When New York Times Magazine editor Gerald Marzorati, in the course of pondering the future of long-form journalism in a Q&A with readers, mentioned this week that the magazine was about to publish a 13,000-word story that cost an estimated $400,000 to produce, it was impossible not to wonder what the article would be about.
Readers more attuned to the calendar probably could have guessed: on the fourth anniversary of Hurricane Katrina, the piece, written by Sheri Fink and co-published by ProPublica, explores the “deadly choices” made in the storm’s wake at New Orleans’s Memorial Medical Center. The story is now up here and here. In a related editor’s note, Marzorati notes that some of the funds that helped pay for the piece came from the Kaiser Family Foundation, which has come to play a significant role when it comes to underwriting science and medical reporting.
So, in a media world in which time and money are ever more precious, does Fink’s article deliver on the resources invested in it? I’ll be on a plane Saturday morning, and I intend to find out then. Regardless, it’s encouraging that there are still a few places where stories of such grand ambition can be realized.





Recent Comments
-
isaac on
Well, It May Deserve an Award in Something
(10)
-
JLD on
Not For All the News in China, Part I
(2)
-
JLD on
Popular Diplomacy
(11)
-
Donald Isenman on
Everybody's On Edge
(1)
-
Shawn on
Strike a Pose—Rogue (Rogue, Rogue…)
(76)
-
JSF on
Greg Craig and Transparency
(1)
-
JSF on
Let's Get this Party Organized
(2)
-
B. S. Davis on
Straying from the Facts
(48)
More