Rick Santelli continues to make a fool of himself, touring the media to defend his call for a “tea party” over the homeowner bailout.
I’d be inclined to let this dog of a discussion bark itself out, especially since Santelli chose to carry it to the paranoid ghettos occupied by the likes of G. Gordon Liddy.
But this is too much.
Not content with his soon-to-be-expired fifteen minutes of fame, Santelli went on Liddy’s radio show and complained that the White House was threatening him and/or his family, somehow.
SANTELLI: He started that press conference saying, “I don’t know where he lives, I don’t know where his house is.” This is the Press Secretary of the White House. Is that the kind of thing we want? Is that —
LIDDY: It’s a veiled threat.
SANTELLI: It really is. […] I don’t really want to be a spokesman, but I really am very proud of a) the response I’m getting, which is overwhelmingly positive, and b) discourse, that is debate. That if the pressure and the heat I’m taking from the White House – the fact my kids are nervous to go to school – I can take that, okay.
Now, Liddy knows about threats from the White House, having plotted to assassinate columnist Jack Anderson, and he knows about other kinds, having encouraged listeners to shoot ATF agents in the head (“Head shots, head shots…. Kill the sons of bitches”), but the idea that the White House press secretary “threatened” Santelli is nuts, and irresponsible.
Here’s that “threat” from press secretary Robert Gibbs:
“I’ve watched Mr. Santelli on cable the past 24 hours or so. I’m not entirely sure where Mr. Santelli lives or in what house he lives but the American people are struggling every day to meet their mortgages, stay in their jobs, pay their bills, send their kids to school.”
Poorly phrased, maybe, but Gibbs is clearly saying that Santelli is out of touch with regular people. A fair point, considering that Santelli thinks traders on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange represent a “cross-section of America” and that people who can’t pay their mortgage are “losers.”
And here’s a question: Why is a CNBC editor going on a show with a convicted felon on the outer fringes of American public discourse?
But the larger point is this: Santelli’s outburst, whether spontaneous or staged, is one thing. For NBC cynically to ride this tiger of fear and misguided outrage is something else entirely. Its producers and anchors encouraged Santelli during his blowup, and now NBC’s networks have promoed the hell out of it (“Rick’s Revolution”, “Rebel Yell”, including leading the NBC Nightly News With Brian Williams with it on Thursday.
And now, on Liddy’s show, Santelli is completely off the reservation. NBC/CNBC only has itself to blame.
Whatever the network’s calculations, this is a low point for the peacock. Playing with your credibility may give you a short-term gain, but it’s a long-term drain.

With all due respect, what's with the rope you're laying out for Santelli? TV talking heads have been saying controversial, absurd and untrue things for years ... scratch that .. decades. How is this new?
I'm really puzzled why you're so vitriolic about this, unless it's that it's a conservative sounding off about a liberal president? Does freedom of thought and press run only in one direction now? I need to see if I got that memo ...
Nope. Never got it.
#1 Posted by Mike, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 03:44 PM
Santelli thinks traders on the floor of the Chicago Mercantile Exchange represent a “cross-section of America” and that people who can’t pay their mortgage are “losers.”
And there you have it Mr Chittum, you hit the nail right on the head. The Whitehouse is desperate to frame this debate in terms of class and naturally the upper class has got to be not only the sole perpetrator of this mess but also the ones most resistant to the “solutions”. After all, it will be much hears for team Obama and his political hacks to denigrate some rich “wall street” types than say a plumber from Ohio.
After all, the Whitehouse doesn’t want people to hear inconvenient truths like 93% of all mortgage holders are making their payments on time and will have to help out the 7%, located primarily in California, Nevada, Michigan, Florida and Arizona (how did those states vote by the way?) who want to treat the government like personal ATM machines.
I know too many people who are right there with Santelli on this one. We are tired of being the personal piggy bank of every idiot who bought a house they couldn’t afford under terms they didn’t understand.
This country is comprised of people in the wagon, and those pulling it; Obama got elected by telling those riding the wagon that he was going to make the pullers to go faster and carry a bigger load. Now that he’s breaking out the whip to get us to speed up, we start to say no.
Chittum hates the message, so he is going to savage the messenger, this being his third I hate Santelli article in the past week.
#2 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 04:59 PM
Santelli is RIGHT! The whole country understands what is going on. The Obama machine just doesn't like to hear it coming back to them. We're all supposed to go along with the Socialist crap coming out of the white House. Kind of like the Emporer's New Clothes!
Robert Gibbs is a Chicago PR HACK who has no class, wit or even any skill or crededtials to be the Presidential Press Secretay. He is there as typical 'Chicago Political Machine' payback from Obama, just like the other Daley toadies, Emanuel, who is Obama's Chief of Staff and Presidential Advisor, David Axelrod, another of Daley's PR tribe. They are all perveors of Obama Koolaid....the Propaganda Office of the President...just like little modern day 'Goerbels'. They know that if you tell a lie enough times, it becomes the truth.
#3 Posted by g. webb, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 05:02 PM
Santelli said nothing that wasn't true. I also feel better about him than others. Santelli spoke out against a policy. The attacks by Gibbs and Chittum are personal and directed at Santelli. Who gets my respect? Santelli, of course.
#4 Posted by R. Moorman, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 08:13 PM
I'm in Ryan's corner on this. Santelli's cynical rage is not only a short-term ratings winner for CNBC it's what we Australians refer to as "dog whistle" politics.
Santelli knows that blaming the "losers" (like blaming the victims of an arsonist) is going to strike a chord with conservatives.
He's dog whistling the reaction (as per the comments above my post here) and stirring up a moral panic.
Not surprising given his background, but shameful of CNBC to be milking this stuff as if it were "news" and as if it were somehow an accurate statement to make.
Santelli is a disgrace, IMHO he should be sacked, or at least reined in.
#5 Posted by Ehtical Martini, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 08:44 PM
Ryan,
you couldn't be more wrong about this. Please see the minta garcia video; the bus driver who bought an 800k house and then went on CNN yesterday to whine about that it was only worth 675 million and she couldn't make the mortgage payments. And also as a guy who got his start on the trading floor, let me tell you most of them are 2nd or 3rd generation offspring of immigrant parents, grandparents etc. They, like myself, were attracted to the trading floor because someone could make it there even though they had no connections. You are wrong to assume that people do not connect with Santelli and you really are beginning to sound silly.
#6 Posted by danmcglinchey, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 09:09 PM
Ryan,
you couldn't be more wrong about this. Please see the minta garcia video; the bus driver who bought an 800k house and then went on CNN yesterday to whine about that it was only worth 675 million and she couldn't make the mortgage payments. And also as a guy who got his start on the trading floor, let me tell you most of them are 2nd or 3rd generation offspring of immigrant parents, grandparents etc. They, like myself, were attracted to the trading floor because someone could make it there even though they had no connections. You are wrong to assume that people do not connect with Santelli and you really are beginning to sound silly.
#7 Posted by danmcglinchey, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 09:10 PM
Hi, Dan,
You're going to have to do better than argument by anecdote a la Minta Garcia. Lots of people knowingly bought too much house—I never denied that. And anyway, I can match you anecdote for anecdote, but that's kind of pointless, right?
Also, I don't "assume that people do not connect with Santelli." Clearly they do, something on Friday I blamed in part on a failure of the press to report and present the root causes of the crisis.
I said (in a previous post) that Santelli was out of touch for saying a traders represent a cross-section of America. I've been on trading floors, I've known traders. Second or third generation or whatever, they're not a cross-section of America.
#8 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 10:50 PM
this sort of pseudo populism (pseudo because the rage is coming from the highly paid, cheerled by the even more highly paid, and blaming the people who really were, and continue to be, victimized by the housing bubble and its associated miscreants) has a distinctly demagogic cast. But what is so interesting is that they are pretty poor financial 'analysts" (no news there, after all, it is CNBC) if they don't get that the housing meltdown has brought the whole economy down and will continue to do so if not remedied. As usual, short term (ratings) gain...
ps have you wondered why only neanderthals post on CJR.com? I do...
#9 Posted by brooklyn, CJR on Tue 24 Feb 2009 at 11:17 PM
Excuse me, Ryan, but where do you think traders live? where do their kids go to school, Tradersville? Tradersville High?...they live where the great cross section of america lives. You are out of touch, I think. You admit Santelli connected with a lot of people. How so if they do not identify with him, which according to your viewpoint, is impossible.
Uh, brooklyn...."only neanderthals post on CJR.com" and you post on CJR.com so ipso facto....???
#10 Posted by danmcglinchey, CJR on Wed 25 Feb 2009 at 06:35 AM
danmcglinchey.
your elementary logic is good but does not apply to the real world in either case.
The great cross section of america...hmmm. where would that be, the chicago board of trade?
and as to neartderthals, present company (that is, me) is always excepted. Did you mean to engage with what i wrote? Cuz I didn't see it...
with whom did Santelli connect? Snap polls both before & after Obama's speech were in the stratospheric-positive range. The Republicans' ratings, however, are sinking into the abyss.
I had another thought about those who post here. I wonder how may are subscribers to the magazine or in the least involved with journalism as a profession.
#11 Posted by brooklyn, CJR on Thu 26 Feb 2009 at 10:12 PM
Dear Mr Chittum, since when does freedom of speech need to bark itself out? Are you such an idoit that you cant see the truth. Is this Nazi Germany all over again. Rick Santelli gave his opinion and it was the truth. If you dont believe this then you must be one of the crooked officials that is getting his pockets lined with cash, while the rest of america bleeds. This country is in trouble and throwing money at the same crooks who wasted thiers away. Is wrong. Be a man and admit it. The American public knows this thanks to Rick Santelli, Glenn beck and other open minded Americans. God Bless them. DanO
#12 Posted by Daniel Leyerle, CJR on Fri 27 Feb 2009 at 12:58 PM
"since when does freedom of speech need to bark itself out?"
It seems to be an editorial policy at CJR. Ryan's had permission to bark on this for a couple articles already. And, they were all pretty bad.
Frankly, that could well be *why* "neanderthals" alone post on CJR. Everyone else has given up.
So, I say fire the editorial staff. Pronto. They can all go get unpaid internships at Fairness and Accuracy in Media, where they can spend some time developing their basic skills.
#13 Posted by JTFaraday, CJR on Wed 4 Mar 2009 at 08:04 AM
Look we (liberals) don't need to defend ourselves nor do we need to take any of this Russ Speak seriously. We have the Whitehouse for the next 4-8 years thus we will be given the time to prove out what we've been trying to say for the past 8 years. Sure some of what is being tried won't work, that's a given, since we have to depend on those that are bound and determined to make sure it fail so they will win on a few of them. but bottom line the truth will be told in the end and that in itself will bring about the changes needed to put us on the right path and save us from further destruction caused by the creed and irresponsible actions of those in charge over the past 8 years. we must demand accountability for all actions taken that have created this mess. The bankers, speculators, brokers, politicians,business men/women, mortgage companies, lawyers, real estate agents and brokers and the home owners that lied on their applications. Concerning the home crisis they are all responsible for this mess. Now that said we also must put home prices into perspective with real cost, using material and labor not speculation and creed. Simply put if a home cost 56,000 in materials and 32,000 in labor the home is valued at 88,000 correct with a limit of 10% profit across the board, period it is doable and profitable. And above all affordable for all. How in the hell did we allow any of these jokers to earn 100% profits and not expect this thing to blow up in our faces? With average incomes of less then 50,000 and average homes at 250,000 do the math it just don't work period.
#14 Posted by LiberalAndSmart2, CJR on Thu 5 Mar 2009 at 09:01 AM