Too Big to Fail: The Inside Story of How Wall Street and Washington Fought to Save the Financial System—and Themselves
By Andrew Ross Sorkin | Viking | 600 pages, $32.95
“I must admit,” Sorkin wrote us this morning, “I was completely bowled over by the turnout. It was quite incredible to reassemble so many characters from the book in one room all together. For a book that shows so many of these characters with their warts and all in the midst of the greatest panic of their lives, I am tremendously grateful that they came out to support me.”— “Andrew Ross Sorkin’s Book Party Was Filled With CEOs, Warts and All,” New York magazine’s Daily Intel blog, an item on a book party for Too Big To Fail at the Monkey Bar, October 21, 2009
Andrew Ross Sorkin’s Too Big To Fail is an extraordinary work of reportage by a once-in-a-generation journalist. It is also something else: an example of access journalism par excellence. That’s not a flaw, necessarily, but it is a fact that colors nearly every paragraph of this sprawling book. As such, Too Big To Fail demonstrates both the potential and the limits of the form.
Anyone who finds TBTF less than satisfying as a work of nonfiction, and I’m among them, must first acknowledge that this book places vast amounts of new information into the public record, information that probably only Sorkin could have gathered in such quantity. When it comes to fact-gathering virtuosity, TBTF is in a class by itself. What’s more, the facts have held up. What more do you want from a journalist? It is a fair question.
A thirty-two-year-old New York Times columnist and editor, Sorkin burst onto the scene earlier in the decade via a series of blockbuster scoops on mergers and acquisitions. He followed that up with the creation of DealBook, a franchise within a franchise at the Times that breaks and aggregates financial news, amassing more than 200,000 loyal e-mail subscribers and many more regular readers.
For his first book, Sorkin and his team interviewed more than two hundred people, gathering anecdotes on most of the key players in the financial crisis: Paulson, Bernanke, Geithner, Fuld, Blankfein, Dimon (especially Dimon), and many more. The scenes are woven deftly together with previously reported and properly attributed material to form a streamlined chronology of the months leading up to Lehman’s failure and AIG’s rescue, as viewed from the executive suite. An instant best-seller, Sorkin’s is the breakout book of the crisis. Early reviews in the financial press start at euphoric and go up from there. And there’s a reason for that.
Without TBTF there would be many things we did not know. Who, for example, leaked the June 4, 2008, story about Lehman’s last-ditch talks with a Korean government entity, imperiling a deal that could have been a critical lifeline? (Sorkin says Lehman brass believe it was Erin Callan, the company’s CFO.) What does financial Armageddon look like? (Sorkin provides a deadly snapshot: “The Lehman board had already begun its meeting when the bankruptcy lawyers from Weil Gotshal, towing wheeled suitcases stuffed with documents, finally arrived.”) And what did Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein say during a critical meeting at the New York Fed, on the very day the government decided to bail out AIG, sending billions of dollars to his own company? (“So, when is the money going to be paid out?”)
(Disclosure time: Goldman gave the business-press section I run at the Columbia Journalism Review, known as The Audit, $25,000 last year. Sorkin was a big help in creating The Audit as one of several advisers to cjr before I arrived in the spring of 2007, and has since attended private breakfasts of funders and journalists hosted by The Audit to discuss journalism and financial issues. End of disclosure. Void where prohibited. See box top for details.)
Whine whine whine. Columbia keeps turning out mediocre reporters, and Starkman keeps picking nits and finding fault with everything. If I want sanctimony I'll go to church.
#1 Posted by L. Lloyd Samuels, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 03:55 PM
A "once-in-a-generation journalist"?
I think I just threw up a little.
#2 Posted by Richard, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:19 PM
At least it's better than Gasparino's book: no anecdotes, no analysis, only wind.
#3 Posted by Steve Klein, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:30 PM
No news in the book? I should hope not. The author writes for a daily newspaper, you know. If he knows any news, that is where it should be found.
#4 Posted by Harry Eagar, CJR on Thu 11 Mar 2010 at 04:42 PM
Another inside story begins to sound like a yawn...The political undercurrents are what's important to grasp now and how it relates to rubbish talk like "to big to fail", and rubbish words like "derivatives" (yet to be clearly explained). Take pause and examine recent history, circa fascist Italy 1930's and 40',bailing out their plutocrats with public monies, arming the right and beating up the left ..all repeating itself during Seattle 1999 and the WTO; or the Greens, G20 in Pennsylvania. Police riot gear on full display, in use, shows to all of us what IS ongoing and what IS perfectly clear, government riot control against a fed up nation!.
#5 Posted by elmer fuddieee, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 12:45 AM
This review captures what I've been telling everyone abut TBTF. It serves up the gossip of the crisis and never gets near the bone.
#6 Posted by Michael M. Thomas, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 08:50 AM
This review reminds me of a review of a book on great hitters in baseball, that pointed how how it never talked about how the uniforms were made.
#7 Posted by J Scott Brown, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 10:25 AM
I read TBTF with great interest and anticipation, and agree 100% with this assessment. It's great read. Great job of reporting. But I didn't feel after 600 pages that it added much to our understanding of the causes of the crisis, or its significance.
#8 Posted by Marc Gunther, CJR on Fri 12 Mar 2010 at 02:15 PM
It's a great fictional narrative that plays well with our modern times. Great journalism? Far from it. Sorkin is an insider and he shows why. With recent revelations about Leahman's repo transactions, Sorkin's book was exposed for what it is--a gloss over of the biggest heist in American financial hsitory. He made Fuld look like an angel. I understand the reasoning. As a journalist he wants to maintain his access to these people. Pragmatic? Sure. Cynical? Absolutely. But this is not journalism. I don't know what values/Ethics you teach at Columbia.
#9 Posted by Martin dugard, CJR on Sun 14 Mar 2010 at 12:30 PM
Richard, you are right about the nausea, I got it too.
Great review of a book that follows the crumbs dribbled by those who lead and feed the GFC. I suspect Sorkin is not up to a sequel, highlighting the options to avoid this tendency of Wall St Institutions to drive the economy off the top of the cliff with the Leeming like acquiescence of Regulators and Politicians. The end result of course is that the non participants in this game of fraud are the ones to suffer.
#10 Posted by Anechidna, CJR on Fri 19 Mar 2010 at 05:00 PM
I don't think it is fair criticism to complain that Sorkin wrote the wrong book. No one book could cover both the events of mid-to-late 2008 and get into depth about root causes. That would be 2000-pager that ordinary human beings couldn't even lift, let alone read.
If he got facts wrong, if he misrepresented reality, then have at it. But unless you are his assignment editor, his choice of topics is his call not yours.
#11 Posted by garhighway, CJR on Mon 23 Aug 2010 at 10:18 AM