold knows. Apparently, Leopold is a very religious man, because he "believes" quite a bit about the alleged indictment. He believes that it "is directly related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation. That's based on a single credible source." He goes on to list several other things he "believes" to be true, all fed to him by, in his words, the "same single credible source."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
"Salon removed Leopold's August 29, 2002 story about Enron from its site after it was discovered that he plagiarized parts from the Financial Times and was unable to provide a copy of an email that was critical to the piece."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was able, and did in fact; provide the aforementioned email to Salon.com. Salon’s concern had to do with authenticating the email.
The above statements are unprivileged and defamatory per se, in that they tend directly to injure Mr. Leopold in that they are an unprivileged and expose Mr. Leopold to "to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation" Cal. Civ. Code § 45.
Surprisingly, Mr. Leopold was never contacted for comment on this article. Quotes were wrongly attributed to Mr. Leopold and then used by the author to bolster the attack on Mr. Leopold’s credibility. A basic investigation into Mr. Leopold reveals that his book was published and is available. Further, Mr. Leopold’s book is cited with a link on every story he writes for Truthout, including the ones Paul McLeary cites in his article. McLeary ignores those facts and gives the impression to CJR's readers that Mr. Leopold's book was never published and is not available.
The article has caused damage to Mr. Leopold and continues to cause him damage. Mr. Leopold is currently promoting his book. This article is harming his ability to secure interviews and otherwise harming him professionally. We demand that you immediately take steps to mitigate the damage your defamatory actions are causing.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss the matter.
Posted by howardkurtz [TypeKey Profile Page] on Fri 14 Mar 2008 at 02:12 AM
Howard,
What's your point in this triple play? So Leopold is claiming to be defamed. What else is new? Oh, you've negelcted to refer to your own article on this issue written in March, 2005 noting, "Now the former Los Angeles Times and Dow Jones reporter has written a book, "Off the Record," that criticizes journalists as lazy. Oh, and by the way, Leopold says he engaged in "lying, cheating and backstabbing," is a former cocaine addict, served time for grand larceny, repeatedly tried to kill himself and has battled mental illness his whole life."
So which is it Howard? Is Leopold being mercilessly defamed, or was you're '05 piece more accurate?
Posted by Jack [TypeKey Profile Page] on Sat 15 Mar 2008 at 05:06 PM
Howard, Just in case you have trouble finding and referring to your own earlier work in regards to the quality of Leopold's journalism the link is noted below.
This is the best part, "The release fleshes out a troubled career. Leopold says his grand larceny
conviction in 1996 was for stealing compact discs from his employer, a New York music company, and reselling them to record stores. He says he was fired by the Los Angeles Times "for threatening to rip a reporter's head off." Leopold says he quit Dow Jones Newswires in a dispute over his beat but later learned the news service was planning to fire him because of a correction to one of his Enron stories: "Seems I got all of the facts wrong."
Leopold now says he was "brutally honest" in the book and admits to making "many mistakes. . . . I was hoping it would allow me to find some sort of redemption."
://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A18624-2005Mar8.html
Posted by Jack [TypeKey Profile Page] on Sun 16 Mar 2008 at 09:04 PM
Jack, thats not Howard Kurtz. Leopold is well known for using sockpuppets to post things on the internet.
Posted by TDC [TypeKey Profile Page] on Tue 18 Mar 2008 at 10:56 AM
June 19, 2006
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Evan Cornog, Publisher
Columbia Journalism Review
Journalism Building
2950 Broadway
Columbia University
New York, New York 10027
Re: Jason Leopold / "Three Strikes, You're Out – Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again" by Paul McLeary
Dear Mr Cornog:
I am writing on behalf of our client, Jason Leopold, with respect to the article written by Paul McLeary and published by Columbia Journalism Review on June 13, 2006. The article contains a series of false and defamatory statements concerning our client, Jason Leopold.
We request that Columbia Journalism Review, CJRdaily, Paul McLeary, and the University of Columbia School of Journalism ("CJR"):
Issue an immediate written correction and retraction of those defamatory statements and publish such correction and retraction in substantially as conspicuous a manner as the original defamatory publication(s), in a regular issue thereof published or broadcast;
Immediately remove, and cease and desist from publishing any further defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold; and
CJR immediately identify in writing any and all media, editors, and publishers to whom CJR has sent the subject article, including via email, and immediately advise all such media of the correction and retraction demanded herein.
The defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold in the subject article are as follows:
"Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again"
The statement that Mr. Leopold has been caught sourceless on multiple occasions is untrue.
"We wonder if the folks over at Truthout.org are rethinking their affiliation with reporter and serial fabulist Jason Leopold."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold is not a "serial fabulist".
"Leopold, you may recall, is the freelance reporter who was caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article, and had his own memoir cancelled because of concerns of the accuracy of quotations."
"But the book was not to be"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was never "caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold's book was not only published but was on Los Angeles Times Bestseller List at the time this article was published. While it is certainly fair to note that Mr. Leopold’s first publisher did not publish Mr. Leopold’s book, it is not acceptable to defame Mr. Leopold with the false claim that his book was cancelled because of concerns over accuracy or to imply, as the article does, that the book was not to be, and was never published.
"Leopold’s latest addition to his application for membership in the Stephen Glass school of journalism came on May 12 of this year..."
Stephen Glass is know for being an admitted liar and fabricator of stories. The clear implication is that Mr. Leopold is also a fabricator is stories. Mr. Leopold is not a fabricator of stories.
After all this certainty comes Leopold's latest version of the story, published yesterday, where he writes that he based his original article "on single source information and general background information obtained from experts. The conclusions we arrive at should be considered carefully, but not taken as statements of fact, per se."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
Leopold says that he knows "for certain" that there exists a federal indictment called "06 cr 128" which he refers to as "(Sealed vs. Sealed)" since neither party's name is on the document. He also knows that this indictment "was returned by the same grand jury that has been hearing matters related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Mr. Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
So much for what Leopold knows. Apparently, Leopold is a very religious man, because he "believes" quite a bit about the alleged indictment. He believes that it "is directly related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation. That's based on a single credible source." He goes on to list several other things he "believes" to be true, all fed to him by, in his words, the "same single credible source."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
"Salon removed Leopold's August 29, 2002 story about Enron from its site after it was discovered that he plagiarized parts from the Financial Times and was unable to provide a copy of an email that was critical to the piece."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was able, and did in fact; provide the aforementioned email to Salon.com. Salon’s concern had to do with authenticating the email.
The above statements are unprivileged and defamatory per se, in that they tend directly to injure Mr. Leopold in that they are an unprivileged and expose Mr. Leopold to "to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation" Cal. Civ. Code § 45.
Surprisingly, Mr. Leopold was never contacted for comment on this article. Quotes were wrongly attributed to Mr. Leopold and then used by the author to bolster the attack on Mr. Leopold’s credibility. A basic investigation into Mr. Leopold reveals that his book was published and is available. Further, Mr. Leopold’s book is cited with a link on every story he writes for Truthout, including the ones Paul McLeary cites in his article. McLeary ignores those facts and gives the impression to CJR's readers that Mr. Leopold's book was never published and is not available.
The article has caused damage to Mr. Leopold and continues to cause him damage. Mr. Leopold is currently promoting his book. This article is harming his ability to secure interviews and otherwise harming him professionally. We demand that you immediately take steps to mitigate the damage your defamatory actions are causing.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss the matter.
Posted by jasonleopoldsuedCJR on Thu 11 Dec 2008 at 01:26 PM
Wow Jason, you hired Howard Kurtz to be your lawyer? Ha ha! Now you weren't just caught sourceless, you were caught sockpuppeting, too!
I don't see how you find the time to simultaneously troll these comments AND attempt to sanitize your Wikipedia entry. You must not sleep very much. Or perhaps that's your "journalistic conscience" keeping you awake. (Please pardon the oxymoron.)
Posted by NowWe'reConvinced! on Sat 14 Feb 2009 at 04:56 PM
VIA FACSIMILE AND U.S. MAIL
Evan Cornog, Publisher
Columbia Journalism Review
Journalism Building
2950 Broadway
Columbia University
New York, New York 10027
Re: Jason Leopold / "Three Strikes, You're Out – Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again" by Paul McLeary
Dear Mr Cornog:
I am writing on behalf of our client, Jason Leopold, with respect to the article written by Paul McLeary and published by Columbia Journalism Review on June 13, 2006. The article contains a series of false and defamatory statements concerning our client, Jason Leopold.
We request that Columbia Journalism Review, CJRdaily, Paul McLeary, and the University of Columbia School of Journalism ("CJR"):
Issue an immediate written correction and retraction of those defamatory statements and publish such correction and retraction in substantially as conspicuous a manner as the original defamatory publication(s), in a regular issue thereof published or broadcast;
Immediately remove, and cease and desist from publishing any further defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold; and
CJR immediately identify in writing any and all media, editors, and publishers to whom CJR has sent the subject article, including via email, and immediately advise all such media of the correction and retraction demanded herein.
The defamatory statements concerning Mr. Leopold in the subject article are as follows:
"Jason Leopold Caught Sourceless Again"
The statement that Mr. Leopold has been caught sourceless on multiple occasions is untrue.
"We wonder if the folks over at Truthout.org are rethinking their affiliation with reporter and serial fabulist Jason Leopold."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold is not a "serial fabulist".
"Leopold, you may recall, is the freelance reporter who was caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article, and had his own memoir cancelled because of concerns of the accuracy of quotations."
"But the book was not to be"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was never "caught making stuff up in a 2002 Salon.com article"
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold's book was not only published but was on Los Angeles Times Bestseller List at the time this article was published. While it is certainly fair to note that Mr. Leopold’s first publisher did not publish Mr. Leopold’s book, it is not acceptable to defame Mr. Leopold with the false claim that his book was cancelled because of concerns over accuracy or to imply, as the article does, that the book was not to be, and was never published.
"Leopold’s latest addition to his application for membership in the Stephen Glass school of journalism came on May 12 of this year..."
Stephen Glass is know for being an admitted liar and fabricator of stories. The clear implication is that Mr. Leopold is also a fabricator is stories. Mr. Leopold is not a fabricator of stories.
After all this certainty comes Leopold's latest version of the story, published yesterday, where he writes that he based his original article "on single source information and general background information obtained from experts. The conclusions we arrive at should be considered carefully, but not taken as statements of fact, per se."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
Leopold says that he knows "for certain" that there exists a federal indictment called "06 cr 128" which he refers to as "(Sealed vs. Sealed)" since neither party's name is on the document. He also knows that this indictment "was returned by the same grand jury that has been hearing matters related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Mr. Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
So much for what Leopold knows. Apparently, Leopold is a very religious man, because he "believes" quite a bit about the alleged indictment. He believes that it "is directly related to the Fitzgerald/Plame investigation. That's based on a single credible source." He goes on to list several other things he "believes" to be true, all fed to him by, in his words, the "same single credible source."
The true facts are that Paul McLeary falsely puts these quoted words in Jason Leopold’s mouth making it appear that Mr. Leopold’s work is improperly sourced and otherwise unreliable. These words were never stated or written by Mr. Leopold, but rather appeared under a byline by Mark Ash, the Executive Director of Truthout.
"Salon removed Leopold's August 29, 2002 story about Enron from its site after it was discovered that he plagiarized parts from the Financial Times and was unable to provide a copy of an email that was critical to the piece."
The true facts are that Mr. Leopold was able, and did in fact; provide the aforementioned email to Salon.com. Salon’s concern had to do with authenticating the email.
The above statements are unprivileged and defamatory per se, in that they tend directly to injure Mr. Leopold in that they are an unprivileged and expose Mr. Leopold to "to hatred, contempt, ridicule, or obloquy, or which causes him to be shunned or avoided, or which has a tendency to injure him in his occupation" Cal. Civ. Code § 45.
Surprisingly, Mr. Leopold was never contacted for comment on this article. Quotes were wrongly attributed to Mr. Leopold and then used by the author to bolster the attack on Mr. Leopold’s credibility. A basic investigation into Mr. Leopold reveals that his book was published and is available. Further, Mr. Leopold’s book is cited with a link on every story he writes for Truthout, including the ones Paul McLeary cites in his article. McLeary ignores those facts and gives the impression to CJR's readers that Mr. Leopold's book was never published and is not available.
The article has caused damage to Mr. Leopold and continues to cause him damage. Mr. Leopold is currently promoting his book. This article is harming his ability to secure interviews and otherwise harming him professionally. We demand that you immediately take steps to mitigate the damage your defamatory actions are causing.
Please contact me at your earliest convenience to discuss the matter.
Sincerely, David J. Brown Attorney at Law Egerman & Brown, LLC
Posted by albenotruth on Sat 14 Feb 2009 at 09:18 PM
You know Jason, every time you print that letter it gets more convincing. When you first posted it as Howard Kurtz, that was a little far fetched, making it seem like the famed media critic lawyered on the side. The second time, posted under "Leopold Sued CJR" was a bit better, maybe a bit whiny, but at least the "source" wasn't as unbelievable. (And you do strive to make your "sources" believable, don't you?)
That last one, with the very same letter you've posted and re-posted, however, was Super convincing... what you lacked was a name on the bottom of it. I guess it was David J. Brown sockpuppeting as Howard Kurtz, not Jason Leopold.
Because we all know Jason Leopold wouldn't sockpuppet or make things up.
Posted by Oh my, that is convincing! on Mon 6 Apr 2009 at 08:11 AM