Anyone remember the “Kerry’s Choice” headline splashed on the front page of the New York Post back in July, 2004? At the time, The Post ran with the scoop that John Kerry, who was about to announce his choice for vice presidential running mate, had given the nod to congressman Richard Gephardt. They were first on the story—only problem was, it wasn’t true.
Not only was it not true, (for those who can’t remember back that far, John Edwards pulled the short straw for the Dems), but the story generated some controversy, since it didn’t include either a byline or a source for attribution, and rumors swirled that the paper’s owner, Rupert Murdoch, forced the story down his editor’s throats.
That’s where we stood until today, when Michael Cooper reported on the New York Times’ “The Caucus” blog that Ian Spiegelman, a former gossip reporter at the Post, is claiming that “the paper was duped by Democrats,” and that the tip was actually given to Rupert’s son, Lachlan Murdoch, who was at the time the publisher of the paper. “Everyone at The Post,” Spiegelman said, “including Col Allan and his top deputies, knew the story had been planted with Lachlan by the Democratic National Committee to make him, and The Post, appear foolish on a national level.”
Mission accomplished!





LOL...
If the GOP had been stupid enough to deliberately mislead one of the liberal mouthpieces like the NYT three years ago..
I'm SURE that Paul McLeary would be right there downplaying the "ancient history", and poking fun at the NYT for falling victim to such fair-play, political shenanigans...
SURE he would...
Posted by padikiller
on Tue 29 May 2007 at 07:01 PM
At this point I can only assume that Paul McLeary slept with padikiller's prom date or beat him out for student council president.
Just another online coward hiding behind a cryptic pseudonym.
Posted by R.Severn
on Wed 30 May 2007 at 12:07 PM
Another ad hominem attack!
C'est la guerre....
However, there is more than a modicum of irony in being labeled a pseudonymous "coward" by a pseudonymous critic...
Let's linger a while and see if anyone can offer any substantial criticism of my take on Paul McLEary's selective tolerance for political subterfuge and manipulation of the news....
Posted by padikiller
on Wed 30 May 2007 at 12:24 PM
padikiller says:
"If the GOP had been stupid enough to deliberately mislead one of the liberal mouthpieces like the NYT three years ago.."
then later clarifies it as:
"...my take on Paul McLEary's selective tolerance..."
Ryan Severn (actual name) responds:
It seems padikiller's "take" on his perceived motivation for McLeary's piece is based on a hypothetical fiction world where he can predict the outcome of events. Nice work if you can get it.
I'm SURE padikiller would be singing the same tune if sentient albino kangaroos kidnapped him and forced him to play dodgeball while wearing corned beef knickers.
SURE he would...
Posted by R.Severn
on Wed 30 May 2007 at 01:26 PM
Mr. Severn Wrote
I'm SURE padikiller would be singing the same tune if sentient albino kangaroos kidnapped him and forced him to play dodgeball while wearing corned beef knickers.
padikiller responds
And once again, we've veered of the Realityville Expressway, and found ourselves stuck in traffic on the McLearyland Turnpike...
The only way to forge an argument in McLearyland is forego reality...
Making an observation (through a rhetorical hypothetical question) about Paul McLeary's selective tolerance for political hijoinks does not require or suffere a comparison to a mythological abduction by mindful marsupials...
Such fallacious reasoning, while amusing, is not useful in debate..
Posted by padikiller
on Wed 30 May 2007 at 03:49 PM