For those interested in the Betsy McCaughey saga, Andrew Sullivan has a blog post up today, titled “McCaughey and Me,” that reflects on his role in editing McCaughey’s 1994 attack on the Clinton health care proposal. His conclusion:
But look: it was one piece in a magazine. It’s being treated as if it were a turning point in history. Please. There’s one reason the Clinton healthcare bill failed and it isn’t Betsy McCaughey. It’s Hillary Clinton.
Without embracing Sullivan’s judgment of the former First Lady, this gets at something I should have said more clearly in my piece on McCaughey today: singling her out for abuse risks making her appear more important than she really is—which, in turn, makes other factors appear less important than they really are. That’s a distortion of a far different kind than the type McCaughey peddles, but it’s a distortion nonetheless.



Recent Comments
-
Coatney smith on
Chicago police respect public’s right to record
(1)
-
Wertman smith on
David Simon, creator of The Wire and Treme, on the Times-Picayune cuts
(16)
-
fdasfdsa on
Evolved for exhibitionism?
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The private-equity problem with Romney and GS Technologies
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
When a 'birther' story comes knocking
(1)
-
fdasfdsa on
The Kickstarter Chronicles
(1)
-
Jon Ber on
Murdoch may sell his British papers
(2)
-
Dan A. on
Darts and Laurels
(2)
More