William Hardy Gest co-reported and co-wrote this piece. Holly Regan contributed research.
AUSTIN, Texas — As the country debates gun control laws in the wake of the Newtown massacre, politicians in Texas have a distinct response: Guns, guns, and more guns.
Gov. Rick Perry has advocated that school administrators and teachers be allowed to carry licensed, concealed weapons. Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst wants special, state-paid weapons and tactics training for selected school employees. State Rep. Jason Villalba, R-Dallas, recently proposed legislation that would allow schools to appoint employees as armed “marshals.” Rep. Debbie Riddle, R-Tomball, has a plan like Dewhurst’s. Bills have been introduced in the House and Senate here to allow college students to carry concealed weapons on campus.
By way of background: Texas state law prohibits guns in schools but individual school boards can opt to allow employees with concealed carry permits to bring their firearms to school. Currently, just three small, rural school districts—out of more than 1,200 districts and charter schools—are known to allow employees to carry guns on campus, and none of the three have their own campus cops, as bigger districts do. The state teachers’ association opposes arming its members. Fifty-six percent of Texans oppose arming teachers, according to a recent poll by national Democratic firm Public Policy Polling, and only 31 percent support the idea. And yet, the line of politicians in Austin proposing more guns in schools is long and distinguished.
And the press coverage of these proposals? Well, a lot of it has failed to consider common sense questions, or provide context, analysis, or just plain reporting beyond what politicians and interest groups say. The press in the nation’s second-largest state hasn’t mentioned published data on the gun violence rate here or questioned the political motives of ambitious politicians. But worst of all, in reporting on proposals to arm teachers, the coverage has missed that more than 1,000 educators have been reprimanded or worse, lost or surrendered their teaching license in the last five years, for everything from complaints filed by students to criminal charges by police—including some serious felonies. Nearly 200 school districts are out of compliance with the state law requiring background checks and fingerprints.
Yes, the Texas press has asked experts and police their opinions of the various guns-in-schools proposals. The San Antonio Express-News in January pointed out that any district arming its teachers could face legal liabilities. The Fort Worth Star-Telegram, in a late December piece, took comment from the National Rifle Association and the Brady Campaign. Austin’s KVUE and the Texas Tribune recently quoted a police chief pointing out that even highly-trained officers can make mistakes when using deadly force.
But while news coverage has hardly championed the anti-gun control agenda, the reporting, like the political debate, has overlooked some important elements of the discussion—among them, one pretty fundamental reason why schools may not be the best place to put weapons. According to data compiled by the Texas Education Agency, over the last five years more than 1,300 teachers (out of the 324,213 in Texas) have lost or surrendered their teaching licenses, or been suspended or reprimanded, for a range of non-criminal complaints and criminal charges—up to and including violent felonies. A more detailed breakdown according to categories of offense was unavailable, but terminable offenses include homicide, assault, and sexual assault. “If a license is revoked or surrendered,” said TEA spokeswoman DeEtta Culbertson, “then they’ve committed a pretty senior offense.”

"Or how about this one: Teachers with guns. Really?"
Actually the simpler response to this whole discussion about needing more guns to stop gun violence is "Are you insane?"
I wonder what Wyatt Earp would say - as I recall, he didn't deal with the problem of gun violence in Tombstone AZ by pushing for more guns. But then, old Wyatt kind of knew his way around guns, and wasn't blindly stupid.
#1 Posted by JohnR, CJR on Mon 18 Feb 2013 at 12:32 PM
So, is this part of Biden's push for the "legitimate news media" to parrot the administrations line on gun control?
#2 Posted by Mike H, CJR on Mon 18 Feb 2013 at 03:40 PM
So what? Why do you care what we do in our state? Maybe you should look at Chicago gun violence and their gun laws instead of using the old let's look at the wild west bullshit again. Get real.
#3 Posted by Bill, CJR on Tue 19 Feb 2013 at 12:21 PM
Let's see what your objections are about ... you don't like any factual reporting without the liberal biased "analysis?" Your entire article was an extremely biased liberal piece of garbage.
Felons cannot own a weapon, much less have a concealed permit. Look at ANY large business and you will find people with criminal records. Those criminal records will keep most of them from ever getting a CHL.
Go back to your liberal northeast.
#4 Posted by Robert R, CJR on Tue 19 Feb 2013 at 01:24 PM
So out of 324,213 teachers, some 1,300 teachers have lost or surrendered their teaching licenses, or been suspended or reprimanded. That's .4%. Clearly, those people would probably not even qualify for a concealed handgun license. And let's just be clear that NO ONE is advocating that every teacher be armed, and certainly no that .4%.
Let's talk about that January "poll" of Texas residents favoring a ban on something referred to as "assault weapons." I looked at the opinion survey; the term "assault weapon" is not even defined. Know why? Because it's not a technical term from the firearms lexicon. Rather, it's a bogus made-up propaganda term (like "gateway drugs") that has absolutely no fixed meaning. Someone should conduct a survey of Texas public opinion regarding the question: "Should law-abiding American adult citizens have the right to keep and bear homeland defense rifles?" Yeah, I know, the term "homeland defense rifle" is just as much a propaganda term as "assault weapon," and that's precisely my point.
In a sane world, one would expect reporters to use objective, neutral language in their straight news reporting.
#5 Posted by BillMiller, CJR on Tue 19 Feb 2013 at 01:57 PM
More guns mean more deaths. Deny that if you will, but it's a fact.
If Texans want more of both, I say have at it. I'll just include it in third world places to be avoided when I plan future vacations and business trips.
#6 Posted by D Paul, CJR on Wed 20 Feb 2013 at 11:00 AM