D.C.-based journo Julian Sanchez has articulated what many of us have been thinking for the last few years: that there is a new news cycle at play. He calls it, appropriately, the “new news cycle” and invokes, without actual mention, a few hot-button news ghosts of the past (birthers, deathers, Panthers) and present (mosque/community center/jihadist headquarters).

From his blog post yesterday:

The steps are:

1. Faux Story

2. Why is the Em-Ess-Em ignoring this huge Faux Story?

3. After days or weeks of flood-the-zone coverage across multiple conservative media outlets, some significant portion of the base is convinced that the faux story is true and/or significant.

4. Mainstream press takes note of (3) and speculates about the political and electoral consequences

5. Panicked Democrats react as though the faux story is true and/or significant

6. See, we told you it was a huge story!

Lather, rinse, repeat.

Of course, this does not represent all new “news” stories. There are, occasionally, still news pegs and happenings that drive the cycle. But it’s a nice take on those stories churned out of the FNC mill.

We might add a point 4.1: newspaper ombudsmen apologize for not covering the story after their desk is deluged with handwritten and chopped-up-magazine-pasted notes.

And a 4.2: the CJR team sits in the Executive Editor’s office and wrings their hands about what angle to take on the story that shouldn’t have been.

And a 5.1: the “Em-Ess-Em” (ugh, them again) reacts to the Democrat reactions.

And a 5.2: Halperin, Allen et al take to the airwaves. Whoopi and the gals weigh in.

Oh and heck, a 5.3 also: someone unexpected, usually a Republican, veers off message and acknowledges the whole thing for what it is, “small potatoes.”

Anything you’d like to add?

If you'd like to get email from CJR writers and editors, add your email address to our newsletter roll and we'll be in touch.

Joel Meares is a former CJR assistant editor.