At The Daily Beast, Eric Alterman critiques last night’s performance by the White House press corps, giving a thumbs-down to the question asked by Ed Henry of CNN (“Why is it that…Andrew Cuomo seems to be…getting more actual action on [the AIG bonuses front]” and why’d you wait “a few days” before going “public” with your AIG bonus “outrage?”). Writes Alterman:

CNN wants emotions, theatrics, the stamping of feet, mano-a-mano anger, and outrage contests. This is a presidency defined by cable news food-fights and Maureen Dowd-style armchair psychoanalysis…

Now that (the latter sentence, at least) seems a tad cynical, not to mention premature. I might agree if it were something more like: “This is a presidency covered by way of cable news food-fights and Maureen Dowd-style armchair psychoanalysis” or “This is a press corps raised on cable news food-fights and Maureen Dowdian commentary.” But please, let’s not cede to cable news and a New York Times columnist the power to “define” a presidency — let alone 60 days in.

Speaking of over-crediting cable news, in the LA Times James Rainey writes encouragingly of the “good news” coverage popping up in various news outlets, including NBC Nightly News’s “Making A Difference” segment, and of the “misguided conviction among some news people that happy endings and serious journalism don’t mix.” Writes Rainey:

Most networks, cable outlets and big newspapers try to cover the entire spectrum [of news], but their hearts really soar for the weighty, heavy stuff…

“Weighty, heavy stuff” is what makes “hearts” at “cable outlets” “really soar?” Really?

If you'd like to get email from CJR writers and editors, add your email address to our newsletter roll and we'll be in touch.

Liz Cox Barrett is a writer at CJR.