Felix Salmon is right: What’s a New York Times business columnist doing in an ad for a company that uses misleading tactics to lure customers into a “free” service that actually costs money?
More to the point: What’s a New York Times business columnist doing in an ad at all?
Ben Stein, who writes the “Everybody’s Business” column on Sundays, is, of course, a jack of all trades. He’s had his own game show, written speeches for Nixon, and, most classically, was the droning teacher in Ferris Bueller’s Day Off.
Here’s the Times’s bug on Stein, which runs at the bottom of his columns: “Ben Stein is a lawyer, writer, actor and economist.”
If the Times for some reason allows him to continue to pen his column, the it had better add “paid shill for anti-consumer corporations” to the list.
It’s worth quoting Salmon at length here:
A few points are worth noting here. First, the score itself is not very useful to consumers. What’s useful is the report — if there’s an error on the report, then the consumer can try to rectify it. Secondly, and much more importantly, if you want a free credit report, there’s only one place to go: annualcreditreport.com. That’s the place where the big three credit-rating agencies will give you a genuinely free copy of your credit report once a year, as required by federal law.
You won’t be surprised to hear that freescore.com is not free: in order to get any information out of them at all, you have to authorize them to charge you a $29.95 monthly fee. They even extract a dollar out of you up front, just to make sure that money is there.
Stein, here, has become a predatory bait-and-switch merchant, dangling a “free” credit report in front of people so that he can sock them with a massive monthly fee for, essentially, doing nothing at all. Naturally, the people who take him up on this offer will be those who can least afford it.
That’s all dead on and it really looks bad for The New York Times.
I can tell you I’ve gone looking for the real free credit report before and gotten halfway into one of these freescore.com type things before realizing what it was. It’s a predatory tactic, as Salmon rightly calls it, to part people trying to check their credit scores from their money, and enough people do it to allow them to put all these annoying ads up.
I’d love to see how much of freescore.com’s business is made up of one-month-only customers, who get slapped with the $29.95 fee and cancel immediately. I mean, who wants or needs to pay $30 a month for a credit-watch service?
The practice is so shady, it’s being regulated in the new credit-card bill: These folks will have to disclose in ads that the only place to actually get a free credit report is at annualcreditreport.com. This is exactly what the Consumer Financial Protection Agency is supposed to be for.
I got on CNBC’s Rick Santelli a bit last week for appearing at a “get rich trading” seminar. But that’s nothing compared to this Stein ad.
I have questions out to the Times on whether it’s kosher for regular columnists to appear in ads and especially ones for companies like these. I’ll update this post with its response when I hear back.

I'm going to have to go home and look it up (if I can find the source), but I would swear that freecreditreport.com is where I got my three FREE credit reports. Have they changed their offerings, I wonder? Maybe I'm misremembering, but I didn't sign up for any service or pay anything.
I agree with the article, however, that the Times (or Stein) should have disclosed the relationship.
#1 Posted by msmolly, CJR on Fri 17 Jul 2009 at 10:27 AM
That’s almost as outrageous as a self appointed civil rights “leader” hawking for a payday loan company that targets minority customers … but he’s black and a democrat so I suppose the outrage meter gets set a bit higher.
#2 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Fri 17 Jul 2009 at 11:20 AM
More finicky criticism by CJR of one of The Times' 'conservative' contributors, while the liblabs like Herbert and Krugman continue to be free of fact-checking. Since Krugman has in the past been denounced by the paper's own ombudsman for massaging his statistics for partisan ends, I suspect CJR is looking out for me when it comes to journalistic misdeeds by conservative misdeeds, but not looking out for me when it comes to liberal ones.
Oh, right. Victor Navasky in Chairman of CJR. I keep forgetting, and holding CJR to a high standard of toughness.
#3 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Fri 17 Jul 2009 at 12:23 PM
Mark, look at the bright side: at least Aler Hiss isnt in the news anymore. Navasky's pet project would have consumed this site if his trial was held today.
#4 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Fri 17 Jul 2009 at 12:33 PM
Hey, what does Al Sharpton have to do with anything? Is he doing business journalism now?
Next time I see Paul Krugman in a LoanMax ad, I'll be the first one to screech.
#5 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Fri 17 Jul 2009 at 01:48 PM
Op-Ed columnist Paul Krugman has the disturbing habit of shaping, slicing and selectively citing numbers in a fashion that pleases his acolytes but leaves him open to substantive assaults -Daniel Okrent
I know .... that's "Nobel Lauriat", Paul Krugman we are talking and there are different standards for our hero’s and some Reich wing Nixon hack. I mean its not like Krugman used to do work for Enron or anything …. oh shit, that’s right, forgot about that one.
And on that note, I eagerly await your next slime piece on Santelli.
#6 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Fri 17 Jul 2009 at 02:08 PM
Again, Mike,
Krugman worked for Enron before he was a columnist for the Times. He quit that when he signed up with the paper. As far as I can tell, he disclosed his prior relationship when it came up in his columns. I've got no problem with that.
Also, I'm more than happy to call Krugman out for misleading (or "selective citing"), as I did three weeks ago here.
As I say to all readers, if you see something--good or bad--that needs to be spotlighted, lemme know. You see Krugman fudging, drop me a line.
#7 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Fri 17 Jul 2009 at 03:25 PM
Duh, Ryan, can't you see that two wrongs make a right?
Other people are pitching for sleazy businesses, so therefore when Ben Stein and Rick Santelli pitch for sleazy businesses, they aren't doing anything wrong. Because, after all, other people are doing it.
Airtight logic, no?
#8 Posted by Hardrada, CJR on Fri 17 Jul 2009 at 05:45 PM
I signed up for the wrong credit report too! I have never been fooled by a scam or spam website before, never forwarded something that was on Snopes.com... these guys are ultra-tricky.
#9 Posted by Noumenon, CJR on Sat 18 Jul 2009 at 02:13 AM
Mike H., lol, thanks. I'm sorry, but if CJR's chairman is as reality-challenged as Victor Navasky, it calls the enterprise into question.
Ryan, thanks for the link and the offer. This isn't Krugman . . . but, in the same vein, did anyone at CJR notice Justice Ginsburg's comment about abortion rights being motivated by the desire to keep 'certain populations' from growing, and Dahlia Lithwick's predictable failure to ask Ginsburg just which populations she was referring to?
#10 Posted by Mark Richard, CJR on Mon 20 Jul 2009 at 01:54 PM
Chittum someone should get on you for fabricating stories. Where did you come up with the bull Santelli was at a get rich seminar?Santelli was at a education bootcamp for kids.Were all waiting to read how your information became sooo confused on this matter! Who really cares what Columbia Review writes about other journalist when they are willing to fabricate their own stories. Ryan is nothing but a liar using Santelli's name to tag pieces no one would otherwise read!~
#11 Posted by Lynne, CJR on Wed 22 Jul 2009 at 12:15 AM
Well, Lynne,
I came up with it from a website hawking a get-rich seminar with video of Santelli and others at the seminar.
You might want to go talk to CNBC about how they felt about this. Since I'm pretty sure you won't, I'll repeat for you the quote from a CNBC spokesman:
"“Larry Levin is in the process of removing any mention of Rick’s appearance or his likeness from his website nor will he be selling DVD’s that contains footage of Rick.”
http://www.cjr.org/the_audit/cnbcs_santelli.php
#12 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Wed 22 Jul 2009 at 10:02 AM
MSMolly - freeCreditreport.com is not free. check your credit card statements for monthly charges labeled "Triple Advantage." That's right - they give you a free credit report alright, and it comes with a nice monthly fee for a service you don't even know you're signing up for.
#13 Posted by Beatrix, CJR on Fri 7 Aug 2009 at 01:00 PM
I agree as well in the article!
Todd DiRoberto
http://www.newsguide.us/art-entertainment/movies/Todd-DiRoberto-of-American-Satellite-Hosts-Independence-Day-Charity-Event-for-Operation-Bigs/
#14 Posted by amsatpro, CJR on Fri 7 Aug 2009 at 05:09 PM
Halfway into filling out the form for freescore i balked because i decided i was not going to give my ss# and quickly closed the freecsore page. I mean I did not even finish the form, so it shows that the only reason this site is in bunisses is to get your cc#, everything is meaningless.
What i am saying is that this company cannot give me my credit score, because they do not pocess my ss#. My total loss 30.99 + 27.00 overdraft fee.
Is there a number we can collectivly call to get our money back, bbb govener of the state where the company is located?
how can we use the power of the people.
#15 Posted by JIMMANNN, CJR on Sun 11 Oct 2009 at 12:56 PM
This Ben Stein thing really has me steaming. WHAT is wrong with this Guy. He has gone from an honest money man that people respected. To a senile old f--k that nobody trusts, or even likes for that matter. How sad. Ben your just a two bit, low life pi-p.
#16 Posted by Gary Keeter, CJR on Fri 26 Mar 2010 at 12:53 AM
A lot of specialists tell that home loans help people to live the way they want, just because they can feel free to buy needed things. Furthermore, a lot of banks present consolidation loan for all people.
#17 Posted by Mariana25JORDAN, CJR on Fri 16 Sep 2011 at 10:06 PM