PH: Yes. Constantly. I have to read more. I had areas of my own carved out that I cared about and worked on—global health, you know, and I can offer some of that to the fellows. But I’m definitely starting to read more and more and more. You have to be soaking it up, you have to start listening, you have to wander around campus and talk to people. It’s an education for me, or reeducation—there’s just a massive amount of stuff out there. And my job is really reporting, except that what I’m doing is finding the topics and finding the speakers, but not actually writing about them. It’s a big challenge, but I must say, I really like doing this.
The Observatory — August 18, 2008 10:29 AM
The Future of Science Journalism Fellowships
CJR chats with new Knight, MIT director Phil Hilts
Subscribe to the Columbia Journalism Review at our special Web rates.
—advertisement—
Blog
The Kicker last updated: Fri 4:43 PM
- Greg Craig and Transparency
- Well, It May Deserve an Award in Something
- Now a Little Bit Less Excluded
- Thoughts on the Gelman/Silver Op-Ed
- The Luxury Store Has No Clothes
Desks
The Audit Business
The Observatory Science
- Saving Corwin’s Creatures MSNBC wades into new territory with environmental documentary 100 Heartbeats
- Trains, Planes, and Carbon Offsets Times keeps a needed eye on green premiums
Campaign Desk Politics & Policy
- Greg Craig and Transparency
- Not For All the News in China, Part I Former NYT Shanghai bureau chief Howard French on the coverage of Obama’s trip to Asia
Behind the News The Media
I'm heartened to learn about the robustness of the program and the breadth and depth of quality in the talent pool.
However, I nosed around the website and did my usual searching for reportage which includes professional nursing and nurses and came up with zero.
Neither MIT nor Harvard field nursing programs, and unless reporters are actively seeking out expert nurses, they aren't overly likely to bump into them on those campuses. They would be able to find them at Boston College, Univ. of Massachusetts at Boston and Amherst, and farther afield, at the Univ. of Connecticut, Yale, Columbia and NYU.
However, it is critical that health and science reporters learn about the profession of nursing, its fundamental practice precepts, and its ethics and extant issues.
As a case in point, no reporter has yet to investigate the use of nurses as agents of abuse and torture on immigrant detainees and prisoners. However, nurses practice primarily as employees and obedience to employer directives and the mandate to be "good nurses" causes many nurses to act against the interests of patients when their means of livelihood is threatened.
Moreover, it's nursing care which directly affects patients' morbidity, mortality and degree of suffering in the most immediate sense.
Reporters are allowing nurses to fly under the radar in investigating abuse and torture, and everyone loses.
But so far, it doesn't appear that including nursing in health reportage is even on the curriculum for journalists. I hope that changes.
Home of the Brave is where I have more to say.
Posted by Annie on Mon 18 Aug 2008 at 12:17 PM
Annie, Thanks for the comment. We're not limited to MIT and Harvard for our speakers. We get them from all over the country, and we are planning one on nursing. I think you're right, and would love to hear more from you about who's the best to talk on these issues.
Posted by Phil Hilts on Mon 18 Aug 2008 at 01:48 PM
Thanks, Phil, for your interest. Email me at aek2013 at columbia dot edu at your convenience to explore further.
A good source primer for nursing demographics and position papers/policy statements is the American Association of Colleges of Nursing website.
The other essential reference is the website of the National Institute of Nursing Research (one of the NIH institutes).
The Code of Ethics for Nurses with Interpretive Statements may be found on the American Nurses Association website, but it's buried and still proprietary - a problem itself, in my view.
Posted by Annie on Mon 18 Aug 2008 at 04:40 PM
View from the sticks:
MIT's Open Courseware course list has only 1 hit for the word "journalism" - " Documentary Photography and Photo Journalism".
Plenty of courses on writing, but the focus seems to be technical writing, not journalism.
Also - a writing class is suboptimal if there's nobody to give feedback on the assignments a far-flung visitor might otherwise be tempted to complete.
So, for Open Courseware, would it perhaps make sense to have "Mechanical Turk" type teaching fellows for each course? We could remunerate them with beads and trinkets from our native lands, also perhaps with grants from Craig Newmark.
(yes, i realize the Fellowships are about science for journalists and not journalism for scientists, so as a critique this is rather off base. But it is mostly sincere nonetheless.)
Posted by Anna on Wed 20 Aug 2008 at 01:03 AM
I don't think that journalism for scientists is off base; one increasingly finds scientists as the authors of op-eds in areas of expertise. This cross-fertilization has the potential to improve the situation in which journalists are reluctant to 'shout out' the actual state of climate change understanding, and instead revert to dueling quotes. Not sufficient to supply essential context.
Posted by Stan Wiggins on Thu 28 Aug 2008 at 03:29 PM