It’s, ahem, interesting to see Hero Harry Markopolos’s take on Murdoch as the Journal takeover was proceeding. This in an email to reporter John Wilke (warning: big PDF):
Murdoch would be poison for the paper. As far as editorial freedom, the WSJ’s editorials are so bad right now I actually think Murdoch could only improve them. It’s the WSJ’s unsurpassed content outside of those whack-job editorials that I worry about. WSJ reporters are the world’s best business reporters bar none. If the WSJ falls prey to Murdoch, that’ll leave only the FT and the Economist as world-class repositories for serious, insightful financial journalism. You guys really need to start slamming Murdoch on the front pages.
And as a reporter there at the time, I can tell you nine out of ten news staffers agreed with every word of that.





Recent Comments
-
Thimbles on
Well, It May Deserve an Award in Something
(79)
-
James on
Not For All the News in China, Part I
(7)
-
Michele Travierso on
Everybody's On Edge
(4)
-
Anna Haynes on
Unscientific America Meets Denialism
(5)
-
JSF on
Strike a Pose—Rogue (Rogue, Rogue…)
(80)
-
Gary Brown on
ACORN's Family Tree
(24)
-
Belinda Gomez on
The Blade’s Last Cut
(1)
-
Joel Current on
What's a News Brief Worth?
(2)
More