Props to Greg Sargent of Talking Points Memo for digging this up: Maureen Dowd’s New Hampshire morning-after column was probably written in Jerusalem, despite trumpeting the words “DERRY, NH” right up top.
Dowd opens her Wednesday column with Monday morning scenes from her New York Times office, suggesting any Derry-visit took place on Sunday at the latest. That means that the key scenes from New Hampshire—the debate, the misty moment, a Bill Clinton event, and color from the victory party—almost certainly came after her departure to cover the President’s Middle East visit. (And, in any case, none happened in Derry.)
The New York Times has acknowledged that the people-on-the-scene quotes from Clinton’s victory party were collected by an assistant, as is common practice. And they’re defending the bylining as totally kosher, claiming she’d been in Derry, for some time, at some point.
Well, okay. But if the in-house rules allow—indeed, sanction—such easy manipulation, what good could they be? And let’s consider the content of the column; why should I care where Dowd writes about Clinton’s “self-pity” and “need to prove her masculinity,” or how she was “like a heroine in a Lifetime movie”? These are pop-psychology gleanings, not insights from in-person reporting; they don’t require a pilgrimage to Jerusalem—or Derry.


Recent Comments
-
Wertman smith on
David Simon, creator of The Wire and Treme, on the Times-Picayune cuts
(16)
-
fdasfdsa on
Evolved for exhibitionism?
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The private-equity problem with Romney and GS Technologies
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
When a 'birther' story comes knocking
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The Kickstarter Chronicles
(1)
-
Jon Ber on
Murdoch may sell his British papers
(2)
-
Dan A. on
Darts and Laurels
(2)
-
Clayton Burns on
That’s that, part one
(1)
More