The New York Times unloads a devastating story about the alleged New York City snowplow slowdown that became a big story in the right-wing media.
Naturally, the rabidly anti-labor Rupert Murdoch’s New York Post led the charge, helped by a Republican City Councilman, Daniel Halloran, who happens to also be a little, well, off.
But the more that investigators look into Mr. Halloran’s story, the more mystifying it becomes.
Mr. Halloran said he had been visited by two supervisors in the Transportation Department and three workers in the Sanitation Department. But the two transportation supervisors did not back up his story in interviews with investigators, according to two people briefed on the inquiries. And Mr. Halloran has steadfastly refused to reveal the names of the sanitation workers.
Here’s the background on Halloran:
He is an adherent of Theodism, a neo-pagan faith that draws from pre-Christian tribal religions of northern Europe, and he led a branch in the New York area.
My favorite bit is that last month Halloran requested a building permit for a $60,000 expansion of his house, which Wells Fargo began foreclosing on a year ago. Meantime, his wife, whom he is divorcing, has filed for bankruptcy. Oh, also: They say they’re selling the house.
But there’s a media angle here, of course. What doesn’t have one these days?
There is no question that the account has brought unusual attention to Mr. Halloran, who was a fixture on both national and local news networks for a week and a half after the blizzard.In a letter published in The Chief-Leader, which focuses on municipal labor issues, Mr. Halloran seemed to feel conflicted about all the uproar. In the letter he defended his original assertions about the slowdown, but also suggested it might have been small in scope, involving “a few bad apples.”
“My goal was never to make headlines or anger people,” he said.
So let’s look at how this thing bounced around the mostly right-wing echo chamber.
Murdoch’s Post, on December 30, started the story, naturally:
Selfish Sanitation Department bosses from the snow-slammed outer boroughs ordered their drivers to snarl the blizzard cleanup to protest budget cuts - a disastrous move that turned streets into a minefield for emergency-services vehicles, The Post has learned…
“They sent a message to the rest of the city that these particular labor issues are more important,” said City Councilman Dan Halloran (R-Queens), who was visited yesterday by a group of guilt-ridden sanitation workers who confessed the shameless plot.
Investor’s Business Daily, which makes Murdoch’s Wall Street Journal editorial page look like Marxists, said “But in casting blame, look for the union label.”
Dagen McDowell of Murdoch’s Fox Business Network, pronounced that “It illustrates to some the stranglehold that unions have over taxpayers, state and local and state and local governments.
CNN got into the act, saying:
Here is what we have just learned. CNN has learned of this possible slowdown, an intentional slowdown, by transportation and sanitation workers, a slowdown ordered from high above. CNN has learned that five workers have admitted to one city council member that their supervisors ordered a slowdown to protest impending budget cuts.
Great journalism, CNN. Not only were you apparently relying on the word of “one city council member,” and you pretended like it was you who got the scoop. Cool.
Later that afternoon, Fox News’s “Your World with Neil Cavuto” brought on Councilman Halloran to push the “evil unions” story. Meantime, CNN pushed the story all day. Randi Kaye teased it at one point like this:
And just ahead: If true, it’s an outrage, allegations that snow removal workers in New York City were slow removal workers, a deliberate slowdown. Workers say their supervisors ordered them to take it easy, leaving the city crippled, and you won’t believe why.
The next morning, Investor’s Business Daily wrote, and I am not kidding here—this lede for its editorial headlined “Bloody Snow”:
A New York City councilman has exposed that labor bosses don’t need “On the Waterfront”-style corruption to kill innocents. Sometimes all it takes is a snowstorm.
The Post got more outraged, too:
There was a method to their madness.

Well, you expect that kind of smear from the rightwing propaganda outlets. But will CNN retract its story? I'll bet not. I've never, ever seen them correct anything they've done, no matter how egregiously wrong. This is why people snicker at their claims that they do straight-up journalism; their reporters and "anchors" just run with anything the rightwing packages up for them. Why should they have any credibility after running with a story like this? It was obviously an anti-union smear job from the git-go.
I see that you didn't want to take on the Politifact fact-check of Paul Ryan. Well, I don't blame you -- it's socially unacceptable to fact-check Politifact right now, they are riding high. And few reporters have the chops to address Ryan's hyperbolic fear-mongering about the economy and the debt. Everyone always just lets it slide. Easier to take on the Ezra Kleins of the beltway, eh, @Ryan?
#1 Posted by James, CJR on Wed 26 Jan 2011 at 09:28 PM
What I find interesting is that there seems to be a positioning of unions as the cause of state collapse and that the "cadillac" health care and pensions are at the heart of the problem.
"Unions are evil. Unions are unreasonable. Look how they hold the state hostage. Bastards."
But the thing that is not talked about is how state governments and the wealthy lowered taxes without regard to deficits by using the mandated state pension contributions as general funds.
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2011/01/nj-public-pension-slugfest-reporting-omits-15-years-of-governors-stealing-from-workers.html
So yes, the state finances are in trouble and yes the state pensions are in trouble and who's fault is that?
The guy who picks up your garbage and snow plows your streets. It can't be the guy who went to Disneyworld's fault. It can't be Christie Todd Whitman's fault. If it were, would these two figures be featured everywhere lecturing everyone on the states fiscal crisises?
Public sector unions are the only labor stronghold left in America, and that's only because you can't offshore the functions of government (though there's been lots of success privatizing them, and by success I mean wasteful failures that result the more corrupt examples of crony capitalism).
There are people who hate labor. They are cheap labor conservatives.
http://www.conceptualguerilla.com/?q=node/16
And when they steer the conversation we always end up talking about the failings of unions and their pensions instead of the failings of leaders and their bad, tax cut heavy leadership.
At least in the case of Bloomberg, his administration did accept responsibility for the snow storm failings.
#2 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Wed 26 Jan 2011 at 10:38 PM
Halloran was merely the conduit for that lie, which was publicized to deflect public outrage over the Bloomberg administration's negligence in regard to the blizzard, and to give the administration plausible deniability for the story.
#3 Posted by Michael Fiorillo, CJR on Thu 27 Jan 2011 at 07:26 AM
Nice job, Chittum.
www.NewsCommonsense.com
#4 Posted by Bob Griendling, CJR on Thu 27 Jan 2011 at 09:21 PM
James, here's my thing on PolitiFact. thanks for the headsup.
#5 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Fri 28 Jan 2011 at 03:02 PM
Setting aside the fact that your "devastating" takedown consists of two anonymous sources, and overlooking the fact that you mock the councilman for refusing to name the three workers while yourself relying on unnamed sources, I can't believe you smeared the guy based on his religion.
#6 Posted by Tom T., CJR on Mon 31 Jan 2011 at 01:02 AM
The reason why the unions are "scapegoats" for states' budget problems is because they have contributed immensely to them. Just look at the trillions in unfunded liabilities for pensions. Those sweet pensions were bought with labor votes - an unholy alliance indeed.
It's frightening to see that, if someone dares speak out against the unions, their religion, marriage and intimate details of their lifestyle suddenly become "fair game" to journalists who disagree with them. When did that happen?
This is not journalism, it's character assassination.
#7 Posted by JLD, CJR on Mon 31 Jan 2011 at 06:39 PM
What on Earth does the man's religious belief or his marital status have to do with anything?
This is yellow journalism at its worst.
#8 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 31 Jan 2011 at 08:12 PM
Uh, guys? The unions were ones besmirched in this scuffle. The relevance of Theodism is kinda suspect, unless they have some Opus Dei freakiness going on, but the unions are the ones getting bashed based on "Big Government" style reporting of untrustworthy sources.
I still remember the incident during the healthcare debate where libertardian, Kenneth Gladney, started a scuffle with some union guys
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTXBOgPCh9w
and then showed up for tv interviews in a wheelchair. Union Thugs was the mantra then as now, despite the facts.
Let's all remember who the real thugs are.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LZxvYdYOqWQ
And, if you want, we can get into a talk about assassins, character and otherwise, while we're at it.
#9 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 31 Jan 2011 at 08:53 PM
What on Earth does the man's religious belief or his marital status have to do with anything?
This is yellow journalism at its worst.
#10 Posted by padikiller, CJR on Mon 31 Jan 2011 at 09:02 PM
Thimbles, you just insulted Gladney and implied he's lying. Please provide the following personal details:
1. Your religion
2. Your marriage or personal relationship status
3. Your financial position
#11 Posted by JLD, CJR on Mon 31 Jan 2011 at 10:20 PM
My name is Graeme Frost. I used to be an ordinary 12 year old boy when before I spoke out in defense of C.H.I.P.
http://www.nytimes.com/2007/10/12/opinion/12krugman.html
I'm not married and I've been an atheist ever since the conservatives started taking the high ground and God did not smite them. I have granite kitchen tops in my house, but you already knew that.
Thanks for caring.
Graeme*
*not really
#12 Posted by Thimbles, CJR on Mon 31 Jan 2011 at 11:49 PM