I’ve been wondering when the taxation solution would pop up in the financial press regarding the record bonuses Wall Street is set to pay out this year.
Today it does—in The Wall Street Journal’s Heard on the Street column, of all places.
Simon Nixon writes:
This year’s bank profits are windfalls in the purest sense. They aren’t the due rewards for exceptional skill but gifts from taxpayers.
Anybody care to argue that one? You’ll have to deal with this:
Many banks are earning huge, risk-free profits borrowing from central banks at ultralow interest rates and lending back to governments at much-higher rates. If this giant, hidden subsidy was being used to support new lending, fair enough. Instead, it looks destined for bankers’ pockets.
Remarkably, Nixon calls for a windfall-profits tax on bonuses as one solution, ending with this conclusion:
If banks can’t be trusted to do the right thing and exercise self-restraint, governments shouldn’t be afraid to help.
Let’s be clear: This isn’t the WSJ editorial page. But it ain’t The Nation, either. It’s obvious the banks have overplayed their hand these last six months and there’s a backlash brewing, even in what should ostensibly be friendly quarters.





Recent Comments
-
Fay33Pate on
Looking for Haiti’s Lost, Online
(1)
-
Mark Dawson on
"Rejuvenating American Journalism"
(7)
-
new era hats on
The Economy Today: Recession Sickness
(6)
-
nasharti on
Tax Talk
(2)
-
Fur on
Trudy Lieberman Campaign Desk Archive
(4)
-
Donald I on
The Education of Herb And Marion Sandler
(9)
-
danny bloom on
Newser, The Fly on the Wall, and Aggregation
(2)
-
Linda Hughes on
Update on Medicare Advantage Plans
(31)
More