The Wall Street Journal launched its New York City section this week amidst a slew of newspaper-war headlines as Rupert Murdoch took aim at the hated New York Times by reconstituting the defunct 13,000 circulation New York Sun.
After seeing the first week of Greater New York, I don’t think The New York Times is shaking in its boots.
Today, the section front is dominated by a story about a donation for fountains at the Met. Really. This is The Wall Street Journal, now.
Even more embarrassing is the story’s fawning treatment of the donation. Here’s the headline:
Met Gets ‘Spectacular’ Facelift
First, the Met hasn’t gotten anything yet. The Journal doesn’t even have the requisite architectural rendering. That would be because the architect hasn’t even been picked yet. Instead the paper has a picture of Lincoln Center’s fountains, which “inspired” right-wing billionaire David H. Koch to give $10 million for the project.
Something tells me the Sun/Journal wouldn’t have done this puff piece if George Soros had given $10 million for a new chandelier at MOMA. And it surely wouldn’t have used the language it does here:
Inspired by Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts, billionaire David H. Koch is planning a “spectacular” remake of the fountains…
Is this The Onion?
Mr. Koch said he was inspired to spearhead the effort to renovate the outdoor space after seeing the new Lincoln Center fountain, which opened in October and features “choreographed” water effects. “They had water shooting 50 feet in the air, flooding the plaza,” he said, recalling that fountain’s unveiling. “I was mesmerized.”
That evening, Mr. Koch cornered Met President Emily Rafferty. “I went right up to her—I was so fired up—and I said, ‘Emily, I want to recreate those fountains!’ “
Man, I can’t wait to see the treatment the Journal gives the ribbon-cutting.
Whatever you think about the Journal’s strategy of spreading into general-interest, and now, local news—and we don’t like it—the bar for stories should be a lot higher than this.
Like, if you get a hot tip on the upcoming PS 205 swap meet, maybe take a pass on that one.
Had to laugh at this one -- I used to edit a small-town weekly newspaper. We once gave front-page, above-the-fold treatment to a new fountain outside town hall that was built as a tribute to a local state senator who had died prematurely of cancer. As the fountain was something short of "spectacular," so was the accompanying photo. True story.
Actually, though, the New Yorker's story on those new fountains at Lincoln Center was pretty interesting:
http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2010/01/11/100111fa_fact_seabrook
In other news... do folks think it's a coincidence that the Times has gone A1 with stories on faked building inspections and a shift in NYC special education policy this week?
#1 Posted by Greg Marx, CJR on Fri 30 Apr 2010 at 02:10 PM
Nice, Greg.
Which makes me wonder: How many journos have written fountain stories in their day? I, too, wrote one--for my college paper. Something on the way in to the football stadium, any changes to which are automatically Big News at the ol' U. of Oklahoma.
And I should say: nothing against small-town weeklies, obviously. The West Seattle Herald is surely the most-anticipated newspaper of the five my household gets. The WSJ is and ought to be a different beast.
#2 Posted by Ryan Chittum, CJR on Fri 30 Apr 2010 at 03:08 PM