The Dallas Morning News and NPR report that homeowners associations are foreclosing on members for missing their monthly dues, noting the infuriating story of a soldier in Texas who got his house sold out from under him while he was in Iraq.
It’s a perfect anecdote: The man’s depressed wife neglected to pay two HOA payments for less than a thousand dollars total and the association foreclosed on the couple, selling their $300,000 house for $3,500 in an auction.
NPR does the better job of turning this single anecdote into a broader story. It does that by looking at how the extremely powerful HOAs have extraordinary powers:
And in 33 states, an HOA does not need to go before a judge to collect on the liens.
It’s called nonjudicial foreclosure, and in practice it means a house can be sold on the courthouse steps with no judge or arbitrator involved. In Texas the process period is a mere 27 days — the shortest of any state.
You’ve got to be kidding me.
And it looks briefly at HOA management companies, which an attorney says “have been making millions off homeowners through this foreclosure process.”
“We’re having literally thousands of lawsuits filed over very small amounts of money,” Kahne says. “And those very small amounts of money rapidly become large amounts of money when the association attorneys add their bills.”
The only quibble I have here is that the two stories only presents the same single anecdote—one that was used in a short piece in Mother Jones a month ago. A couple of additional examples would have taken its already terrific story to the next level. The soldier’s story is apparently being pushed by a publicist. That’s fine to report on it—it’s a great story—but find other examples to bolster the case.
Sounds like a good project for some ambitious reporter out there, and it shouldn’t be hard to find. NPR actually has the data, reporting that (emphasis mine):
With the recession, foreclosure filings for delinquent HOA assessments in Texas have increased from about 1 percent of all home foreclosures to more than 10 percent currently, according to the industry.
That’s a this-is-news statistic—one that shows there are many more stories to be mined here. The Morning News has the on-the-ground data for the Metroplex:
For the first seven months of this year, homeowners associations in Dallas, Tarrant, Denton and Collin counties posted 1,625 properties for foreclosure, according to George Roddy of Foreclosure Listing Service. Associations can foreclose on a property for any rule violation, but typically it’s for not paying dues.
One thing to look at is the potential for corruption. You have extremely powerful HOAs that can foreclose on houses “with no judge or arbitrator involved,” which necessarily raises serious questions about due process. In the case NPR mentions, the HOA auctioned a $300,000 house for $3,500.
That certainly ought to raise eyebrows. The buyer turned around and flipped it for a 3700 percent profit. NPR says:
There have been complaints that some members of HOA boards have bought HOA-foreclosed properties for a pittance, and then sold them for a hefty profit.
Let’s see some more stories on those complaints.

I can only feel so sorry for these people. For one thing, when you agree to join a HOA, you are surrendering all rights to your property and behavior. Secondly, the only reason people join them is to make sure they don't have Jews, homos, or negros in their neighborhood.
#1 Posted by dwindle, CJR on Thu 1 Jul 2010 at 12:58 PM
Not true, dwindle.Your remark was just ignorant. In Texas, in lieu of zoning, we have HOAs. If you want to live anywhere other than in the country on a farm, you deal with an HOA. That's just how it is. Other states may be different.
#2 Posted by Sarah, CJR on Thu 1 Jul 2010 at 02:21 PM
This story has been fairly ubiquitous lately, and for good reason.
What happened to this soldier is absolutely infuriating, and there is no justification for such an act. I sincerely hope he and his family receive justice for the crime that has been committed against them.
Unfortunately in every business, there are good and bad people and companies representing it. In the case of HOA management, it seems that all we hear about are the bad examples, thus fueling the fire that Americans feel toward HOAs in general.
You are absolutely spot on about the need to find other examples. From a bigger picture perspective, stories such as this one will eventually lead to the evolution of the HOA management industry, and hopefully weed out the companies with less than reputable intentions.
Just know that not all HOA management companies have this level of greed and wrongdoing at their core. There are plenty of professional firms out there who actually help homeowners.
#3 Posted by Brian, CJR on Wed 7 Jul 2010 at 03:33 PM
This story has been fairly ubiquitous lately, and for good reason.
What happened to this soldier is absolutely infuriating, and there is no justification for such an act. I sincerely hope he and his family receive justice for the crime that has been committed against them.
Unfortunately in every business, there are good and bad people and companies representing it. In the case of HOA management, it seems that all we hear about are the bad examples, thus fueling the fire that Americans feel toward HOAs in general.
You are absolutely spot on about the need to find other examples. From a bigger picture perspective, stories such as this one will eventually lead to the evolution of the HOA management industry, and hopefully weed out the companies with less than reputable intentions.
Just know that not all HOA management companies have this level of greed and wrongdoing at their core. There are plenty of professional firms out there who actually help homeowners.
#4 Posted by Brian, CJR on Wed 7 Jul 2010 at 03:34 PM
I apologize for the double post, the first submission gave me an error message, but apparently went through anyway.
Apologies.
#5 Posted by Brian, CJR on Wed 7 Jul 2010 at 03:36 PM
I totally disagree. True, the fact that any soldier away from home fighting for our country should not have their house foreclosured on and should be protected. However, I lived in a city in the Dallas County area for over 30 years and moved to an HOA in the Denton County area because I got tired of living next to neighbors that kept their Christmas lights up all year, worked on their car in the middle of their yard, only mowed once or twice a summer, etc. I didn't mind paying HOA dues so that I could live in a community that others had to follow the same rules that I did and therefore also had to pay the same dues that I do. If you don't want to pay your dues don't move into an HOA neighborhood. There are still houses for sell in non-HOA areas that are in the city. However, most HOA's will work with you if you lose your job, etc. and can't pay your dues, you just need to call them and work out some arrangements. I doubt that all HOA's want to foreclose on your house, they want just the opposite.
#6 Posted by Drue, CJR on Fri 23 Jul 2010 at 09:52 PM
I was on an HOA board of directors of a large town home community in Maryland. Any rule violations were handled by the Architectural Review Board and any ruling could be appealed to Board of Directors. Non-payment of dues resulted in a lien slapped against the property and a financial penalty was assessed to to cover legal costs.
The elected board of directors of the these HOA's should be answerable to the members of the community at election time. Unfortunately, many homeowners do not want to get involved and very few show up at meetings. What happened at my community was that homeowners were fed up with the heavy handed board on stupid petty issues. For example, an application was required to be presented to the Architectural Review Committee for approval to put up a storm door. It had to be had to be painted the exact same color as the entry door and casing, which required sending it a body shop because it was meticulously inspected for imperfections in texture and shade. As a result, lethargic community members became activists, and there was a big turnover of the board to reasonable members at the next election. At the first meeting, members of the Architectural Review Committee were fired and new guidelines were subsequently created by new committee members. For storm doors, erecting full view storm doors later required no approval and the color could be standard white or the color of the entry door and casing.
Several years ago there was a 60 Minutes piece on an elderly woman who had her property sold because her attorney did not pay her dues for her (and the attorney was later disbarred). That indecent lead to a change in the state law forbidding that activity. Legislation should be enacted in such states to correct such abuse. Law supersedes covenants.
#7 Posted by Joe, CJR on Tue 27 Jul 2010 at 08:29 AM
10/01/2009 Opening Balance 1,705.07 1,705.07
10/31/2009 Late Fees 25.00 1,730.07 Late Fee Late Fee: 10/31/2009
10/31/2009 Late Interest 22.86 1,752.93 Late Interest Late Interest: 10/31/2009
11/11/2009 Legal Charges 93.13 1,846.06 Austin - #81545 Pre-Posting Demand Letter
11/30/2009 Check -60.00 1,786.06 114 Payment
11/30/2009 Late Fees 25.00 1,811.06 Late Fee Late Fee: 11/30/2009
11/30/2009 Late Interest 22.86 1,833.92 Late Interest Late Interest: 11/30/2009
12/17/2009 Legal Charges 315.50 2,149.42 Austin - #82521 Posting Demand Letter
12/31/2009 Late Fees 25.00 2,174.42 Late Fee Late Fee: 12/31/2009
12/31/2009 Late Interest 22.86 2,197.28 Late Interest Late Interest: 12/31/2009
01/01/2010 Assessments 180.00 2,377.28 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 01/01/2010
01/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 2,402.28 Late Fee Late Fee: 01/31/2010
01/31/2010 Late Interest 25.56 2,427.84 Late Interest Late Interest: 01/31/2010
02/05/2010 Check -100.01 2,327.83 120 Payment
02/05/2010 Legal Charges 455.89 2,783.72 Austin - #83581 Foreclosure Sale
02/28/2010 Late Fees 25.00 2,808.72 Late Fee Late Fee: 02/28/2010
02/28/2010 Late Interest 25.56 2,834.28 Late Interest Late Interest: 02/28/2010
03/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 2,859.28 Late Fee Late Fee: 03/31/2010
03/31/2010 Late Interest 25.56 2,884.84 Late Interest Late Interest: 03/31/2010
04/01/2010 Assessments 180.00 3,064.84 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 04/01/2010
04/30/2010 Check -2,800.00 264.84 3858480 Payment
04/30/2010 Miscellaneous Credit -264.84 0.00 Approved write-off Approved write-off
05/07/2010 Legal Charges 100.00 100.00 Austin - #87427 Draft Redemption Deed
07/01/2010 Assessments 180.00 280.00 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 07/01/2010
07/06/2010 Check -100.00 180.00 277 Payment
07/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 205.00 Late Fee Late Fee: 07/31/2010
07/31/2010 Late Interest 2.70 207.70 Late Interest Late Interest: 07/31/2010
08/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 232.70 Late Fee Late Fee: 08/31/2010
08/31/2010 Late Interest 2.70 235.40 Late Interest Late Interest: 08/31/2010
09/22/2010 Demand Letter 10.00 245.40 Demand Letter
09/30/2010 Late Fees 25.00 270.40 Late Fee Late Fee: 09/30/2010
09/30/2010 Late Interest 2.70 273.10 Late Interest Late Interest: 09/30/2010
10/01/2010 Assessments 180.00 453.10 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 10/01/2010
10/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 478.10 Late Fee Late Fee: 10/31/2010
10/31/2010 Late Interest 5.40 483.50 Late Interest Late Interest: 10/31/2010
11/23/2010 Legal Charges 93.13 576.63 Austin - #95598 Attorney Demand Letter
11/30/2010 Late Fees 25.00 601.63 Late Fee Late Fee: 11/30/2010
11/30/2010 Late Interest 5.40 607.03 Late Interest Late Interest: 11/30/2010
12/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 632.03 Late Fee Late Fee: 12/31/2010
If its not a money making sceem, why charge 10% "Late Interest"? This is how my recent bill looks. The colums are: Trans Date, Transaction, Charges, Payments, Balance, Date Billed, Reference, and Comments...
12/31/2010 Late Interest 5.40 637.43 Late Interest Late Interest: 12/31/2010
01/01/2011 Assessments 180.00 817.43 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 01/01/2011
01/31/2011 Late Fees 25.00 842.43 Late Fee Late Fee: 01/31/2011
01/31/2011 Late Interest 8.10 850.53 Late Interest Late Interest: 01/31/2011
02/17/2011 Legal Charges 250.50 1,101.03 Austin - #98097 Notice of Assessment Lien
02/28/2011 Late Fees 25.00 1,126.03 Late Fee Late Fee: 02/28/2011
02/28/2011 Late Interest 8.10 1,134.13 Late Interest Late Interest: 02/28/2011
#8 Posted by IFEELYourPAIN, CJR on Fri 18 Mar 2011 at 08:52 PM
Bill From HOA Attry.
If its NOT a money making sceem, why charge 10% "Late Interest"? This is how my recent bill looks. The colums are: Trans Date, Transaction, Charges, Payments, Balance, Date Billed, Reference, and Comments...
10/01/2009 Opening Balance 1,705.07 1,705.07
10/31/2009 Late Fees 25.00 1,730.07 Late Fee Late Fee: 10/31/2009
10/31/2009 Late Interest 22.86 1,752.93 Late Interest Late Interest: 10/31/2009
11/11/2009 Legal Charges 93.13 1,846.06 Austin - #81545 Pre-Posting Demand Letter
11/30/2009 Check -60.00 1,786.06 114 Payment
11/30/2009 Late Fees 25.00 1,811.06 Late Fee Late Fee: 11/30/2009
11/30/2009 Late Interest 22.86 1,833.92 Late Interest Late Interest: 11/30/2009
12/17/2009 Legal Charges 315.50 2,149.42 Austin - #82521 Posting Demand Letter
12/31/2009 Late Fees 25.00 2,174.42 Late Fee Late Fee: 12/31/2009
12/31/2009 Late Interest 22.86 2,197.28 Late Interest Late Interest: 12/31/2009
01/01/2010 Assessments 180.00 2,377.28 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 01/01/2010
01/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 2,402.28 Late Fee Late Fee: 01/31/2010
01/31/2010 Late Interest 25.56 2,427.84 Late Interest Late Interest: 01/31/2010
02/05/2010 Check -100.01 2,327.83 120 Payment
02/05/2010 Legal Charges 455.89 2,783.72 Austin - #83581 Foreclosure Sale
02/28/2010 Late Fees 25.00 2,808.72 Late Fee Late Fee: 02/28/2010
02/28/2010 Late Interest 25.56 2,834.28 Late Interest Late Interest: 02/28/2010
03/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 2,859.28 Late Fee Late Fee: 03/31/2010
03/31/2010 Late Interest 25.56 2,884.84 Late Interest Late Interest: 03/31/2010
04/01/2010 Assessments 180.00 3,064.84 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 04/01/2010
04/30/2010 Check -2,800.00 264.84 3858480 Payment
04/30/2010 Miscellaneous Credit -264.84 0.00 Approved write-off Approved write-off
05/07/2010 Legal Charges 100.00 100.00 Austin - #87427 Draft Redemption Deed
07/01/2010 Assessments 180.00 280.00 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 07/01/2010
07/06/2010 Check -100.00 180.00 277 Payment
07/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 205.00 Late Fee Late Fee: 07/31/2010
07/31/2010 Late Interest 2.70 207.70 Late Interest Late Interest: 07/31/2010
08/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 232.70 Late Fee Late Fee: 08/31/2010
08/31/2010 Late Interest 2.70 235.40 Late Interest Late Interest: 08/31/2010
09/22/2010 Demand Letter 10.00 245.40 Demand Letter
09/30/2010 Late Fees 25.00 270.40 Late Fee Late Fee: 09/30/2010
09/30/2010 Late Interest 2.70 273.10 Late Interest Late Interest: 09/30/2010
10/01/2010 Assessments 180.00 453.10 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 10/01/2010
10/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 478.10 Late Fee Late Fee: 10/31/2010
10/31/2010 Late Interest 5.40 483.50 Late Interest Late Interest: 10/31/2010
11/23/2010 Legal Charges 93.13 576.63 Austin - #95598 Attorney Demand Letter
11/30/2010 Late Fees 25.00 601.63 Late Fee Late Fee: 11/30/2010
11/30/2010 Late Interest 5.40 607.03 Late Interest Late Interest: 11/30/2010
12/31/2010 Late Fees 25.00 632.03 Late Fee Late Fee: 12/31/2010
12/31/2010 Late Interest 5.40 637.43 Late Interest Late Interest: 12/31/2010
01/01/2011 Assessments 180.00 817.43 Quarterly Charges Recurring Charges: 01/01/2011
01/31/2011 Late Fees 25.00 842.43 Late Fee Late Fee: 01/31/2011
01/31/2011 Late Interest 8.10 850.53 Late Interest Late Interest: 01/31/2011
02/17/2011 Legal Charges 250.50 1,101.03 Austin - #98097 Notice of Assessment Lien
02/28/2011 Late Fees 25.00 1,126.03 Late Fee Late Fee: 02/28/2011
02/28/2011 Late Interest 8.10 1,134.13 Late Interest Late Interest: 02/28/2011
#9 Posted by IFEELYourPAIN, CJR on Fri 18 Mar 2011 at 08:58 PM