Sigh. We’ve reached the part of the campaign season (if we hadn’t already, I’ve lost track) where the RNC issuing a press release — or, the “RNC sends out an email attacking Obama,” as was reported on MSNBC just now — is newsworthy (or at least, cable news-worthy.)
And then, you know, MSNBC does the equivalent of forwarding that RNC email to its hundreds of thousands of viewers (“The Republican National Committee is trying to attack Barack Obama today by using foreign dictators including North Korea’s Kim Jong-il. The RNC noted a newspaper in Japan sympathetic to North Korea’s government has now praised Obama’s pledge to meet with Kim…”) And not without first attaching its own unenlightening two cents to the original email — that is, hosting a segment with one “Democratic strategist” and one “Republican strategist” pondering “Will Attacks Work?” in which “Republican strategist” calls the RNC “wise to make reporters aware of what’s being said by people around the world.”
Wise, indeed.
There are going to be so many of these emails going forward from the RNC, the DNC, and I shudder to think who else. A request for the press: If you’re going to talk about them, could you do more than talk about their existence, their value as an attack angle, their likely political impact? Could you also consider (preferably first and off-air) how your talking about their existence impacts that impact (and also the impact your decision to cover or not might have on other stories of the day: ask yourselves, as an example from today’s MSNBC coverage, can viewers afford the resulting pregnant pause in our otherwise relentless coverage of the Gloucester “Pregnancy Pact”)? And, would it be too much to ask you to touch on any distortions or exaggerations or missing details they may contain?
(Related nit-pick: As my colleague observed, MSNBC’s David Shuster described Daniel Ortega, another of the “bad guys” the RNC is “tying to” Obama, as “Nicaragua’s Sandinista rebel leader.” He’s also the president. But maybe that bit didn’t make it into the RNC email.)

Please tell this gentleman that if the inscription 'In GOD we Trust" does not please him- that he can send me any and all of the 'bad' pieces of money that does have this on it.
I am not only PROUD of this inscription but wish that those who are not can find a place (any other country) that does not believe in GOD.
IF he cannot find one I will be glad to tell him where to go. OES
Atheist challenges 'In God We Trust'
An atheist who has spent four years trying to ban the Pledge of Allegiance from being recited in public schools is now challenging the motto printed on U.S. currency because it refers to God.
Posted by Orvil Shaffer on Thu 21 Aug 2008 at 10:43 AM
Related nit-pick: As my colleague observed, MSNBC’s David Shuster described Daniel Ortega, another of the “bad guys” the RNC is “tying to” Obama, as “Nicaragua’s Sandinista rebel leader.” He’s also the president. But maybe that bit didn’t make it into the RNC email
Another related nit-pick, next time you decide its time to stick up for Daniel Ortega, you might want to mention that he molested his daughter for almost a decade.
Posted by TDC on Thu 21 Aug 2008 at 12:51 PM
Who's running the network, the anchors? All of your network people are so "in the tank" for Obama it is apparent when they "talk over" anyone with a Republican point of view. Maybe us viewers should contact the people who are advertising on your MSNBC to show our displeasure. Who is the boss up there? They have lost control of the talking heads completely.
Posted by sybila on Sun 7 Sep 2008 at 05:19 PM